|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:04 PM Original message |
Famous Last Words: "I don't testify." - GWB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. What A Coincidence, I Also Thought That Was The WORST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wickerman
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. recommendations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovedems
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yep. He doesn't testify and he won't lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamond14
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
4. IMO, that was the line......bush* will fall from his own words....like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Sociopaths don't feel guilt or impact from the memory of their actions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:36 AM Response to Reply #11 |
49. He doesn't want to testify because he doesn't DARE go under oath. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 12:06 AM Response to Reply #49 |
67. Yup, he be fucked from the start. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:30 AM Response to Reply #4 |
62. I'm sure that Bush* just like his mother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fleetus
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
5. Missed the interview... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
belle
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Shades of Leona Helmsley there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. 'i don't testify' he's regurgitating the GROUND RULES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfranklin
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. You pegged it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. I think he means it in the broadest context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinkpops
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
7. Didn't Bush say something once before about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Yup - from Woodward's book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamond14
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. American Justice Jackson at the Nuremberg War Trials 1945 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
43. Can you imagine how many dock's full of traitors we will have before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamond14
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:24 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. many went to PRISON for Watergate...which was a 'little' crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catshrink
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:20 PM Original message |
Is he saying that POTUS doesn't testify? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
15. Frog march for sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTwentyoNine
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
9. This idiot really thinks he's totally above the law... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buycitgo
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. see......he won't ever be tried for the 500+ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
12. Watergate redux |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soup
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
16. In all fairness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:03 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I'll listen again, but it struck me right away the first time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soup
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:18 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Please do. I sure wouldn't mind being wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Will check. But look, we have pix |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
63. A prick is a part of a man! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:23 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. LOL - but look at how teensy weensy he is in that photo next to Potatohead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:46 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. There's some video available here but I can't play it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soup
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. I must have the wrong media player. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:06 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Slightly different in the full transcript, but with "?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
belle
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Okay, so he's drunk and/or brain dead instead of arrogant. Make that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soup
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. I hear ya. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTwentyoNine
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. He stumbles around but sure doesn't say he will testify...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soup
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:10 PM Response to Reply #16 |
32. I AM WRONG. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:13 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Yay! That's what I thought I heard - now I'd like to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soup
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:25 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Sorry to be a pain about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:38 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. I heard it this morning, and I copied the quote from TIA's thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:51 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Check it out! WaPo transcript, NO question mark: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soup
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:18 AM Response to Reply #41 |
46. FINALLY, found a video online. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:39 AM Response to Reply #46 |
54. So now I'm wondering, what's with the MTP transcript? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soup
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 06:40 AM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Makes me wonder, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 12:30 AM Response to Reply #58 |
68. kicking - transcript seems questionable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soup
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 01:38 PM Response to Reply #68 |
74. Link to other thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
25. He doesn't have to testify. He is ordained by God. Remember? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Me too. This is why I hate him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
One Taste
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
66. Do you have a link to that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
26. In other words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:56 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Why would that be HIS choice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTwentyoNine
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
34. That's exactly where Russert should have hit him with a follow up.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:17 AM Response to Reply #34 |
45. Russert a reporter? Surely you jest! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CO Liberal
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
35. And He Doesn't Go to Super Max Either.....Right??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
36. Aside from the irrational arrogance of this remark, what I really want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AVID
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
38. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:37 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Hey bigsky! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
42. That's right. He doesn't have to answer any questions, remember? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zo Zig
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
47. Follow up question, Tim? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
48. And Clinton had to go under oath based on SEX accusations???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
50. The logical next step |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:14 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. LOL, the Madman calls Saddam a madman,,,, ROTFLMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:38 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. I saw two talking heads... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:42 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Remember when they dragged Hillary in to testify? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
52. Testify!?! Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kickin_Donkey
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 03:34 AM Response to Original message |
56. After Bush is thrown out on his ear in November ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:12 AM Response to Reply #56 |
61. yeah - must be genetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmr
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 05:36 AM Response to Original message |
57. Imagine President Clinton saying that to Ken Starr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusty64
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
59. He knows its a complete sham |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laylah
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
60. I wonder how the hypocritical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
65. He testifies his "faith" all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oilwellian
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 02:10 AM Response to Original message |
69. This is an excellent thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
70. No One, IS, above the law! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
71. those are the words that struck me, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
9215
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
72. Ambiguity here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 01:08 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Well, reading it is one thing and listening to him say it is another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
75. Someone on each campaign needs to get this thread to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC