|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
DeepModem Mom
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:52 AM Original message |
MTP theory : W did well, w/ tough questions known in advance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
1. Exactly My Assessment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakfs
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
2. Do we know for sure... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. I doubt they'd admit the questions were seen in advance, Wakfs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. No, just my gut feeling, based on W's previous unscripted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
3. Bush has been briefed since Monday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
4. but the whole point was to gain votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. I agree. Turd Blossom Rove is going to be disappointed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poskonig
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
5. Bush sounded like a buffoon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onecitizen
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
6. We must not have seen the same........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleApple81
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I agree with you. But the Face the Nation analysis points to a "success" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asjr
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Bob Schiefer is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. I thought he spoke better than usual (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jean
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
7. you're right. He seemed canned, prepackaged and ready for delivery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
9. Bush came off horribly!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slor
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
11. If that was a good interview... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
14. just imagine if a DEMOCRAT performed like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlin
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
15. Folks, you have to remember: You Are Not Typical Voters! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ant
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
16. not necessary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. My opinion of W's knowledge, and ability to speak... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bacchant
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
18. Obviously a squirming liar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
20. A differing viewpoint: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tableturner
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
22. Anyone could see he lied and evaded..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
23. Bush benefits from low expectations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meg
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
24. I disagree about him sounding articulate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC