Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seattle Times Endorses Joe Lieberrman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JailForBush Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:28 AM
Original message
Seattle Times Endorses Joe Lieberrman
Can you spell L-O-S-E-R? It's a lot shorter than either "Seattle Times" or "Joe Lieberman."

The Seattle Times is a double loser, because its endorsements are evolving into anchors as the public finally begings to notice the stench emanating from the Times.

This is the paper that endorsed George W. Bush in 2000. It also endorsed Governor Gary Locke (probably Washington's most corrupt governor ever), the most corrupt candidates who run for Seattle Mayor and on and on. The Times led the charge in conferring sainthood on Colin Powell's chum, the late (for anything but blackmail) retired general and Seattle Schools Superintendent John Stanford.

The Seattle Times' owner, Frank (or "Crank") Blethen, performed community service after he was accused of shooting a neighbor's dog. When his employees' went on strike, Blethen called in paramilitary forces.

He received some notoriety when he blasted a colleague with a particularly hostile and deranged e-mail. In short, the man's a kook - but a very powerful kook.

Seattle Times alumni now occupy seats on the Seattle City Council (gossip bitch Jean Godden), Seattle School Board (Tricky Dick Lilly) and Microsoft (John Hamer.)

Given the Seattle Times tawdry reputation, one has to wonder if its endorsement convinced Joe Lieberman to drop out of the presidential campaign. If so, we all owe the Seattle Times a big THANK YOU. Now go back to bed, Crank!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. HAHAHA FUCKC MAN
lieemangberan allaready dropped outt. hahaha

fuckk them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kerry and loser - loser is easier - one less letter in the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
westcoastbias Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. I Don't Subscribe
I live here and don't subscribe. They pander to the suburban affluent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Hi westcoastbias!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. What really used to bug me
is that the supposedly intelligent (Microsoft, Boeing, etc.) people of Seattle continue to consider the Times to be the newspaper of record. Bugged me until I moved away, that is. I never wasted my money on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JailForBush Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Intelligence is a weird thing.
I've met many people who are far smarter than me in terms of math, computers, medicine, etc. But when it comes to politics, these people simply fall off the edge of the earth.

Americans in general are stupid, but I think Seattlites are at rock bottom. It's hard to imagine anything dumber than a Seattle liberal. Until you ponder some of those right-wing religious kooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Who was that far-far right wing woman from a few years back?
Can't remember her name, but she had the backing of a lot of Seattle society. She was the one who truly believed the End Times are here, etc. I remember reading somewhere how much money she had raised, and it astounded me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JailForBush Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ellen Craswell?
She's one of the Eastern Washington religious kooks I referred to. She ran for Governor and was probably supported by most of Seattle's conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. America is stupid largely because of our media.
But this is REALLY bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelzRule Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. I never buy that stinkin' rag
Cancelled my subscription during the strike and never renewed. Their endorsements usually disgust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Did you ever see a copy of the strikers' paper?
They printed up a paper during the strike. Can't remember what it was called, but it was really pretty cool to pick up a newspaper that was flagrantly pro-labor. It was like going back in time eight decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. WTF?
Did they endorse Holy Joe AFTER he dropped out? Did they not hear the news, or ... ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldebaran Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Blethen family fortune
Ever since they figured that bush would eliminate the "death tax", the paper has been disgusting. They still publish Doonesbury, maybe they think people will figure they're still "liberal" even as they endorse bush and Lieberman.

The PI (Hearst owned!) has actually been pretty good, particularly on the editorial side.

As an aside, the two papers have a joint operating agreement, with the Times having all the muscle, and they're trying to shut the PI down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC