This is a very interesting analysis of Bill Calhoun. If he did come forward in 2000, why didn't the Bush campaign use the information then? And even if they did decide it wasn't necessary (after all the press wasn't covering the story), why didn't they bring it up weeks ago. Why didn't someone come out and say, we have Bill Calhoun as a witness to Bush's time in Alabama. Why didn't Bush say on Meet the Press, "Tim, why don't you give Bill a call. He'll vouch for my time in his office reading technical magazines."
And why did McClellan dodge the subject of Calhoun during the most recent press conference? Didn't he say that the reporters would have to call Calhoun to find out about the discrepancy between when Bush claimed to be in Alabama and when Calhoun claimed he was there. After repeated questions of why is there no one who can say they saw Bush in Alabama, didn't McClellan say earlier--We have someone! Good 'ole Bill Calhoun! Give him a call!
http://bottleofblog.typepad.com/bottleofblog/2004/02/well_reelect_yo.html