|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
ringmastery
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 06:56 PM Original message |
Isn't marriage a religious concept? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. Marriage was a civil contract. Always. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 06:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It still is a civil contract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
29. simply not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 01:42 AM Response to Reply #29 |
61. and that's civil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
3. That's my argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yes and no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eaprez
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. BUT......not all marriages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. marriage by clergy is simply an accomodation given to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eaprez
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. my point is they are not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:05 PM Original message |
I don't think that's true. But I'm not sure. I don't think the government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
15. But it is a fact that clergy cannot marry anyone without a license |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. You have it mixed up. Any church can marry anyone. But a marriage isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Well, perhaps I could have said it better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:38 PM Response to Reply #27 |
37. There are huge differences between what you and I were saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Uh oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Nothing says you can't perform a marriage but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. In many countries, the only legalmarriage is the civil one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Yes, but the difference here is that in most (if not all) states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
55. I don't think that's an accurate characterization. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
51. In Germany... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:50 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. This is important. See, governments evolved family law around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eaprez
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. Please articulate for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdguss
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I'm on the fence about civil unions: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. The right wing argument is that the marriage is the thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eaprez
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Maybe you're on to something! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
34. I know I'm on to something, and that it's very different from the way the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
31. My heterosexual friends who dislike the religious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:36 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Get rid of the quasi-religious JoP ceremony too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:41 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. That's exactly as it is now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:44 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Why isn't the registration enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:50 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. But you forget: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:54 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. I'm not sure if you're addressing anything I'm arguing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
33. Civil Unions vs. marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:37 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Full Faith and Credit applies to way more than marriages, and would apply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Never said it was "limited" to marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:50 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. It would apply to civil unions because the constitution says so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:09 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. kick. Any response? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:25 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Sorry. I was busy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:32 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. But what I'm arguing is from higher up. I'm arguing that we should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 09:51 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Not what I'm saying at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:38 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. There are two kinds of benefits of marriage: material and spiritual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeahMira
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 09:02 AM Response to Reply #46 |
68. Keep it simplest... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 10:40 AM Response to Reply #68 |
71. I think that's letting religion into your head just a little too much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. And whats so hard about just calling it a marriage? Its just semantics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. HOT OFF THE PRESSES: We can win standing up for what's right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. What's right is separating church from state. It will make a difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
12. Oh, and just for reference...my search for 'Civil Union' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eaprez
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. I thought Civil Union was two words? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
16. I don't see why it should have anything to do with religion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
21. I agree, but I've brought this issue up before here with a less than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DuctapeFatwa
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
22. Yes. However it is also a state-ercognized contract, from which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alopenia
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
26. God trumps all things secular particularly in the sacrament of marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roughsatori
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 07:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. I hope you forgot your sarcasm brackets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 12:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
80. Do you read Lisa Whelchel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
funky_bug
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
30. Answer me this, then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxr4clark
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
32. What matters is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
48. Because It's Not Equal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:09 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Thanks Allen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:52 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. It's not separation between church and state either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
50. Assignment for everyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
53. You mean atheists can't get married? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 12:01 PM Response to Reply #53 |
77. Do You Have (Or Plan On Having) Children? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
54. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SW FL Dem
![]() |
Thu Feb-05-04 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
58. You can get "married" by a judge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 12:04 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. because it's a symbolic secular substitute for the religious marriage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 02:23 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. it's not a "substitute" it is marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 02:39 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. That is not accurate. Every state in the union requires a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 09:08 AM Response to Reply #64 |
69. Texas doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 10:43 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Are you sure about that? Furthermore, this is what I'm arguing: lots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 10:55 AM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Yes. I'm sure about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 11:54 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. Here are the rules for CLM: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
60. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 02:40 AM Response to Reply #60 |
65. Before 1400 what authority was performing marriages? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 04:32 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. families, mostly, and the local "government" to some extent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 10:32 AM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Those aren't government authorities. And the church made most of the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
62. In China, it's never been religious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 02:44 AM Response to Reply #62 |
66. Most states recognize marriage by proxy in the US...but you have to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
74. Does carpentry require a Priest? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
resist
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
76. Both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
78. Same gender marriage DOES threaten marriages. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Fri Feb-06-04 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
79. buzzword schmuzzword...marriage started before religion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC