Considerable time and energy has been spent speculating on the reliability, reputation, and motivations of the accuser. Let's take a look at the other side of this story - the possibility that the accuser is telling the truth, and that Kobe Bryant might be the one lying.
Sources: Kobe forced sex on womansnip
ABC NEWS AND the Vail Daily, citing anonymous sources, reported that Bryant and the woman had some consensual sexual contact but that she did not agree to have intercourse with him.
The network also said the woman, a concierge at the Lodge & Spa at Cordillera, was in Bryant’s room for less than a half hour. Both ABC and the Vail paper reported that Bryant gave inconsistent statements to Eagle County authorities.
<snip>
ABC and the Vail paper said Bryant’s unidentified accuser had given Bryant a tour of the hotel when he arrived June 30 and that he
later called and asked her to come to his room.The Rocky Mountain News reported Thursday that law enforcement sources close to the investigation said that the woman suffered physical trauma in the vaginal area.
<snip>
When he filed charges July 18, prosecutor Mark Hurlbert said he had both physical and testimonial evidence to prove the case. He said Bryant forced the victim into “submission” through physical force but refused to disclose other details.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/945921.aspMSNBC reported several times in the last couple days that Kobe originally lied to the police and said he didn't know the accuser and had never met her. Then when DNA evidence proved he had sex with her, he admitted to knowing her and having sex, but that it was consensual.
In addition, there were several reports on MSNBC that there was consensual sexual contact, but that she refused to have intercourse, and then she "was not allowed to leave the room." That might explain the disturbance overheard by witnesses outside his room when this encounter took place.
It seems to me that the only proof of lying so far has been by Kobe Bryant. He lied to the police about his involvement with her and changed his story when DNA evidence forced him to admit he had sex with her.
I don't think there is any call to be trashing the accuser. From what little facts available so far, they seem to be pointing to her telling the truth.
Linda