Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stephen Hadley: From Iran-Contra to NigerSOTUUraniumYellowCakeGate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 11:54 PM
Original message
Stephen Hadley: From Iran-Contra to NigerSOTUUraniumYellowCakeGate
http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemID=15383

Saving Condy's rear
Stephen Hadley, Rice's top deputy, says he's to blame for Nigergate. Is he?

snip

From his days as a energetic young staff member with the Tower Commission investigating the Iran-Contra Affair, Stephen Hadley knows from scandals. Now, he's is in the middle of one.

On Tuesday, July 22, at a White House off-camera briefing with White House communications director Dan Bartlett at his side, Stephen Hadley, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice's top deputy, took partial responsibility for the unfounded claim in President Bush's State of the Union address that Iraq had gone uranium shopping in Africa. "I should have recalled at the time of the State of the Union speech that there was controversy associated with the uranium issue," said Hadley. The New York Times described Hadley as "a critical behind-the-scenes player in the Bush White House."

snip

Like many other pre-war relatively unknown administration staffers -- Had you ever heard of Douglas Feith, undersecretary of defense for policy, before the Iraq invasion? -- Stephen Hadley played an important supporting role in marketing the invasion of Iraq to the American people. The New York Times reported on November 4, 2002 that Hadley, together with national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, would work closely with the newly established Committee for the Liberation of Iraq. The Committee, with such high-powered members as former secretary of state George P. Shultz, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and former senator Bob Kerrey (D-Neb.), was to be "modeled on a successful lobbying campaign to expand the NATO alliance." From the outset, however, the Committee's goal was clear: the removal of Saddam Hussein from Iraq.


snip

* He also may have written the bulk of the Tower Commission report that exonerated Reagan and Bush in the Iran-Contra scandal.

Headed by Sen. John Tower, Sen. Edmund Muskie, and Brent Scowcroft, the Tower Commission was appointed by President Reagan in December, 1986 to investigate the Iran-Contra Affair, the administration's authorization of the sale of arms to Iran (only a few years after it kidnapped and held American hostages) and the diversion of the profits to illegally fund the Contras (a CIA-sponsored terrorist band) in Nicaragua.

Whether he wrote the bulk of the Tower Commission Report or not, Hadley was an "extremely able and prolific contributor" to the Commission's work, said W. Clark McFadden, General Counsel for the Commission. In a phone interview, McFadden said that Hadley "was a major drafter of the chronologies that were set forth in the report and drafted other parts as well. It was a very small staff and lots of people helped edit the report. He was absolutely excellent, first rate, a gifted writer and enormously conscientious."

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Getting to where you need a program with these characters.
Or a flow chart.

Anybody seen a journalist?

Oh, is that a ranch house they're in, or another kind of house?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
As for "needing a flow chart"-----somebody has posted here that she uses BROCK's book as reference when names re-emerge. BLUMENTHAL's and TOOBIN's et al. are all handy this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think the question at this point should be
what criminals from Watergate and Iran Contra are NOT involved with this administration. Since Ford pardoned Nixon and Clinton refused or whatever to go after bush for Iran Contra the only thing left to worry about was that darn press and voting machines. It took a couple of years but bingo now all those bases are covered. Maybe not though someone must be leaking the 28 pages to the Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, this definitely needs a good, swift
:kick:

Unbelievable.

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bodhisattava Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Omerta code, American style
These guys can go from democratic to Republican administrations without breaking a sweat.They are there to provide silent support
regardless of who is in power.

Silence and a strong inclination to not see, hear or speak are the only qualifications necessary for these jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC