|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
drdigi420
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 07:45 PM Original message |
It is NOT 'changing the definition' of marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastknowngood
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. I don't think we can define marriage as a man and woman until |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jansu
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. What about those who are neither man or woman? Can they marry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissB
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
3. So write a letter to the editor pointing this out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. Of course we are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Actually, marriage is defined several ways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Not in the U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Well God Bless America. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdigi420
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. most fundies do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:32 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I only have problems with propaganda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdigi420
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 08:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. nope, we arent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. No, but it was redefining who was a citizen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 09:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. it is unhelpful to claim that this does not represent a re-definition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 10:30 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Marriage has gone through a lot of changes before and not expired |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdigi420
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 10:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. we are not redefining it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Thu Feb-26-04 10:35 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. It is a redefinition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC