Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hans Blix on Frontline last night....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 06:33 PM
Original message
Hans Blix on Frontline last night....
Frontline: Now the whole question of the so-called centrifuge tubes, the aluminium tubes-- Nothing much has come of that, has it? And yet much was made of it.

Hans Blix: Oh, much was made of it. … We have learnt since then that the Department of Energy, which are the ones who do enrichment in the U.S., that they had also expressed doubts about it. I see that on the U.S. side of intelligence, they are still saying, "Well, there was one batch that was a little less precise, and there was another batch where the specifications were more demanding," etcetera. But to me, this looks more like a rear-guard action. They would rather end the whole thing by controversy than by an admission that it was wrong.


Frontline: So no one can say, "Well, there definitely weren't weapons."

Hans Blix: I think so. Controversy will be preferable to a judgment.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/wmd/interviews/blix.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Controversy is preferable to a judgment"
I'm not absolutely sure, but I believe this particular "truth management" (read, propaganda) technique more or less originates with the big tobacco companies. You can't PROVE the link between cigarettes and cancer, therefore it's "controversial." Works for the oil companies on global warming. Works for Creationists on evolution, too--or at least, they think it does, which practically amounts to the same thing.

But I don't think any administration in history has made such good use of this Corporate-PR strategy. "If you're caught red-handed and you're guilty as sin, muddy the waters."

I don't think any administration has taken it so far as these guys and their apologists, for whom simply outright lying is considered one of the valid water-muddying techniques. I cite a statistic that doesn't exist, I flatly deny what I flatly asserted yesterday, and by the time you can come back at me with a fact check the discussion has moved on to whatever my latest fabrication is.

Truly astonishing. Nixon was an absolute piker by comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 20th 2025, 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC