It must be true: NewsMax published book claims Hillary is running in 2004

[LynneSin]

:eyes:

http://www.newsmaxstore.com/nms/showdetl.cfm?&DID=6&Product_ID=1421&CATID=1&GroupID=1

Let's do some simple math here sheepies!

Right-wingers LOVE LOVE LOVE to contribute to any cause that is against anyone with the last name of Clinton. But with no Clinton officially running for an office in 2004 the contributions are running low. Their attempts to replace George Clinton, King of Funk with Wayne Newton failed miserably and they need a new source of funds.

Hence NewsMax's own published book that INSISTS that Hillary is running in 2004. Hey, I'd vote for Hillary if she was running, but she isn't - she has said it 10 million times she's not running and why would Hillary risk her political career by rescinding a promise she made to the people of New York? If she were to run in 2004, she would never be elected again in New York as a senator since she told the folks of NY she wasn't running; heck she wouldn't be able to run in any other state for that matter.

But Neo-Cons have to keep hope alive that a Clinton could be running for president so they can keep funding their causes. It was amusing a few years ago, but now it just shows how pathetic this group really is!

BTW, expect this book to make the NYTimes bestseller list with a big ole (+) next to it. Neo-cons will be buying this in bulk and giving it away

[RobertSeattle]

1. Yep, they check, then recheck, then double check the facts!

...Not!

[StClone]

2. Primal Fears

The Right does function on a primal level. Why incite their gut fear of the name Clinton? When none is about they are content to adhere to their droll existence.

For '04 Hillary should lay low and not give them the benefit of fight response.

[realFedUp]

3. Pulp fiction

I would love it if she did though.

[PATRICK]

4. A Dick Morris thing too

Playing the Clinton insider he keeps sticking the notion up there, probably playing both sides if Hillary was EVER tempted to rehire the thug. This time he would stab her in the back of course unless the need to win overcame his few convictions.

This is one of a series(and admittedly impatient people here play the game too) of jumping the gun with no acknowledgment of the power of the REAL primaries once they begin. No more value than the buzz about the new X-Men movie and who should play the roles.

Name recognition is a stupid premise. Frontrunner(thank god we have none this time)is another goat. We really do have a fine choice with able and sincere lesser alternatives, probably with a greater depth than we have ever had in my memory. Everyone seems to have something strong and creative to contribute. Doubts arise mainly from our awful situation and finding it hard to credit a champion when they have not significantly stopped Bush in their smaller roles. We are anxious for that center stage to be filled. Keep it free of clutter and childish predictions. Someone may blow their chances with a campaign misstep. The goddawful money hunt may become too important. There are no darkhorses better than the present candidates. IMHO.