|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:25 AM Original message |
When will the Democratic Party address the think tank "problem"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
central scrutinizer
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
1. think tank is a misnomer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. You are still being too kind. They are Propaganda Mills |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
2. SoCal, they are already starting/started |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:14 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I mentioned his think tank.....BUT.... why are they not on c-span too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. They send out 3000 press releases a day, and are quoted in WP and NYT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. wow, great work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. A good start, but we got a ways to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:31 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. And. a lot of "our" organizations claim to be "non-partisan" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanana
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:35 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. I love that website |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
6. "...they've put billions of dollars into it." (the RW that is) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmbryant
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
10. This is really a media problem, not a think tank problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:48 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Missing the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmbryant
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I got the point :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
13. There have been several started recently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StopThief
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
14. The reason your search. . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. ..or even in their own literature.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. We are playing catchup with the Pubs who are 20+ years ahead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC