Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Steve Forbes on Crossfire.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:43 PM
Original message
Steve Forbes on Crossfire.
Does this guy guy creep anyone else out? He has one wierd robotic look in his eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. He is a snake...


Anyone that wants a flat tax is a fascist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. hmmm... not sure I agree with you on that one
no offense, of course. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. Gad Hes ugly
Im sorry but when I look at him I get ill. The man is homely and his politics match
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. The flat tax is a scheme designed by the rich...


If you aren't very educated about it, it seems like an ok idea.

Once you look into it, you realize pretty quick that it would be the end of this country if it evre passed.

Anyone who proposes it is a con-artist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. how so?
I'm really not sure I agree with you. I'm not a fan of taxes, in general, and I believe that we could have cadillac health and human services if we'd just stop wasting money on the military and law enforcement.

Just my opinion, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Just a comment
The guy who wrote the "Barely Legal" book thinks (it hard to prove since it gets very complicated) we probably "net" have a "flat tax" now - meaning if you lop in all the local, state, and Federal taxes and all the loopholes the rich use; the poor, the middle class, and the rich probably pay about a 20% overall tax.

The one interesting "flat tax" idea is the flat tax where the first 50K or so isn't taxed.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Agree only if investment/cap gain money counted at 100% & replace SS
payroll tax is included in replace "all the local, state, and Federal taxes"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's the botox stare... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes...
he creeps me out. Someone else who pulled himself up by the bootstraps...NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quispquake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Michael Moore did a great piece on Forbes
On his show "The Awful Truth", Moore noticed that Forbes NEVER BLINKS! He then showed many weird looks of Forbes...a funny skit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. omg!!!
look at what I posted at reply #12!!

bwahahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joyautumn Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thicker than water
I don't trust any of John Forbes Kerry's first cousins, because among the power elite, blood is thicker than water, and water is thicker than their loyalty to the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toby109 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I don't believe they are even related
much less first cousins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Different Forbes family, I think
I'll research it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joyautumn Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. stuart not steve
my mistake -- i was thinking of stuart forbes, kerry's first cousin who is CEO of Colliers International, as referred to in this article from the Center for Public Integrity that mentions Kerry pushing normalization of ties with Vietnam, then Vietnam granting a billion-dollar contract to Kerry's first cousin's company Colliers:

http://www.bop2004.org/bop2004/candidate.aspx?cid=4

so it's Stuart Forbes I don't trust. Steve is off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supercrash Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Jeeesh
He is defending the Bush job record...what a losing battle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. He said over two million jobs have been CREATED under Chimp.
There is a guy who comes to my house whenever it snows to shovel the driveway, he also comes by and asks to rake leaves or do anything for money. There have been times he has asked to borrow money for child support, it was humiliating for both of us. I can't afford to have him do much because I pay him $10 an hour and we're not in a class that can afford hired help.

In Steve Forbes world the guy who comes to my house is another of the self-employed new jobs created by Bush. In my mind the guy is trying to avoid begging for money when he asks to do work that doesn't really need to be done.

I do hate Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Bush 3% forecast is 3.8 m jobs in 04 - we got 118k in Jan - Forbes
is as nuts as his Dad

The Net of over 2 million jobs created and over 4 million jobs lost is 2.2 million jobs lost.

I bet no one pointed that out!

And did any note the math challenged Bush saying he can't sign on to his Econ Advisors 2.6 million job creation in 04, somehow forgetting that the reports 3% job growth implies 3.8 million net new jobs, not 2.6 million.

Of course our media is running with the 2.6 m number, because they are not paid to think! - And the 2.6 million number is already sounding silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Did he talk about NET jobs created or just JOBS created?
Big effin' difference. There probably has been 2 million jobs CREATED, but, and it's a BIG BUT, there have been 4 - 5 million jobs LOST!!

Also, can we get the definition of CREATED? If someone loses there job and someone else is hired to take that job, has a job been "created"?

Or is a job created only when an actual NEW position is offered? Like seasonal hiring. Which leads to how to count that seasonally "created" job when the season ends? Is it UN-created?

Bottom line - bush* = economic disaster and no amount of creepy-ooking-repuke spin can "create" an answer to that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. He redefined what a job is, so then he could claim all the currently
used statistics are false. He said payroll should not be an indicator of jobs, the new jobs are held by the self employed and aren't counted.

That's why I described the guy who comes to my house. As far as I could tell Forbes would consider him employed, but not on a payroll.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Also you can't prove the self employed story nor can you disprove it
It seems to me a convenient way for the right to get off the hook. Just say that those who were previously unemployed now are self employed which of course they are not unless you mean like your guy. Actually they lost their unemployment so they are no longer counted.


It gets me that a guy like Forbes who has all the money he could spend wants more. I work for a guy like that and it seems that they never have enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. So basically he said if you are UNEMPLOYED you are actually
SELF-EMPLOYED!

I suppose looking for a job, or not looking for that matter, is now A JOB!

Good for bush*, I hope he picks that up and declares unemployment 0% and employment 205%!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. Never, ever trust a man
who doesn't blink.

This guy's eyes NEVER blink.

Is he a cyborg or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. Steve Forbes?!? Was Norquist unavailable?
Seriously, Steve Forbes? WHO CARES?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. I know exactly what you are talking abou, maveric
snake eyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. I was thinking the very same
thing. Doesn't he look like a character from one of Stephen King's books? He is such a creep, and of course a serious liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. He has a manly, Victor Mature-like aroma
Wait. That was Teeve Torbes.

:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
26. He was offensive to my intelligence
He actually said something along the lines of
Tax cuts increase federal revenue ...:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. hes offensive to my eyes.
What an ugly man inside and out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. What were the first words out of his white-winger mouth?
Clinton/Gore recession. He babbled that same crap on Lou Dobbs the other night and Lou told him to quit that nonsense it's three years later. Forbes still had that stupid smirk on his face. Same old tired supply side bull..tax cuts increase government revenues, economical expansion..blah blah blah. I think he's on Limpball's Oxy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. he gives me the creeps... just like bush does....permanent smirks
make me want to punch them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC