Question for British DUers
truthspeaker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-27-04 09:07 AM
Original message |
Question for British DUers |
|
Why doesn't the Labour party dump Blair? Is there a way they can force him out as party leader and PM without forcing new parliamentary elections?
|
AmericanErrorist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-27-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
It seems to be in in his mind whether to try to challange Blair in the next leadership race.
I doubt he will be any better, really.
(And no, I'm not British, but I do get both ITV (from Newsworld International) and the BBC (on public TV and BBC America)!)
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-27-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message |
2. They can, but won't until Blair is an obvious liability. |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-27-04 09:37 AM by Screaming Lord Byron
He has won them two landslides after all.
|
truthspeaker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-27-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. from this side of the Atlantic he already seems like a liability |
|
Those two landslide elections were before the Iraq war. He went along with the Iraq war even though most Britains opposed it. Now it turns out Robin Cook was right and he was wrong, but he is still obstinately clinging to his Poodle status.
|
T_i_B
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-27-04 11:40 AM
Original message |
Blair's hold on the party is too strong |
|
Blair has given the party two landslides for one thing and the party has given the leadership a lot of power which means that the party has become little more than a Tony Blair fan club. The leadership of the party brooks NO dissent and the party's MP's are for the most part Blairite androids who would vote for the execution of the first born if Blair told them to.
Why has all this come to pass? After 18 years in opposition the party wanted power at any cost and Blair gave them that. The downside has been that the Labour party has lost its purpose, principles and its soul in the proccess.
|
T_i_B
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-27-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Blair's hold on the party is too strong |
|
Blair has given the party two landslides for one thing and the party has given the leadership a lot of power which means that the party has become little more than a Tony Blair fan club. The leadership of the party brooks NO dissent and the party's MP's are for the most part Blairite androids who would vote for the execution of the first born if Blair told them to.
Why has all this come to pass? After 18 years in opposition the party wanted power at any cost and Blair gave them that. The downside has been that the Labour party has lost its purpose, principles and its soul in the proccess.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.