as a graduate student, and I gotta tell ya, we're in deep shit here.
Any candidate who criticizes the media is immediately buried (see: Dean, Kucinich, et al) and this is for a very good reason. The media have much at stake. The reporters are all covering their asses, living in fear of their "big daddy" corporate bosses, and the media is doing exactly what serves its own interests. Do they make money by producing the best darn newscast you ever saw? hahahaha
Some of you may have seen a recent story about how the NRA is trying to buy a television station. Regardless of what you think of the NRA, the fact is, they didn't want a TV station. They wanted the "media exception" -- an exception that media companies get to FCC regulations and Campaign finance regulations.
So who is a media company? There is no such thing. MS-NBC-GE -- refrigerators, bombs, light bulbs . . . media. GE gets the media exception, but it is easy to argue that their primary business is everything but. Plus, they are convicted felons. There is no such thing as a media company, except maybe PBS and a few independent filmmakers and guerrilla artists and brilliant creative citizens, like the folks who entered the Move-On contest.
So the media speak as corporations, not independent watchdogs, the ideal as imagined by our founders. It is still described on the site for the Society for Professional Journalists but read it and weep. There is no other word to describe it but fascism.
I agree with many others who feel that there will be no real reform in this country until we take back our airwaves. My proposal is that a media company should be ONLY a content provider in order to be granted the media exception. Then we would really have content creators competing on the basis of the quality of their content. What a thought.
Jeanette
http://www.wgoeshome.com