|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Killarney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 08:01 PM Original message |
Kay calls for Probe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
J B (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. Much stronger wording than before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zeke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yeah, But... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snappy (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 08:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mourningdove92 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. Trying to wash away Smirks sins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewagner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. Kay was a "True Believer" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrior1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 08:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. He WAS selected based on his 'true believer status'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unknown Known (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
7. Love that Hans Blix! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jokerman93 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
8. I thought Kay was in sympathy with the administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. He is. They are trying to blame the CIA. Fortunately, the CIA quite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
10. that is fucking BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. If anyone thinks the CIA is going to take the fall for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ivote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:45 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Maybe they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I'm betting a leak a week from now through the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unknown Known (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Yes, the Plame story is integral to this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
14. Oh my, the CIA is going to get really mad now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
16. Maybe he's having a David Brock or Arianna Huffington epiphany? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
17. Oh. Thought "probe" of BFEE. Nevermind. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
18. yikes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-04 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
20. O'Neill: Bush Planned to Invade Iraq From Day One |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 20th 2025, 06:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC