Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

60 Minutes II didn't call Powell a liar just now.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:40 PM
Original message
60 Minutes II didn't call Powell a liar just now.
They simply made the conclusion inescapable.

A man of honor would resign tomorrow.

Bet the lying lapdog Powell doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was stunning.
I turned on the computer to find out if anyone else saw that.

It really was as bad as we have been saying for months and months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Powell was told
no, the tubes were not for nuclear processing
no, the satellite pictures did not prove WMD programming
no, the trucks were just fire trucks

But Powell used all this any way. WOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. so the question arises
Why? Why did he knowingly lie?
Of course he wasn't acting as a loose cannon he must have had a directive.

I suppose Cheney and Bush will try to hang him out to dry too, but Bush also presented some of those same falsehoods. Did no one bother to tell him the aluminum tubes were not for WMD?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Why did he knowingly lie?
because he is a RW errand boy. has been his entire career.

he is totally devoid of the 'honor and integrity' it take to take a stand and do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Why did he lie and cover up the Mai Lai massacre?
Always a slave to duty, I guess....


(I'm sad that the double entendre I just used appears so very appropriate.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
41. Yep, same question. Makes him look like someone who
takes orders and obeys them no matter what. Treasury Sect. O'Neill bailed out, but Powell joined in the lies. Just like at My Lai.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #22
51. Never, ever forget My Lai
Never, ever forget who did it. Us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. basically
I was inferring that I don't think he took it upon himself to decide this, thus the next obvious question who directed him? (of course we know it probably came from Cheney)

Sort of following the Watergate scenario..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. cheney told him to go to the UN and lie his ass off and that's what he did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. It was obvious then that he was lying--and that he was forced
too do so.

It made me literally sick to my stomach, that's why I remember it so well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. impeachment
as it all unravels the case gets clearer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
47. But Isn't Lying About Terrorists/WMD A Patriot Act Violation?
BOOK HIM, DAN-O!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
48. Remember the thing where he read the speech and
said, "this is bullshit"? He compromised himself. Do they have something on him or is he really that weak?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. And this is only the tip of the iceberg....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. Yes, it was very stunning.
Half way through it, my hubby asked if I was taping it. Unfortunately, I wasn't because it will probably never be repeated. The way our heads were going it looked like we were watching a tennis match-- just shameful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
58. And maybe worse: there may not be enough fingers to plug all the holes
in their dike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. The media makes excuses over and over for this sorry SOB
Wonder when they'll finally stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sophree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. It looks like they just did. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. What exactly happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yep, fill us in
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. They have the story and video up at the 60 minutes II website
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. "Faith-based Intelligence"
Edited on Wed Feb-04-04 08:50 PM by aquart
Sixty Minutes interviewed the high security clearance guys who told Powell it was all bunk and one of them had the line of the day: "Faith-based Intelligence" because he believes the decision was made to go to war and the intel was tailored to fit that conclusion.

It was a slaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Short summary
Greg Tiellman(sp?), Powell's senior WMD intelligence analyst, said Powell was told a year before his prewar speech that there were no WMD in Iraq. Was told that the tubes were not for nuclear processing and was told that the satellite pictures were not proof of any WMD programs. Greg said part of the blame should be on the intelligence, but the major blame should be on the senior officials.

He also talked about the Chalabi intelligence group.

Good program. Just one year too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Tiellman also said
that Saddam wasn't even an imminent threat to his neighbors, let alone us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's right
Also, that scientist who examined the tubes for Powell said that he knew no weapons expert who would ever say the tubes would work in a nuclear program, they would leak. So Powell lied when he said there was some expert dispute. The only one that disputed it was Bush&Co.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I didn't realize til early last summer..............
that this was the reason that Isreal hadn't attacked Iraq before we could invade. Isreal will attack any neighbor that it considers a threat.

The Isrealis don't have War Resolutions or petition the UN for support or debate for weeks on end whether or not to invade or attack. If Isreal feels threatened, Isreal defends itself - and they don't care much about their image, either. Isreal could pretty much give less than a damn about a Zogby or Gallup Poll.

Isreal knew that Iraq wasn't a threat. I'd bet my last bit of money that their intelligence on their Arab neighbors is more accurate than the rest of the world's intelligence combined.

Impeach the bastard, already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
46. funny, Powell said the exact same thing in Spring of 2001
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 12:08 AM by maggrwaggr
http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2001/933.htm

"And frankly the sanctions have worked. He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors. "

You don't have much more of a smoking gun than that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
44. Thielman has been hammering away at this for over a year.
He was on Bill Moyers NOW.

Highly intelligent and gutsy. He was saying this when saying this wasn't cool ...., uh, cool outside of DU that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
59. "Frontline" had all this last fall
But more people watch 60 minutes, so I'm glad they're FINALLY getting with the program.

All this information was out there right after Powell's speech to the UN - but only in the print media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Unfortunately, the 60 Minutes II website doesnt' have much
Here's the page for the story

"The Man Who Knew"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/14/60II/main577975.shtml

They've got a little snippet of video, but I couldn't find a transcript.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. I think that basically IS the transcript.... It seemed complete to me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Hunh, They must have just put it up
It wasn't there earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. dang! and I turned off the TV
anyone who gets the whole transcript please post asap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. wasn`t it reported that
Powell called the report he read bullshit or something but went ahead anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. He called the original script from cheney bullshit
and had his own guys go thru it to "clean it up." Guess he didn't vet well enough, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. YES. Here:
Edited on Wed Feb-04-04 09:43 PM by Stephanie
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/060403B.shtml

Powell was Under Pressure to Use Shaky Intelligence on Iraq: Report
Agence France Presse

Friday 30 May 2003

US News and World Report magazine said the first draft of the speech was prepared for Powell by Vice President Richard Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, in late January.

According to the report, the draft contained such questionable material that Powell lost his temper, throwing several pages in the air and declaring, "I'm not reading this. This is bullshit."

Cheney's aides wanted Powell to include in his presentation information that Iraq has purchased computer software that would allow it to plan an attack on the United States, an allegation that was not supported by the CIA, US News reported.

The White House also pressed Powell to include charges that the suspected leader of the September 11 hijackers, Mohammed Atta, had met in Prague with an Iraqi intelligence officer prior to the attacks, despite a refusal by US and European intelligence agencies to confirm the meeting, the magazine said.

The pressure forced Powell to appoint his own review team that met several times with Central Intelligence Agency Director George Tenet and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice to prepare the speech, in which the secretary of state accused Iraq of hiding tonnes of biological and chemical weapons.

US News also said that the Defense Intelligence Agency had issued a classified assessment of Iraq's chemical weapons program last September, arguing that "there is no reliable information on whether Iraq is producing and stockpiling chemical weapons."

However, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told Congress shortly after that that the Iraqi "regime has amassed large, clandestine stockpiles of chemical weapons, including VX, sarin, cyclosarin, and mustard gas," according to the report.


(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Thielman Was on Aaron Brown Too Recently
This guy blows the whole thing wide open. I'm glad CBS is covering this. This guy needs to be on every show on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snappy Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Powell is a Disgrace.
Powell is a disgrace to the World, America and the US Military.
Powell sold his soul, dignity and credibilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. And yet
Even after all the lies are exposed, he stands there and says Bush did the right thing because "blah, blah, blah etc."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nomad559 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. I will record It
And post It for those that missed It.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Thank you, I would appreciate it very much.
Sounds like things are really starting to rumble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I missed it. I can host it if you want.
Let me know when it is done and I can put it up on muh website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nomad559 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. 60 Minutes 2
It will be a little while before It's done, It's 6:45 PM here In California.
60 Minutes 2 starts at 8:00.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. I just saw the story here in Arizona,
Powell needs to submit his resignation, and if he doesn't, the Dem leadership needs to pound this until he does.

And I want every Congressperson who voted for the IWR to denounce Powell and bush*!!

Yeah, and I hope I win the lottery tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
30. I watched his testimony before the UNSC. It was obvious that he KNEW
he was lying then. He seemed very uncomfortable.

Missed the 60 Mins. 2 piece--damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoceansnerves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
36. o'reilly
think o'reilly will bring this up on his program tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
38. As I remember it, Powell was against the war
then all of a sudden did a 180. Then there was the "bullshit" story just before his U.N. appearance.

Powell is history come November, one way or another. Will he tell his tale? Depends on how angry he gets after stewing over it once he's out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. Crap! What did I miss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
40. CBS is getting even with Powell's kid over the big pending fine!
I hope it turns in to an all-out brawl between CBS and the Bushco Crime Family! Dan Rather has been the most honest person in the media about Bushco/Halliburton's evil deeds in Iraq!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
42. "I'm not reading this. This is bullshit." - REPORTED JUNE '03
Powell's doubts over CIA intelligence on Iraq prompted him to set up secret review
Specialists removed questionable evidence about weapons from draft of secretary of state's speech to UN
Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington and Richard Norton-Taylor
Monday June 2, 2003
The Guardian

Fresh evidence emerged last night that Colin Powell, the US secretary of state, was so disturbed about questionable American intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction that he assembled a secret team to review the information he was given before he made a crucial speech to the UN security council on February 5.

Mr Powell conducted a full-dress rehearsal of the speech on the eve of the session at his suite in the Waldorf Astoria, his New York base when he is on UN business, according to the authoritative US News and World Report.

Much of the initial information for Mr Powell's speech to the UN was provided by the Pentagon, where Paul Wolfowitz, the US deputy defence secretary, set up a special unit, the Office of Special Plans, to counter the uncertainty of the CIA's intelligence on Iraq.

Mr Powell's team removed dozens of pages of alleged evidence about Iraq's banned weapons and ties to terrorists from a draft of his speech, US News and World Report says today. At one point, he became so angry at the lack of adequate sourcing to intelligence claims that he declared: "I'm not reading this. This is bullshit," according to the magazine.

Presented with a script for his speech, Mr Powell suspected that Washington hawks were "cherry picking", the US magazine Newsweek also reports today. Greg Theilmann, a recently retired state department intelligence analyst directly involved in assessing the Iraqi threat, says that inside the Bush administration "there is a lot of sorrow and anger at the way intelligence was misused".

<more>

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,968581,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
45. Was this program a rerun?
or delayed until now?

Asking because this article written on Wed. 15 Oct 2003 covers almost everything Mr. Thielman said on the program tonight - and makes a reference to the program being aired-

----------

>snip< Mr Thielmann made the claims on the CBS 60 Minutes II programme, which will be shown on US television tonight.

He said: “I think my conclusion (about Powell’s speech) now is that it’s probably one of the low points in his long distinguished service to the nation.

“The main problem was that the senior administration officials have what I call faith-based intelligence.

“They knew what they wanted the intelligence to show.

“They were really blind and deaf to any kind of countervailing information the intelligence community would produce.”
http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2055017

----------

Note: if you don't get a chance to watch the program, this article is definitely worth a read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #45
49. Yes, it was a rerun
I remember seeing the same interview with Thielman last summer on 60 Minutes Sunday. 60 Minutes commentary was updated though to include recent events surrounding this issue.

Thielman was also interviewed in an excellent Frontline documentary titled "Truth, War & Consequences. You can view it http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/truth/">here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #49
57. Thank you for the link.
The page didn't open correctly - for some reason it shows a double http://, but I figured it out.

Not going to watch it right now, it's bookmarked for later today. It's just too early in the day to add to the frustration of anger, helplessness and sadness still lingering from the small part of the 60 Minutes II interview I caught last night.

Thanks again.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
50. Do they have something on Powell?
I remember rumors about Powell possibly resigning several years ago. Suddenly he stayed put.

I can't stand what Powell has done, but out of everyone in Bush's evil admin, he is the only one that slips up and tells the truth every now and then.

He said there were probably no WMDs in 2001, he said the same thing the other day. He obviously didn't even want to bother with presenting the evidence to the UN. He also was the only one in the admin who wanted to use diplomacy rather than race into Iraq.

His collaboration in this right-wing conspiracy does not fit the positive image I had formed of him in the past (while seeing him on MTV, etc.). Hopefully he will redeem himself by coming forward in late October and exposing all of W's lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
52. He ought to be a shamed for putting his fellow military men at risk.
He is an accomplice to murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
53. I want to rejoice that the obvious is finally being broadcast
Then I remember all the dead; the maimed children in Iraq; the loss of the antiquities of that country; the US and allied soldiers who will come back changed people; the suicides; and much more.

All those remembrances make it impossible for me to rejoice.

It's time for some justice.

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
54. Anyone have this video yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nomad559 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. I posted It
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
56. The Case against Colin Powell has been out for quiet awhile
Read this powerfully article about Colin Powell and tell me why this guy should not be thrown out of office with junior and Cheney.

http://www.commondreams.org/views/122600-103.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC