|
I certainly see your point on the first argument (but, really, they were all excellently put). Really, I probably would have been much more supportive of the war if Bush had said, from the beginning, "Look. Saddam is a very bad person who has committed horrible atrocities, and for the good of the Iraqi people, we must remove him." I would probably have questioned the timing a bit, and thought twice about Bush's military contractor ties, but I would have been much more supportive nonetheless. Instead, Bush lied to us, repeatedly. And it looks like he lied because the invasion's cause was malicious/militant. I can't support that. But feel free to express your own 'free flowing' opinion.
I do, agree, though that we shouldn't just cut and run from Iraq (I don't know of anyone who supports doing that). We broke it, we bought it, and we ought to get international support in Iraq to help stabilize it, for the good of both ourselves and the Iraqi people.
|