|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
2004Donkeys
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:21 PM Original message |
Did anti-war activists seem indifferent on Saddam's atrocities? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. Who the heck are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeahMira
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. Htuttle, help me out with this please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 08:53 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. That's one of the issues humanity needs to confront this century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeahMira
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maggrwaggr
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
37. The USSR had nukes. They had WMD's. They were a threat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snow
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
2. No! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theoceansnerves
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
3. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shoedogg
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hmmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damnraddem
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
5. No, the general line was to acknowledge them, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. Not the ones I know and talk to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
7. Atrocities was not the justification for war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
8. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillZBubb
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. Some were dismissive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
10. There were a few, but I think the big, vast, majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinnypriv
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
11. "some" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
12. anti-war activists bent over backwards to acknowledge that Saddam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
13. SF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KelleyKramer
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
14. I was concerned when Rumsfeld met with Saddum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. You nailed it. Excellent post! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
15. Context. Besides, George H W Bush was pretty indifferent too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
16. No, back in the days when Rummy had his picture taken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
18. I think you have fallen for the right wing lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ithacan
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
19. Saddam committed his worst atrocities when the GOP supported him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudnclear
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
20. No more "indifferent" than the Reagan/Bush administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rustydog
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
21. Your question should be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oilwellian
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
24. So, 2004Donkeys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 11:29 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Deleted message |
leesa
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
25. I doubt this is true. Saddam was no doubt a bad guy, but I highly doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dpibel
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
26. I Confess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beanball
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
28. "The butcher of Baghdad" VS "The butcher of the Palestine" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbyboucher
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
29. Oh pshaw. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kinkistyle
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
30. One end of scale: Weakened Saddam, on other end: all-out civil war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brian Sweat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
32. No, we were not indifferent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
33. It's disingenuous to bring up Saddam's "Atrocities".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2004Donkeys
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 07:32 AM Response to Reply #33 |
40. Since when did mass murder and torture have a statute of limitations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DinahMoeHum
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
34. We were shedding light on Saddam's atrocities in the 1980's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markus
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
35. This was such a transparent attempt to change the subject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
36. This post is pure flame-bait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke
![]() |
Tue Feb-17-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Not the first flame-bait post by this originator..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2004Donkeys
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 07:29 AM Response to Original message |
39. Check out this poll and then tell me again that my analysis was false |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 07:40 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Where's the apology? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 07:48 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 07:57 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Deleted message |
2004Donkeys
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 07:59 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Read my PM blondeatlast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeahMira
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 08:04 AM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Ah! Another poll... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2004Donkeys
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 08:17 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. It was actually the Democrats in the 1980s who put these atrocities ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 08:23 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. On that, we can agree. But I still see the invasion as a simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradCKY
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
48. We shouldn't have gone to war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diamond14
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
49. here's the WHOLE explanation in a nutshell....(video and photo) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zero Gravitas
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
50. The was was never about "atrocities" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn
![]() |
Wed Feb-18-04 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
51. No, but the Bush Administration certainly was/is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC