Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

what is a pedophile?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 10:59 PM
Original message
what is a pedophile?
I just saw a tv story on CNN about 'child sex trade' and they kept referring to pedophiles. But the " children" they kept showing were 16 &17yo, sexually active street hustlers, hardly being sold as sex slaves as the progam purported(in all honesty there were a few a bit younger.) I would call them 'jailbait' and the johns 'chickenhawks', but I believe there is another name more appropriate than pedophiles, (which I always believed was for those who liked pre-pubescents)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JailForBush Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I ascribe two meanings to the word pedophile.
In the broadest sense, I define it as anyone who preys on people who are young and vulnerable - and not just sexually. I regard corporate executives and corrupt politicians as "corporate pedopohiles," because their exploitation can be truly ferocious, and they often create or protect conditions that foster true pedophilia.

Examples include Washington State's Wenatchee Witch-Hunt and just about any urban school district in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I saw that special too the other night
Crazy shit going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. An interesting side item
Ind. Paper Stands Behind Sex Offender Coverage

By Joe Strupp

Published: February 20, 2004

NEW YORK Editors at The Star Press in Muncie, Ind., stood behind their controversial decision to publish names, addresses and Page One photos of local residents who are on the state's convicted sex offender registry, calling the approach a public service that has the most reader impact.

"It is public information and we felt people had the right to know who is living where," said Douglas Walker, the paper's metro editor. "Their own actions resulted in their being placed on the registry."

But the move drew criticism from some journalism ethics experts, who questioned whether the paper went too far in exposing the sex offenders to potential harm or retaliation.

"They are serving a portion of their public by seeking the truth and reporting it," said Gary Hill, chair of the Society of Professional Journalists Ethics Committee, who compared the publicity to putting criminals in public stocks. "But if you believe that any of these people have a chance for rehabilitation, you are doing considerable harm."

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=2096073
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Make a call to the WH...
there's a LOT of them there..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. well . . . my understanding is . . .
a pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children . . .

a pederast is someone who is sexually attracted to pubescent children and/or adolescents . . .

a child molester is someone who molests children . . . s/he may or may not be a pedophile or a pederast . . . conversely, being a pedophile or a pedarast does not necessarily make one a child molester since many (perhaps most) never act on their proclivities . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. 16 and 17 years olds are still children
despite their being forced into things inappropriate to their years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. In the UK (and probably nearly all Europe)
16 is the legal age of consent (lower in some European countries), so this would not be regarded as an age problem at all. Some people are now suggesting lowering the voting age to 16 for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. And yet...
Edited on Sun Feb-22-04 09:49 AM by sweetheart
The new laws in britain put a teenager on the sex-offenders
list for having sex with a person a year younger... (like a 16 with
a 15) and this is really a perversion of the law. It makes
underage kids permanently screwed for a lifetime for doing what a
good many people have done themselves if they're honest about
teenage sex.

Interestingly, at the thurso mothercare (city in britain maternity shop)
You can see a queue of underage mothers, and funnily, due to
a falling population, there are those who think 14 years old and
pregnant is good for the economy.

Young pregnancy hobbles womens lives and permanently relegates them
to low paid jobs and semi poverty (without family assistance). In
this regard, i am for comprehensive sex education and abortion
services to teenage men and women. Wanting to have sex is perfectly
natural, and healthy, like smelling flowers. Like drugs, there are
better ways to help kids mature without criminalization for being
alive.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I agree the British laws aren't right
and should take into account age difference in some way for what is and isn't a sexual offence. Your analysis seems pretty good. I'd never heard the 'good for the economy' line before - scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. I agree, and it doesn't matter who does the forcing; corporationns
like Nike and A&F are just as guilty as the pimps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shooga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. ask GHWB ...
... I hear he likes the young'uns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. You might want to ask Dyn Corp
that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. ephebophile?
i remember hearing that term tossed around during some of the discussion of pedophile priests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. That is the correct term
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. thanks,
I knew chickenhawk and jailbait were wrong. So was CNN's special- dishonest was more like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. You're right: paedophile is reserved for those fixated on pre-pube kids
Whoever wrote the script for the show is either confused or dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. Technically speaking,
pedophilia refers to a preoccupation with pre-pubescent kids.

Hebephilia is an attraction to underage but pubescent/post-pubescent kids. The current DSM doesn't classify hebephilia as a disorder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. animal hormones
I have a female dog (bitch) coming in to her first heat. My dog (male) is interested in her. I'm making a special dog coat for her that he won't be able to shag her.

I think that with higher brain functions beyond dogs, that humans also experience a feremone attraction to "heat"... and that this is
entirely natural, just the "crime" is to act on ones animal instinct with someone younger than the legal age of choice.

My first sexual experience was with another kid in kindergarten, which we called "playing doctor" at the time. It was innocent as
we did not know it was even sexual. The kids involved in
the kindergarten "medical clinic" were just curious about their
bodies.

At age 15, i was molested by an adult 20 years my senior, and this
was an entirely less than positive experience, one that affected my
views towards sexuality quite negatively, and left me afraid. I
remember taking a long long shower afterwards trying to wash it off.
I would not wish that on any person, and agree that hebephilia is
a crime, but less one than with a young child.

That said, i see it as no crime for a 15 year old to make out with a
14 year old, as geesh, kids in puberty do that, and it does not
count in my eyes as a crime. That said, when an 18 years old has sex
with a 17 year old, i don't see that as a crime.

I think the relative age difference is quite important.

I also think the paedophilia thing has gone too far towards paranoia.
I will not touch a child, even though kids are very tactile... as all
contact with kids is potentially paedophila, and it is not worth
giving a kid a hug... this is really sad, the ultimate result, that
People who would help children and love them, are discouraged from
doing so, and geesh, of all things, a little more love is the best
healthy thing for kids.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Being attracted to teenagers isn't probably a disorder
In reading the book "The Red Queen" about the evolution of sex and mating strategy in humans, men are usually attracted most to either women in prime fertility (mid 20's) or younger women who are just becoming fertile (which in many "primitive" cultures is around 15 or 16). Men who marry these teenagers are assured that their first child will be theirs. This is adaptive.
I don't think that it is right for adult, especially middle aged and above, to take advantage of young women this way though. They may physically ready and want to have sex at this age, but bad early experience with father figures can really mess them up.
Advertising in our culture seems to sexualize young women and encourage the idolization of teenagers. The instinct is there but I think that advertising and entertainment encourage this.
Physically depending on the teen, a 15 or 16 year may look older than an 18 year old. I think we are hypocritical if we encourage men to have sex with 18 and 19 year olds while saying they are wrong for wanting to sleep with 16 and 17 year olds.
It is wrong to use immature people, but it is not a mental illness if they are physically mature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cannikin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. I think the American Family Association has some first hand expertise...
Edited on Sun Feb-22-04 09:39 AM by Cannikin
with pedophiles...since one of their anti-gay group founders was arrested for molesting a little girl.

Ask them!


www.afa.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC