|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:21 AM Original message |
LINK to Tenet Speech at 9:30 AM Eastern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcuno
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. Can't watch or listen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. I thought he was going to testify in front of the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganwitch
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. its easier?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:43 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Lying to a college crowd isn't illegal... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
76. makes a good excuse for the networks not to cover it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
5. On CNN too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
6. Tenet: "Intel estimate stated Saddam brutal dictator..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:47 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. "we are never completely right or completely wrong" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:47 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. "analysts never said there was an imminent threat" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:48 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. "No one told us what to say or how to say it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:53 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Ha! He's bringing up that pathetic Unmanned Aerial Vehicle... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Said plans were in place and could dispense Biological weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:12 AM Response to Reply #11 |
36. but there were also reports that most of the weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:18 AM Response to Reply #36 |
45. He cited "Intent" a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:54 AM Response to Reply #45 |
71. funny how that isn't how he and bushco presented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
12. Secrets talks with North Korea were taking place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:55 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Can't say what the aluminum tubes were for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:11 AM Response to Reply #13 |
34. ah but your folks and the DOE (energy) folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
32. which is why we supressed information about nkorea nukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
14. Post '96 Iraq reorganized to hide and be able to quickly deploy Bios |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:59 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Trailers-no consensus on them Human elements directed them there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Bringing up the son-in-law and says... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
16. Rovian speechwriters same old BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
17. Many discrepancies with human intel from before the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flubadubya
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:00 AM Original message |
Same old "Cover Bush's Ass" humdrum... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
18. Chem weapons-they thought he had them community skeptical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:01 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. aerial photos made many believe they were making Chems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:02 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. No weapons have been found WE NEED MORE TIME |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:06 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. we need more time is what the UN said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
displacedtexan
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
20. Constantly citing Iraqi officers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demgrrrll
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. The big question is WHY does he continue to cover for Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 12:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
83. Because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:17 AM Response to Reply #20 |
42. if we are talking about prewar intelligence... which officers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
22. Reliable source said inspectors would not stop Saddam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:04 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Scientists "Dabbling" in Chem weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:04 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Using oil for food and insecticide plants to make weapons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Said source was called reliable by foreign countries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Timefortruth
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:08 AM Response to Reply #22 |
30. How can that source still be considered reliable?nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
29. "When the truth emerges we will tell the American people NO MATTER WHAT" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:18 AM Response to Reply #29 |
44. just like you are doing now, Mr. Tenet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
31. Did Saddam's history cause us to disregard alternative explanations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:09 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Under inhouse review |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flubadubya
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
35. The world according to Tenet.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:13 AM Response to Reply #35 |
39. "Such is the nature of our business" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
37. Blanket indictive of our human sources is DEAD WRONG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:17 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Human sources into LYBIAN supply line key to Lybian admitting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oilwellian
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
38. Seeing the scrolling underpants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:17 AM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Gone now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
41. CYA CYA CYA CYA CYA CYA CYA CYA CYA CYA CYA CYA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:20 AM Response to Reply #41 |
48. Speech is over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
46. Leaves the Executive out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DifferentStrokes
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
47. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulfcoastliberal
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:28 AM Response to Reply #47 |
58. OSP - "No Facts Shaded" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:56 AM Response to Reply #47 |
72. at the time we were told... there was no time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
49. Blah,blah,blah.."Let's beat Villanova tonight" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
50. Q:HAs W made America safer with regard to the US and the Muslim world? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:23 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Over TWO ADMINISTRATIONS we have tried to bring people together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:45 AM Response to Reply #51 |
69. more like 50 years!...NOT "two administrations" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
52. IRG has determined Saddam was in material breach of 1441 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
53. Q:Difference in US and foreign analysis? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
54. Q: Uh -oh asking about OSP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:27 AM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Heh, you beat me by 1 second! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:27 AM Response to Reply #54 |
57. confirm or deny the existence of the OSP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:29 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. So what the heck is this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:32 AM Response to Reply #59 |
64. The student cited Mother Jones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:35 AM Response to Reply #59 |
66. Chickenhawks in Charge!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:41 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Oh that is hilarious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thoth
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 02:36 PM Response to Reply #59 |
87. EXCELLENT flow chart highlighting the OSP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
55. Uh oh, OSP rears its ugly head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flubadubya
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:30 AM Response to Reply #55 |
61. Ack! The A**hole denies OSP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:59 AM Response to Reply #61 |
75. So he goes on record with this lie.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flubadubya
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:20 AM Response to Reply #75 |
79. Clarification... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 12:06 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. I am not sure that I see the "out" for himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HootieMcBoob
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:31 AM Response to Reply #75 |
80. The guy who asked the question shouldn't have said "Mother Jones" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 12:07 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. hehe maybe he read my thread from the other day (I made that same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
60. Uh-oh one of them "longhairs" is asking the next questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:30 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Damn they just ended it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
63. "Awesome performance" about says it all, doesn't it? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
65. What theater! What acting! What a script! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
68. why is he speaking to a bunch of children! dubya tactics ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berry
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:09 AM Response to Reply #68 |
78. Definitely a friendly audience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichM
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
70. Was he defending just the CIA's reputation, or the whole Bush regime? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:56 AM Response to Reply #70 |
73. Establish Saddam's intent and reiterate history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:02 AM Response to Reply #70 |
77. from how it is reported here (by duers watching) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 01:32 PM Response to Reply #77 |
84. Yes salin he realy did say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 01:44 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. he closed that door |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
74. Facts simply don't bear him out, never did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oilwellian
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
86. Tenet needs to go before the Senate Intel Cmte. again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC