... the (Canadian) Constitution IS considered to be "a living, breathing thing", and in fact it has been a tenet of constitutional interpretation for several decades that it is just that: "The Constitution is a living tree" is one of the most well-known pronouncements of the constitutional courts.
Oh look, the Supreme Court of Canada couldn't have said it better itself:
This Court has consistently endorsed the living tree principle as a fundamental tenet of constitutional interpretation.
Seriously, if anyone here were to quote one of the Fathers of Confederation in a discussion of, say, same-sex marriage or firearms control or religious discrimination, people would point and laugh. The tree has grown a lot of new branches since their day, and the people who live under it feel quite competent and entitled to use it for the purposes that best suit us, not whatever might have suited a bunch of old dead rich white guys who were often wont to drink too much.
USAmericans do indeed tend to take a different view of their constitution, one that we up here might call the "petrified tree" approach. ;)
I'm quite sure that this is what the GOP website is referring to: the US Constitution is not "a living, breathing thing", it is a thing etched on parchment that must be applied exactly as its authors intended, even if what it's being applied to are things they could never have imagined in their wildest dreams.
Nonetheless, it doesn't exactly sound like a compliment to say that something is not a living, breathing thing. Might be worth taking a second look at that notion, when they put it that way!
.