|
Edited on Sat Jan-31-04 06:47 PM by priller
First of all, about them suddenly discovering it's going to cost more. This quote just set me off:
White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the disparate numbers do not mean the president misled Congress. He said the administration's actuaries in the budget office began work on the numbers only after the bill became law.
:wow: Huh?
So where did the initial $400 billion estimate come from? If they didn't start working on the numbers until after the bill (which I don't believe, btw) then how did they get that estimate? Did Cheney just grab it out of his ass?
Secondly, I highly recommend Louis Lapham's article "Bad Medicine" in the Feb Harper's. He points out some of the more egregious provisions of the bill, plus dishes out lots of dirt on Bill Frist's family HCA hospital firm. I though this paragraph was especially prescient:
Even the dimmest Republican congressman knows the government doesn't have the $400 billion the drug prescription benefit presumably will cost over the next ten years--doesn't have the cash on hand or anywhere in anybody's budget projection. The money must be borrowed, at rates of interest yet to be determined. In the meantime, while waiting upon possibly unhappy financial events (wars, revenue shortfalls, stock market downturns, sustained recession, etc) the government retains no control of the fees charged by the health plans or the prices that the pharmaceutical companies demand for drugs. Let Mother Nature take her course, and the expenditure estimated at $400 billion could easily become an invoice presented for $1 trillion.
Hey, we're already on our way there.
|