Today’s CNN poll about WMD..Vote at
myomy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 12:28 PM
Original message |
Today’s CNN poll about WMD..Vote at |
tigereye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. there you go, 93% yes, 7 % no. |
Bozita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Should there be an independent commission...? |
Loonman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Heh...Wolfie will pretend this poll didn't exist |
|
While he bows to his GOP paymasters.
|
stumblnrose
(405 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
4. It all depends on the meaning of "independent" |
|
Looks like David Kay is a great candidate for heading the Bush-controlled "independent" investigation. Remember Lord Hutton's balanced inquiry!
|
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Independent, right, "Mission Accomplished, Whats the difference? |
|
The only thing that would make that an independent committee is if they choose Ima Independent, an often cited but seldom seen retired Magistrate from Podunkville Redstate to head the commission.
|
lovedems
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message |
6. The 7% must be the WH staffers frantically trying to cover their bosses |
|
ass.
Or, the delightfully uninformed.
|
tigereye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
"delightfully uninformed" Great. I will have to steal that.
|
trof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
"Should there be an independent commission? Sure. Should Bush* choose the members? Wouldn't that be like Clinton choosing the House members to oversee his impeachment proceedings? Seems so to me."
|
Mandate My Ass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
An astute DUer pointed out on another thread that the Chimp is appointing an "independent" commission who is to report their results in 2005, presumably after his reselection. The very fact that they're appointed by him means they're not independent. This is already being framed as an intelligence failure and that is what will be dutifully reported and Bush will come out of this pile of shit vindicated and smelling like a rose.
"Should there be an independent commission to find the facts on Iraq's WMD?
The wording is skewed to convey the idea there are WMDs in Iraq even though we all know by now none ever existed. Why not ask why Bush hasn't yet been impeached or tried for treason for leading the country to war on a lie?
|
devinsgram
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Still 93%. Way to go everyone. |
OffWithTheirHeads
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
11. You can be pretty sure it will be stacked |
|
when Commander Codpiece appoints Kissinger to head it up.
|
yellowcanine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 02:12 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Need to also ask, if Bush appoints it, can it be "independent?" |
|
My answer would be no. No one in the administration should have a role in appointing this commission.
|
yellowcanine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Also should be a 6 month timetable. |
|
Commission should have complete authority to subpeona anything from anybody and stonewalling by any admin official be immediate grounds for dismissal and prosecution.
|
camero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
14. How many times do they have to do the same frikkin poll? |
Greyskye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Until they get the answers they want. |
camero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. and the numbers they don't want |
|
keep gettting bigger each time. They should give up.
|
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
sybylla
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
18. WMD question gone - now Janet Jackson and CBS |
|
Supposedly with over 100,000 votes already. What's up. Did I miss something?
|
ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
21. is janet jackson's boob a weapon of mass distraction from No WMD's Found? |
|
Should the FCC investigate Janet Jackson's Super Bowl breast-baring? Yes 51% 58075 votes No 49% 56595 votes Total: 114670 votes
|
geniph
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 04:24 PM
Response to Original message |
19. AAAAH! All is Boobgate! |
|
Boobgate has even taken this over! Good gawd. Can we please talk about something more substantive than nipples?!
|
tom_paine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. WE might be able to, but collectively, the Imperial Subjects of Amerika |
|
cannot, apparently.
Or perhaps Imperial Pravda is just shoveling trivialities down our throats.
I can't tell anymore.
|
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-02-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message |
22. LOL!! I can't let CNN know I came to vote for just this - |
|
Edited on Mon Feb-02-04 04:35 PM by 0007
Now I gotta take a shower.
This was the tit vote, and I did go back and vote NO -
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.