|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Mattforclark
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:32 AM Original message |
Poll question: Would you vote for an otherwise qualified... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. You don't give other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vagabond
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Perfect response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:38 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Otherwise equal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. There is a big difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:43 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. So all things being equal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Gay, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:48 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. What is an "anti-religion" agenda? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:50 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Well, your post is a prime example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:03 AM Response to Reply #8 |
20. I'm not a politician, so I don't have to pander to superstitious people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:06 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Civil discourse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:13 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. No. I am NOT a politician. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:16 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Clearly, you are not a politician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:25 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. No, I'm not here to win friends or influence people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:31 AM Response to Reply #41 |
44. My faith is not shaken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:42 AM Response to Reply #44 |
48. I didn't call you "religous wacko" as many would do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:54 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. No, words do damage whether you acknowledge it or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:01 AM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Sorry you feel that way. How are you damaged? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:16 AM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Terminology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:22 AM Response to Reply #58 |
61. It's not intended to hurt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:27 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. You, my "friend" are bigoted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:32 AM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Perhaps. I'm chock full of flaws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:16 PM Response to Reply #65 |
77. It is rather easy to use a value neutral word instead of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rexcat
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 08:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
82. Bigotry against atheist is OK but attack someone's religious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atlant
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #8 |
23. So you'd vote for them as long as they weren't too, say, "uppity"? (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:07 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:14 AM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Was it right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:17 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. It wasn't productive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:22 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. But was it expected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:25 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Again, doesn't make it right -- or smart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:30 AM Response to Reply #39 |
43. I'm personally not speaking out of anger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:50 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Assume |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:53 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. As I said above, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Would you also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:54 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:56 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I trust I do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:57 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. It makes me realistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:03 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. I know you are trying to be fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:09 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Courageous? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:21 AM Response to Reply #26 |
37. There are atheists in office right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:28 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. As I have made clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mattforclark
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:33 AM Response to Reply #37 |
45. poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:52 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Do you assume |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mattforclark
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 09:59 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Doesn't seem so unreasonable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:00 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. based on your posts in other threads, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:02 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Ah, the misstatements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:03 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. In this very forum someone started a thread making fun of Gibson's movie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:09 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. They were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:13 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. making fun of a movie about Jesus is not mocking Christianity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:18 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. It's all in how you do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:19 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. and, again, no one mocked Jesus in that thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:22 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. A matter of opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:33 AM Response to Reply #38 |
46. If your opinion is that any discussion at all about Christianity or Jesus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:44 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Anything can be discussed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:55 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. and by insisting on limitations on the discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:57 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Nope, I am demanding the same respect you seek |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:07 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. I respect the beliefs of superstitious folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:22 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. "Lust to the left" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:29 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. OOPS! JUST to the left! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:09 AM Response to Reply #52 |
57. If that were true you wouldn't have objected to that thread title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:35 AM Response to Reply #57 |
66. How so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:51 AM Response to Reply #66 |
69. what could possibly be objectionable about "Jesus Chainsaw Massacre"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 12:16 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Oh I don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthspeaker
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 12:17 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. I don't see how that's offensive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:35 AM Response to Reply #13 |
47. Many preachers publicly call non-believers "sinners" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:59 AM Response to Reply #47 |
53. You GO Gringo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:22 AM Response to Reply #47 |
60. Not every believer is a preacher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mattforclark
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:29 AM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Great post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:37 AM Response to Reply #60 |
67. For Christians to expect their beliefs to be treated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 12:15 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. I rest my case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 12:23 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. You can't make a logical argument, so you cry about being "attacked" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mattforclark
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 12:41 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:36 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. His point had nothing to do with the legitimacy of his religion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 12:25 PM Response to Reply #67 |
74. And what did you win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gringo
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 01:06 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Still - The very PREMISE of this poll is insulting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smirkymonkey
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
79. But you would vote for a religious person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mattforclark
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
28. I added "other" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 10:12 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damnyankee2601
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
55. Only if they could beat Bush nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kamika
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
68. Id vote for a gay atheistic monkey instead of Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
distortionmarshall
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
80. um, duh? /eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
81. i would perfer an antheist. all his chips are betting on this world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC