|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Cascadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:28 PM Original message |
Should America be a multiparty democracy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, obviously I am in favor of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastknowngood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. The problem is were fast headed to a one party system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arlington (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. I have two questions about your post..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. How to improve political freedom in the US... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cascadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Also have a Question Period |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MAlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. I take issue with unicameral parliaments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cascadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. There can still be plenty of checks and balances in a unicameral system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. *whistle* The only unicameral in the US is Nebraska, not Kansas.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cascadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-09-04 12:11 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. OK Nebraska. My bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arlington (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. agree on the electoral college |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. Only with a parliamentary system to go with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Great point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MAlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
8. Our electoral system prevents new parties from starting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mot78 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
10. The problem is that we'd see unstable coalition goverments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
not systems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
13. Yes. Voting reforms are needed to make this happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
16. We already can have as many parties as people want to have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-08-04 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. Have you ever talked to a Republican? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Oct 18th 2024, 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC