|
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 02:49 PM by Cleita
Back in 2000, that was pretty much what you heard coming from both candidates, number one, the patient's bill of rights and number two, prescription drug benefits for seniors and number three the lock box for Social Security.
Since Bush, with the help of Satan, started the right wing's determination to end Medicare with the passage of his prescription drug benefit for the pharmaceutical industry, one hears nothing about the patient's bill of rights anymore.
I was never for it until now. Being firmly of the belief that a single payer universal health care system would bring us into the twenty-first century alongside the rest of the industrialized nations of the world, I never gave it much thought. But slowly, I am coming to the realization that pigs will fly before that happens and the patients bill of rights is looking more attractive to me. Why?
First, I think the private health care industry needs to keep it's administrative costs to within 2% and 4% of revenue. The balance has to be used for health care, not the 23% administrative costs they use now (a conservative figure, incidentally).
Second, no one can be refused coverage. No more cherry picking the young and healthy for coverage.
Third, no one can be charged extra for pre-existing or chronic condition or age but must be charged the same as everyone else.
Fourth, health plans must negotiate with pharmaceutical companies for the best price. No more gouging the American people for profits.
I guess you can see where I am going here. The only way we are ever going to get national health care here is to drive the insurance and HMO's out of the business. The only way to do this is to make sure there is no profit in it anymore. Then and only then will you see an end to the lobbying and propagandizing from these entities.
|