Bin Laden surrending Bagdad....

[PSR40004]

The news is reporting the latest Binladen tapes are stating his followers should pull out of bagdad and attack Americans in other places. Sounds like he's retreating from that area and has decided to go back to attacking civilians. This should be a good thing for Iraqi's as it should help stablize the area and help them in sorting things out.

Of course something that helps Iraq out probably hurts most Democrat canidates if Iraq gets on track by summer. Not to mention attacks on civilians will help bushlite as people will see him as more justified in his actions (my Opinion).

[whatelseisnew]

1. "the news"? link?

[rooboy]

2. Yeah...

George Bush really has Al Qaeda on the run, doesn't he? Instead of bin Laden being surrounded, HE gets to decide when he'll pull out and what he'll do next. Your president is a loser.

Hurts Democratic candidates??? Not likely!!!

[RC]

5. Hmmmmm. If bin Laden pulls out of Baghdad and

that helps stabilize the area.... And a more stable Baghdad helps bush during this election year....

Hmmmm, bin Laden sure has done a lot to help bu$h with his agenda, starting with the new Pearl Harbor - 9/11.

[La_Serpiente]

3. do you have a link?

and what you said is a good thing (for Baghdad at least). There is no reason to politcize it.

[Media_Lies_Daily]

4. Do you have a source for your news?

[Enraged_Ape]

6. Uh...yeah, right.

I would ask you for a link to this "news" story, but I can tell from your grammar, spelling, and punctuation that I would be wasting my time.

[SoFlaJets]

23. Enraged Ape

I love your avatar-Snake Pliskin....I thought he was dead?........

[Bob3]

7. Grains of salt all around please

This assumes that Mr. Ladden is directing the attacks on US troops - which is a bit of a stretch no? Most reports say the resistance comes from several diverse groups (for one I can not imagine Baath party diehards taking orders from Bin Ladden) and there is no central control (yet).

[are_we_united_yet]

26. I almost thought you said

Grain of salt Alert!!

[Bridget Burke]

8. Bin Laden "surrounding" Bagdad (?)

Perhaps you ought to check your spelling.

Or, just give us a LINK!

[blondeatlast]

9. What news? Link?

C'mon, ya gotta do better than that . . .

Edit: even if you are a . . . :evilgrin:

[DoYouEverWonder]

10. Looks like another hit and run

BTW: What is the definition of surrending? I don't think I've ever heard that word.

[Stephanie]

11. Surrending is Freepish for "I'm making this stuff up"

Usage:

Surrending his case for the invasion of Iraq, Bush cited Weapons of Mass Destruction Program-Related Activities, or WMDPRAs.

Cheney surrended that mobile bio-weapons labs had been discovered in Iraq.

[DoYouEverWonder]

17. I'll have to add that to my New American Freeper Dictionary

Does it come before or after moran?

[0rganism]

32. It's a "mixed verb", in this case "surrender" and "surround"

It's a peculiar tactic, also variously known as "encircle and yield," and "overwhelm with white flag superiority." Lately, while it has fallen out of favor with the conventional military strategists, "surrending" has been used to dramatic effect in the NBA by the Portland Trailblazers, who confuse their opponents by blowing large leads in the 4th quarter, perhaps in the hope of securing a stunning overtime upset victory.

[JanMichael]

12. Do you have a link? Or are *you* the "news"?

Either way it doesn't make a goddamned difference since the people killing American Occupiers aren't ALL al Qaida! Matter of fact I would guess that very few are actually following bin Laden's orders.

I call BULLSHIT on this thread.

[radwriter0555]

13. er, bin laden has been dead since December 2001. He's not telling anyone

much of anything unless he's pulling one of those miracle revisiting things...

[Name removed]

14. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Name removed]

15. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Skidmore]

18. How do you

do the alert thing?

[blondeatlast]

22. Look to the left (grin)

Little box on the lower left. Just click it and tell them why you did.

[Skidmore]

24. Thanks...

I'm still having trouble with looking straight ahead...s'pose I'll get used to these trifocals someday.

:)

[blondeatlast]

16. Wait! Let's see if he comes back to the thread, though

I sincerely doubt it.

[DoYouEverWonder]

19. Sometimes

I like to play with them for a little first, but that's just a personal preference.

[blondeatlast]

21. Me too--like a cat before the kill.

[htuttle]

20. BWahahahahahahah!!!!!! LOL!!

You must be just continually fucking disappointed lately if you believe crap like this, eh?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

[blondeatlast]

25. Appears to be a classic drive-by posting. Pity,

it didn't even stir us up!

Facts (and the requirement of them) are the surest thread-killers out there.

[Name removed]

27. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Fescue4u]

28. When did Osama have Bagdad to surrendar it?

More Muslim nuttyness IMO.

[Robin Hood]

29. Judging by the Iowa Caucuses people don't give a rats ass about Iraq.

What they do care about is the economy, social issues, the direction of the country and so on. All of those things bush can't and hasn't done anything about. What's interesting is that Bush's SOTU speech is that he came off even more out of touch than his father did in the early 90's.

It's sad but proves the old saying to be true that Fruit don't fall far from the tree. Like father, like son, one term and his done.

[Aidoneus]

30. our friend seems to be a reader of WorldNetDaily or the NYPost

:shrug:

Ridiculous thread starter, either way.

[Serenity-NOW]

31. Not clear how that hurts Dems since

It means Dumbya fucked up once again. Take the party to the terra ists and they move the party elsewhere where there aren't a buncha troops. I'd say that hurts the repukes in a serious way since the DUMBASS just told us we're 'winning' the war on terror and we've nailed 2/3s of 'known' Al Queda leaders. Never mind the ones we don't know about who just don't care to play by Dumbyas rules. Troops get pulled out to fight another front and Iraq is still a shambles.

[leftofthedial]

33. except that bin Laden is not in Baghdad

and neither are his followers.

where is this "news"?

[Doctor_J]

34. I remember you

A few weeks ago you stoppped by to predict that the December job reports would show enormous growth, and that Smirk's 3M lost jobs would all be recovered by November. You're even dumber than Duh-bya.

[Heyo]

35. FYI...

I have been looking eveywhere for the link but can't find it now.. the story is a few days old but was on the major news websites breifly (ABC, CNN, Fox etc)

The story was just that on a website there was a call supposedly from Osama calling for the jihadis to stay out of Iraq and attack alsewhere.

Take it for what it's worth.. dont have a link, but the story was there. I didn't pay it much attention because I didn't see it as a big deal really...

Heyo

[Kathy in Cambridge]

36. Another Post-N-Run

Where's your link, Einstein?

[Gato Moteado]

37. "Democrat canidates"?

interesting choice of words. shouldn't that be "Democratic candidates"?

also, you seem to be implying that bin laden followers attacking americans in other places is a good thing. that doesn't seem to be a typical DU attitude. here at DU we don't want our civilians or our military attacked by anyone anywhere.