Gang,
Interesting threads here on the possibility of electronic voting fraud in the New Hampshire Primary:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1083554and:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=215244Some folks put forth the argument, "Wouldn't Bush rather run against Dean anyway," therefore, "Why rig the machines to favor Kerry?"
You're still making the assumption of "fair" elections and that we have a "choice."
Hell, just look at what the media did to Howard Dean. Iowa and New Hampshire were pitched to us as "The Rise of John Kerry." I didn't see that at all. I saw "The Media's Complete and Very Public 24/7 Trashing of Howard Dean." What did Kerry actually DO that was so great to suddenly make him leap forward 20-30 points almost overnight to the head of the pack?
What am I to believe, the US Media, or MY LYING EYES?
Last October, remember it was "Howard Dean is THE ONE!" "Howard Dean is the likely nominee!" And "Kerry is OVER." "Kerry has no message." Kerry fired his campaign manager. Well, right smack in the middle of this YES DEAN, NO KERRY orgy, Mike Ruppert of From The Wilderness PREDICTED KERRY WILL BE "THE ANNOINTED ONE; HOWARD DEAN WILL FADE."
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/102003_beyond_bush_2.htmlHow did Ruppert or anyone else "know?"
Kerry is Skull & Bones, Council on Foreign Relations, TriLateral Commission, Bilderberg. That's why.
Don't you get it? The "Masters Of The Universe" and the military-industrial-petroleum complex will thusly have "their man" in BOTH Republican and Democratic candidates.
IT'S DONE. Either way, they WIN. Now it's just a matter of who wants it "badder," Kerry or Bush? The REAL rulers of this country, the "Shadow Government" has accomplished it's goal already; now they'll just let the children fight it out until November.
Don't you get it? The 2004 Election has ALREADY been STOLEN!
Captain Mike