|
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 03:11 PM by Brotherjohn
Of this new alleged al-Zarqawi memo to Al Qaeda, that is?
Remember the memo allegedly from the head of Iraqi intel to Saddam which, in two measly paragraphs, admitted that Iraq: - Sponsored Mohammed Atta for a visit to Iraq - Put him up in noted terrorist Abu Nidal's house - Trained him in terrorist techniques - Directly supervised him (the memo made reference to this several times, just to make sure we knew) - Expressed satisfaction that he was progressing well and would succeed in hitting the targets that Iraq had approved - Admitted that Iraq had intercepted an unnamed shipment from Niger - Said that this shipment was obtained with the help of Libya and Syria, and a small group "from the Al Qaeda organization" - Pointed out that this all came to fruition thanks to a meeting between Hussein and the president of Syria
Boy, that was awfully convenient. It just validates the whole PNAC agenda in one, tiny little memo. Trouble is, it's also been widely debunked as a forgery, as if it's over-the-top obviousness didn't tell you that. The only thing that could have made it more obvious as a forgery would be if it closed with: "Please DO NOT let this memo fall into the hands of the almighty American forces and their fearless leader, George W. Bush, or our entire evil scheme will be foiled" (insert visual equivalent, in Arabic characters, of the writer twisting his handlebar moustache and grinning) Please also notify our friends in France and at the U.N. that our plans are going according to schedule, and suggest to Ms. Clinton that she perhaps make sure she is not in Manhattan or Washington, D.C., on September the 11th."
Besides, if that memo were authentic, the administration would have at least mentioned it. Correction: they'd be shoving it in all our faces... and actually, rightfully so (IF it were real).
If this current al-Zarqawi memo to Al Qaeda has similarly obvious and ridiculously revealing language, I'd think it's likely a forgery, too. But I guess forces sympathetic to the Bush administration in Iraq are learning not to overreach so much, since at least this memo's premise is believable. We would expect U.S. enemies to attempt to come together in the face of attack.
But to sit there and praise the enemies' intelligence in the memo? That's where it starts to sound fishy.
|