Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

a BBV question..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 08:32 PM
Original message
a BBV question..
Is the Dem party (as a whole) ready to do battle after the possibly squirrely numbers come in thsi November..

We already know that in EVERY single primary so far, the numbers have been HUGE. The press will keep spinning this as a "close race" right up until the election, even if they know it is NOT.. IT makes people feel the "need" to stay tuned in..

Since the "close race" is the spin, people might overlook the FACTS.. Is our leadership ready with lawyers to FIGHT the bogus results that will surely come tumbling in..

This election will be different from any recent one, because more places will be using machines without the paper necessary to have a real recount.. We need to be ready.. perhaps even pre-emptive..

My suggestion would be observers at EVERY polling stations to do their own exit polling..

There were exit polls taken at the primaries, but I would be willing to bet the farm that "something will go awry" like 2002.. We KNOW that some of those elections were very smelly, but there was very little , if any outcry..

This election is the "line in the sand" as far as I am concerned.. They got away with it in 2000, and again in 2002 ..Blatantly , at that..

If they do it again, we will lose a lot of the fired up voters that we have awakened..

Any of you with connections?? Please find out if there are any plans being made to counter this..

I just know that the repubes have their ducks in a row.. I am worried that we do not :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lastknowngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. No one it the "democratic leadership" will even raise their
voice. The pink tutu Dem's running this party should be ashamed to pick up their paychecks and bribes. They are disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Without a paper trail, a judge has few options.
Without a paper trail, a judge has few options, no matter how suspicious the results are.

There is no way to do a meaningful recount without voter-verified paper ballots.

Please click the link in my signature to email your Congressperson to pass The Voter Confidence Act.

We need to fix this BEFORE the election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ha!
Just like they challenged the goofy results that led to Max Cleland's ouster from office. Or some very odd results in certain parts of California during the recent recall election.

Without exit polls we'll have no idea what the real results are. I feel people are being primed with primary outcomes that are quite different from what the polls say immediately before, so we're all going to be willing to disregard polls as completely meaningless in the first place. Just one of the many ways the election in November can and no doubt will be stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virgil Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. I take paperless trails as proof of corruption
In my county they give you a pen and a piece of paper. You blot out a circle for your choice on each candidate and you run it through a scanner. It works fine. They never had a problem. The butterfly ballots and the punching holes might not have worked but nobody has ever complained about marking on a clearly designed ballot with a pen and running it through a scanner.

This was the "Remove the Paper Trail Act." It was no mistake or they would have corrected it. It has no sponsors in the Senate because they do not want paper trails. I call corruption. Nobody is going to tell me that not having a paper trail is acceptable. It is not. You do not hear it on the conglomerate media and that should tell you something. You do not have Kerry and Edwards talking about it either because it is indefensible with anything other than silence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. At the Florida Democratic Convention 2 months ago, both
At the Florida Democratic Convention 2 months ago, both John Kerry and John Edwards said they support a paper trail.

John Kerry also said he plans to sue for a paper trail at that time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Take it to the courts
Most states have laws about recounts. You can't recount an election on a touch screen that does not produce a voter-verified paper ballot. That's common knowledge now, and those machines violate recount provisions.

Be ready to demand recounts of the other systems, too. There are usually provisions to recount for parties in state laws, and you can ususually call for a recount if you pay for it.

Vote by mail or absentee if you can. It's far from foolproof but a heck of a lot less so than a DRE. It's also going to send a message that counties can spend a lot on touch screens, and see them not being used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC