|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 05:32 AM Original message |
Gay marriage: "Separate but equal" is unacceptable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsw_81
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
1. Here's the current political reality: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foreigncorrespondent
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:01 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. All the stats show is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grave Expectations
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. I disagree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foreigncorrespondent
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 11:30 AM Response to Reply #14 |
44. Then you obviously haven't seen... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
djg21
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Nicely Put |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:01 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. How about separate water fountains, too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:10 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Why is it so hard for DUers of all people to understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:16 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. Institutional heterosexism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
djg21
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 10:55 AM Response to Reply #15 |
42. A spurious argument! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 11:36 AM Response to Reply #42 |
46. A shameful argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:45 AM Response to Reply #46 |
58. I think you touched on the only possible outcome of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeahMira
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:57 AM Response to Reply #42 |
71. Stand strong for what is RIGHT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foreigncorrespondent
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 11:32 AM Response to Reply #13 |
45. That's right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
39. I'm sure if you polled people in the 1930s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 06:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. I think the argument is more correctly framed about the wording |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 06:43 AM Response to Original message |
3. Excellent post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tobius
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 06:50 AM Response to Original message |
4. exactly right. Either you support the 14th amend. or you don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waverley_Hills_Hiker
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
5. Jim Crow gets married?..& "states rights". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maeve
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:14 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. The "leave it to the states" argument is one of the camel's nose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. "Jim Crow gets married" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waverley_Hills_Hiker
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:11 AM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Sure! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:17 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. No, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waverley_Hills_Hiker
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:26 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
6. Better to crawl befor you walk than never to walk at all. In other words - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spentastic
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:09 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Hmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:05 AM Response to Reply #6 |
18. It took 60 years (after Plessy) and a phalanx of federal troops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:15 AM Response to Reply #6 |
25. I'm not CRAWLING for anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:19 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. "What would your advice have been to Rosa Parks?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
8. Stop it! "They" aren't ready for it yet. Incrementalism is the key. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:11 AM Response to Reply #8 |
21. I've never been one for incrementalism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
11. All right. This is what I posted twice yesterday, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:09 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. I was not responding to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:20 AM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Is this not the time then for the federal government to step in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:36 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Yes, it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solomon
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:52 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Don't mean to rain on your parade, but I find your attempt to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 10:10 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Say what you will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vernunft II
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:53 AM Response to Reply #40 |
51. I wouldn´t be caught dead in a church |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roughsatori
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
12. I'm shocked at how many supporters of Gay Jim Crow Laws we have at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waverley_Hills_Hiker
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:14 AM Response to Reply #12 |
24. ..they are trying to be pragmatic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:22 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waverley_Hills_Hiker
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:32 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. you need to explain that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 10:01 AM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
17. IMHO this issue is going to be driven by civil disobedience and courts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
22. well stated, Martin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terryg11
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
33. Talk to your democratic pres. candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:37 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. To be honest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vernunft II
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
36. Correct me if I´m wrong BUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 10:13 AM Response to Reply #36 |
41. Marriage licenses are issued by the state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
djg21
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 11:26 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Actually, it may be both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 11:42 AM Response to Reply #43 |
47. Form and content |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vernunft II
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 02:50 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. So what´s the fuzz then ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sufi Marmot
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:45 AM Response to Original message |
49. Marriage vs. civil unions: semantics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vernunft II
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:49 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. I´m married and we married in the town house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sufi Marmot
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:07 AM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Exactly, and you can call it whatever you want... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vernunft II
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:11 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. EXACTLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sufi Marmot
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:21 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Works for me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vernunft II
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:25 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Aye, now our fellow posters need to see the light :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:32 AM Response to Reply #54 |
56. If you are proposing to eliminate marriage licenses in favor of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sufi Marmot
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:53 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. I think I understand your distinction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:29 AM Response to Reply #60 |
63. My main concern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vernunft II
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:58 AM Response to Reply #56 |
61. I agree, 2 different documents is a bad idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lexingtonian
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:43 AM Response to Original message |
57. First, let's get onto the bus at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:51 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. So, what you're saying is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lexingtonian
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:04 AM Response to Reply #59 |
62. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSchreader
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:33 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Who's "hijacking the bus"?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lexingtonian
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 06:40 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Of course I agree with you in principles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 06:42 AM Response to Reply #57 |
66. Why would you want to give up at this point? We are closer than you think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:03 AM Response to Reply #57 |
67. Take a look at the statistics/polls in this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MICHAEL_LAPERE
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
68. What the constitution was intended for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 08:13 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeahMira
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
70. Separate religion out of the state's business? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC