I am just delighted to hear your story, and know that you are on board. :hi: It makes me just that much more hopeful.
And, to get back to the original post, I agree that negativity is dangerous. I immediately thought about that article in The Nation about how Bush* uses language to terrify the American people by painting a darkly negative picture of the dangerous world that he then assures us only he can save us from. (It reminds me of the story, possibly apocryphal, of Christian missionaries in China having to first convince their potential converts that they were full of original sin. Only then would salvation be seen as necessary.)
Somebody posted a shorter article based on the original one, that makes the "be optimistic" point even more strongly. I'll have to come back to add the links if I can find them.
OK. Here is the original Nation article (I think):
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=16220And here is the article about the Nation article (with some excerpts):
http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/newssentinel/news/editorial/6401294.htm <<In her article in The Nation, Brooks wrote: Bush frequently sets up a ``negative framework,'' or pessimistic image of the world. ``Catastrophic words and phrases are repeatedly drilled into the listener's head until the opposition feels such a high level of anxiety that it appears pointless to do anything other than cower.'
'It's a learned helplessness ``exacerbated by beliefs that problems caused by negative events are permanent; and when the underlying causes are perceived to apply to many other events, the condition becomes pervasive and paralyzing.''`
`Bush is a master at inducing learned helplessness in the electorate. He uses a pessimistic language that creates fear and disables people from feeling they can solve their problems.''
Breaking the cycle will take a language of hope and optimism, Brooks told me. Civilization has overcome tough times without dominators.No doubt good people will triumph again.>>