Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Haiti is all about privatization and the CHEAPEST labor possible

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 11:52 AM
Original message
Haiti is all about privatization and the CHEAPEST labor possible
Latin America owes more than one-third of its total economic output in a year to other countries and banks.!!!!!

In Haiti "the IMF and World Bank blocked the government from raising the minimum wage and then demanded the privatization of profitable public companies which generated revenue for desperately needed services. The IMF insisted that Haiti should cut government services by half, in spite of a national shortage of teachers and health care workers, a life expectancy of 49 years for men and 53 years for women, 45% literacy and infant mortality running at nearly 10%."
--Trim Bissell and Robert Weissman, ed. False Profits: Who Wins, Who Loses When the IMF, World Bank and WTO Come to Town?, (Campaign for Labor Rights: US: Feb. 2000), p.2


http://216.239.41.104/search?q=cache:0jL7XgukJCsJ:www.socialistalternative.org/literature/imfwb/introduction.html+haiti+IMF+World+Bank+cheap+labor&hl=en&start=5&ie=UTF-8

privatization.....cheapest labor this side of the globe; Haiti's only resource, leading the race to the bottom......coming soon (as possible to YOUR neighborhood.....a labor destabilization lab in our front yard)

Aristide doubled the minimum wage.....a major motive force behind his ouster...that's what got the ball rolling behind the IMFers, privatizers, and cheap labor employers who are pulling the strings

"Government approves sell-off of nine state-run companies"
"the long-awaited and internationally supported democracy could fail in the absence of the consolidation of economic structures,” declared Haitian President, René Preval, at a recent international conference. A key to his economic reform lies in privatizing - or as Haitian government prefers to call it, modernizing - inefficient state industries. Investors will not be able to buy outright the nine enterprises that will be offered for investment. The government prefers joint ventures, management contracts and concession. Mr. Preval expects to convert Haiti into “an enormous construction site.”
"René Preval: Haiti will become an enormous construction site"

http://www.unitedworld-usa.com/reports/haiti/privatization.asp

the above is either a satire, or a PRO-privatization site

here are some more:

http://madre.org/country_haiti_crisis.html
good overall background info on what's happening, and WHY we're not getting anything close to the real story...media coverage there is even worse than that from Venezeula

http://multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/mm1195.03.html
Haiti Bucks privatization:

A RISING WAVE OF Haitian protests culminated in mid-October 1995 with the resignation of Prime Minister Smarck Michel, a key promoter of neo-liberal structural adjustment policies. Michel's exit leaves the future of these policies -- and the international aid conditioned upon them -- in question. A year after President Jean-Bertrand Aristide returned to power, Foreign Minister Claudette Werleigh, a product of Haiti's democratic movement, replaced Michel -- a member of Haiti's tiny business elite.

Michel resigned after late September 1995 elections that swept in populist candidates who raised major obstacles to Michel's economic program, especially plans to privatize state-owned enterprises. The setback to structural adjustment plans in Haiti became evident by early October 1995, when the World Bank held its annual meeting in Washington, D.C. The Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) tried to get Haiti to sign a letter of intent that conditioned $100 million in financing on Haiti meeting structural adjustment targets.

The Bank hoped to use the letter at its annual meeting to show Haitian support for its policies. Showing the influence of the new Parliament, Haiti refused to sign.

In an October 15 visit to Port-au-Prince, a visibly angry U.S. Vice President Al Gore unsuccessfully endeavored to salvage Michel's role -- or at least his neo-liberal legacy -- through what Gore called "an intense one-on-one" with Aristide.



http://www.oz.net/~vvawai/sw/sw33/pgs_10-19/anti-private.html
The U.S. military occupation of Haiti did not come to protect the human rights of the Haitian masses, as trumpeted by the Pentagon and Clinton administration, but rather to protect the interests and property of privileged Haitians who backed the 1991 coup. This was the message of Captain Lawrence Rockwood during a series of appearances in the New York City area last week. The Haiti Support Network (HSN), a coalition of groups and individuals dedicated to raising political and material support for the National Popular Assembly (APN), sponsored two events featuring Captain Rockwood as well as Barbara Briggs and Charles Kernaghan of the National Labor Committee (NLC) and Ben Dupuy of Haiti Progres.

Captain Rockwood is the U.S. Army counterintelligence officer court-martialed in May 1995 for trying to make an unauthorized inspection of the National Penitentiary in Port-au-Prince on Sept. 30, 1994 after formally charging his superiors with "criminal negligence" for refusing to act to protect the lives and well-being of Haitian political prisoners. "We knew in September <1994> that, for 80% of those prisoners , their only crime was being pro-Aristide," Rockwood said at the May 2 event in Manhattan, noting that the prisoners were living in 6 inches of their own feces. "But it took 90 days to go into the National Penitentiary on Dec. 18, 1994 for an accountability," which means to occupy the prison and review what prisoners are being held and why. During the invasions of Panama in 1990 and Grenada in 1983, Rockwood pointed out, the prisons were occupied on the very first day. The priority for the U.S. military in Haiti, Rockwood explained, was "force protection," that is, protecting themselves, as well as protection of the coup-backing bourgeoisie.


the force protection mission, mentioned in the last sentence, was just confirmed by none other than ABC's George Will this morning, who said his son, a Marine stationed in Haiti, said that we were there for exactly that reason, omitting, of course the second part (about protecting the coup-backers)

http://www.american.edu/carmel/gs9261a/Liberalization.htm
The Government of Haiti is committed to privatizing the management of a large number of state owned enterprises. Haiti's nine principal businesses: the flour mill, cement factory, telephone company (TELECO), electric company (EDH), port authority, airport authority, edible oil plant and two commercial banks are slated for privatization under the terms of the law on the modernization of public enterprises. The government established the CMEP (Commission for the Modernization of Public Enterprizes) in January 1997. The CMEP is made up five members to oversee the privatization program. In February 1997 the CMEP announced a time-bound action plan to guide the privatization process. The flour mill and cement plant were privatized in 1999.



this is an old story, dating back to the L'Ouverture revolution, delineated by Smedley Butler some seventy years ago, and revisited constantly since.

It's all about the money/power/labor nexus. Watch what happens in the Caribbean, Central/South American labor markets. See what it portends for US labor in the not-too distant future.

apologies if this stuff is old news (haven't seen it discussed ANYwhere else, in print or other media).....I haven't read any threads here on Haiti, stumbling on the Madre.org site after hearing Yitaf Susskind on http://www.thisishell.com yesterday, discussing the subject.

quite a show, BTW, with Scott Ritter, Danny Schecter and Daniel Ellsberg as guests

last week they had on Greg Palast and Noam Chomsky.....last August, Karen Kwiatkowski, before she became a "household" (at DU) name

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. You got it!!
Edited on Sun Feb-29-04 12:01 PM by mac2
Your World Uion at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah.....been igoring Haiti, thinking it didn't have relevance,
so why bother

it's quite the microcosm for just about everything, though:

total media control:

Most international coverage of the crisis in Haiti comes from the large wire services, Reuters and the Associated Press. These wire services rely almost exclusively on Haiti’s elite-owned media (Radio Metropole, Tele-Haiti, Radio Caraibe, Radio Vision 2000 and Radio Kiskeya) for their stories. The outlets are owned and operated by the opposition. For example, Andy Apaid, spokesman for the Group of 184, is the founder of Tele-Haiti.

privatization of infrastructure.....see header, which lists the nine principal state businesses slated for privatization. you KNOW that's what the aim is, clearly stated all over the world (not just third world.....see Palast/Blair/England for starters)

cheapest labor possible........getting more and more obviuos here every day, isn't it (can you say outsourcing?)

I could go on, but this is getting very depressing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. have seen zero mention of the privatization/economic aspect in news
anybody else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Right on and I wonder what people think ,if they do, about this.
Just what do they think will happen in a country like ours and Canada to be lands of plenty with a sea of starving people that sit off our lands watching us.What wall is going to keep these people out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. thanks for these links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. yr wlcm
really bumming me badly.....this is our future, staring at us in the face, along with that thread here on the Alaskan climatological disaster, foretelling what the future holds for us on that front.

meanwhile, idiot Scott McClellan vomits forth the conventional wisdom that Aristide brought it on himself........

yeah, I guess he DID, by trying to give his citizens a semi-demi-sesquaver of a living wage, in the face of a six hundred fifty BILLION withholding of funds by the IMF.

he never had a chance.

and the Clinton admin is no less guilty than Bush on this front
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. David Dreyer and the egregious Diane Feinstein are blathering about
this with Wolf right now, completely missing the point, IGNORING utterly WHY the "culture of rebellion" (or something she spewed out, fecklessly describing the political landscape there) has arisen there.

well HERE's what's going on there:

"....according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, nearly half of all Haitians lack access to even minimum food requirements. Hospitals, schools, police stations and other government buildings have been burned and looted."
http://madre.org/country_haiti_crisis.html

god knows what's going on even as we luxuriate here in our first world (for the moment) warm/cool electronic comfort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. smedley butler, telling it like it was, is, and will be:
I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914.

I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National city Bank boys to collect revenues in.

I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. (1940)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler

I know this is such boring stuff, competing with the likes of mel and such, but just remember, a few years down the road, when you're paying Halliburton a thousand dollars a week for your drinking water.....I know......zzzzzzzzzzz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. from the above quote......
did he say Brown Brothers, as in Brown, Brothers, Harriman?

never mind.....who cares
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Some Statistics on Haiti (from your link) Thanks
Some Statistics on Haiti

· The richest 1% of the population controls nearly half of all of Haiti’s wealth.
· Haiti has long ranked as the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere and is the fourth poorest country in the world.
· Haiti ranks 146 out of 173 on the Human Development Index.*
· Life expectancy is 52 years for women and 48 for men*.
· Adult literacy is about 50%.*
· Unemployment is about 70%.*
· 85% of Haitians live on less than $1 US per day.*
· Haiti ranks 38 out of 195 for under-five mortality rate.*

*Source: “Investigating the Effects of Withheld Humanitarian Aid,” a report of the Haiti Reborn/Quixote Center.

http://madre.org/country_haiti_crisis.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. hey! Aristide brought it all on himself!
don't you read the WH press releases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I am listening to that IDIOT babbling about "a new chapter in Haitian
history".

It is a good thing my pistol is out of reach because I, for the first time ever, wanted to shoot the TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Peasants' lives ruined by capitalist pigs
Edited on Sun Feb-29-04 01:08 PM by Tinoire
It may sound a little funny but this, to me, is the saddest, most cruel thing that was ever done to the Haitian peasant. When their pigs were cruelly, deliberately slaughtered, they knew what slavery awaited them in factories because they had no other way to live. They were machiavellically shifted from independent peasants to enslaved penny-earning factory workers. People wept and cried for a long time, literally screamed and fought as their pigs were slaughtered. Note how Aristide tried to return their pigs so they would have some form of independence again...

Thanks for all your information.


Peasants' lives ruined by capitalist pigs
By George Monbiot, The Guardian, 2 April 1996

AFRICAN swine fever came to Dominica by way of a ham sandwich on a Spanish airliner. It soon spread down the Artibonite River and over the border into Haiti. The epidemic swiftly killed one-third of that country's pigs. but, by late 1981, it seemed to be fizzling out. The US was taking no chances, however. It funded a programme to slaughter every pig in Haiti.

To the peasants producing most of Haiti's food, the programme was devastating. Their small black pigs, which largely fended for themselves, were so critical to their economy that the same word was used for pig and for bank. People hid their pigs in holes and caves, but President Duvalier's dreaded Tontons Macoutes rooted the animals out and had them shot. Even quarantined herds were exterminated.

The US Agency for International Development (USAID) argued that the slaughter should be seen as less of a problem than an opportunity. By replacing the small black pigs with large white ones from the US, Haiti could become a pork exporter, and a lucky new participant in the modern agricultural economy. The new pigs grew fast, but needed as much pampering as the Duvaliers. While the peasants lived in bamboo shacks and ate only the food they grew for themselves. the white pigs needed concrete houses, showers and imported food and medicine. Pig-breeding became the preserve of big business, leaving the peasants with nothing. It is no exaggeration to say that the demise of the creole pig sped the demise of Baby Doc.

President Aristide's new government began to import black pigs from other islands and distribute them to the peasants. As a result, when Aristide was overthrown the new military leaders declared that the black pigs were communist pigs, whose owners should be rounded up as subversives. The white pigs, by contrast, were capitalist pigs, and a source of national pride. By the time Aristide returned, in 1994, the peasant economy had been strangled, and much of the peasants' land had been bought up by companies growing coffee or flowers for export to America.

<snip>

In Haiti, USAID's objective was a shift of 30 per cent of all cultivated land from the production of food to the production of export crops. At first this was impossible, as the peasant economy was too strong. After the pig- stickings it became achievable. While the world's most powerful pigs have their snouts in the trough. only self- reliance will deliver food security.


http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/43a/317.html

============

OAS Foundation Riles Haitian Peasants
from This Week in Haiti

Ask almost any peasant in Haiti, and he or she will tell you that the "American plan" for Haiti began in 1982. That was the year that the US Agency for International Development (USAID) in collaboration with dictator Jean-Claude Duvalier launched a program called PEPPADEP, which stood for the "Project for Eradication of the African Swine Fever and the Development of Pig Raising."

Under this highfalutin title, Haitian and US authorities proceeded with the mass extermination of Haiti's famous "kochon kreyol" or Creole pigs, the hardy, black-haired swine which were for generations the back-bone of the peasant economy.

Once the indigenous pigs were wiped out, the US sold to the few Haitian peasants who could afford them "kochon grimel" or white pigs, a large fatty American breed which fared poorly under the rigorous conditions of the Haitian countryside.

Peasants around the northern town of Plaisance fear that they may be witnessing today a new attack on another mainstay of their economy: yams. On June 15, peasants took to the airwaves of the local community radio station, "Zeb Ginen," to say that the representatives from the Pan American Development Foundation (PADF) were buying up all the yams in the region, particularly in the remote mountain areas of Martineau and Champagne, where peasants live off the root year-round. Was the yam purchasing campaign another PEPPADEP, they asked.


<snip>

http://www.ibiblio.org/prism/sep98/foundation.html

=====

<snip>

The story continued after the government was handed over to Haitian overseers. In 1941, the Haitian-American Company for Agricultural Development (SHADA) was set up as an aid project under the guidance of US agronomists, who dismissed the advice and protests of Haitian experts with the usual contempt. With millions of dollars of US government credits, SHADA undertook to raise sisal and rubber, needed at the time for war purposes. The project acquired 5 percent of Haiti's finest agricultural lands, expelling 40,000 peasant families, who, if lucky, might be rehired as day laborers. After four years of production, the project harvested a laughable five tons of rubber. It was then abandoned, in part because the market was gone. Some peasants returned to their former lands, but were unable to resume cultivation because the land had been ruined by the SHADA project. Many could not even find their own fields after trees, hills and bushes had been bulldozed away.

<snip>

In 1978, US experts became concerned that swine fever in the Dominican Republic might threaten the US pig industry. The US initiated a $23 million extermination and restocking program aimed at replacing all of the 1.3 million pigs in Haiti, which were among the peasants' most important possessions, even considered a "bank account" in case of need. Though some Haitian pigs had been found to be infected, few had died, possibly because of their remarkable disease-resistance, some veterinary experts felt. Peasants were skeptical, speculating that the affair had been staged so that "Americans could make money selling their pigs." The program was initiated in 1982, well after traces of disease had disappeared. Two years later, there were no pigs in Haiti.

Peasants regarded this as "the very last thing left in the possible punishments that have afflicted us." A Haitian economist described the enterprise as "the worst calamity to ever befall the peasant," even apart from the $600 million value of the destroyed livestock: "The real loss to the peasant is incalculable... is reeling from the impact of being without pigs. A whole way of life has been destroyed in this survival economy." School registration dropped 40-50 percent and sales of merchandise plummeted, as the marginal economy collapsed. A USAID-OAS program then sent pigs from Iowa -- for many peasants, confirming their suspicions. These were, however, to be made available only to peasants who could show that they had the capital necessary to feed the new arrivals and to house them according to specifications. Unlike the native Haitian pigs, the Iowa replacements often succumbed to disease, and could survive only on expensive feed, at a cost that ran up to $250 a year, a huge sum for impoverished peasants. One predictable result was new fortunes for the Duvalier clique and their successors who gained control of the feed market. A Church-based Haitian development program that had sought to deal with the problems abandoned the effort as "a waste of time." "These pigs will never become acclimated to Haiti... Next they'll ask us to install a generator and air conditioning."3

<snip>

http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/year/year-c09-s01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. gack.....thought I was depressed before going through the above
thanks, Tinoire, I guess....really really sad

and that illiterate MONSTER just spoke about sending in the marines!

Where's your Smedley Butler, NOW?

he urges "the people of Haiti to reject violence"!!!!!!!!

words fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. That "thing" leaves me speechless too.
My only consolation is that he will ROT in hell. It can't happen soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bush just announced Aristede has been overthrown!
live on TV right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. hmmmmmmm.........Otto Reich ring a bell?
Several grassroots political activists from Haiti's Lavalas movement recently sat in a small room watching television on the first day of the Bush administration's war against Iraq. For about half an hour they shifted between Canada's RDI and France's RFI Caribbean broadcasts in French. The room suddenly broke into excited chatter as images of thousands upon thousands of housewives, union activists and students demonstrating against the war with Iraq filled the screen. The protestors heralded from such far away cities as Berlin, Bern, Karachi, Madrid, Milan, San Francisco and Washington.

Jasmine, a 36 year-old women's organizer and local Lavalas representative, turned to me and asked everyone if we could change the channel to CNN and would I provide a rough translation in English. We sat in "shock and awe" for nearly an hour as "military expert" after "military expert" provided sanitized explanations of U.S. military strategy and the effects of several types of missiles raining hellfire down upon Baghdad's population. The commentary of these "experts" was broken only by official White House briefings, replays of the bombs falling, and interviews with journalists "embedded" with the advancing military troops soon to be unleashed on the orders of President Bush.

About forty-five minutes into the broadcast, a small message update scrolled across the bottom of the screen announcing protests had begun in San Francisco and Washington. I translated it as another well-known neighborhood activist asked, "Why aren't they showing any of the images of the international protests against the war we saw on the French language stations? It is almost as if they don't exist for the U.S.!" The room grew more excited as he punctuated this last comment with, "It reminds me of what the U.S. press did to us last November 25!" The consensus in the room was that there was something dreadfully wrong with the way CNN was lionizing official U.S. policy while almost completely ignoring the protests against the war. The assembled Haitian activists drew a parallel between this and U.S. media coverage of a peaceful demonstration by tens of thousands of Lavalas supporters in Haiti last November 25th. They felt their demonstrations were ignored by the U.S. press in a similar way while much smaller rallies demanding the resignation of President Aristide, a position many here view as official U.S. policy, were given unqualified weight and measure.

I couldn't help but think there might be something to this comparison as I remembered that Ambassador Otto Reich, President Bush's Envoy for Western Hemisphere Initiatives, had arrived in Haiti the same week bombs began falling on Iraq. Reich came as part of a delegation representing the Organization of American States and the Caribbean Community Council with the intention of brokering an agreement between the Haitian government and the Washington-backed "opposition" to Lavalas. Otto Reich is a known quantity when it comes to controlling the press and manipulating events to achieve U.S. foreign policy objectives in Latin America and the Caribbean.


http://www.blackcommentator.com/36/36_guest_commentator.html

sound familiar?

media will never let us know what's really happening there

now for some NED stuff, if I'm not missing my guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. more sick making stuff, from the water over the Tigris dam department
.....the State Department is subtlety supporting the opposition’s attempts to undemocratically oust President Aristide in a scenario of “regime change” that must by now be quite familiar to Secretary of State Colin Powell. The reasons for Washington’s openly anti-Aristide policy are not hard to discern.

U.S. foreign policy towards Latin America remains in the hands of a small group of hardline policymakers led by Assistant Secretary of State Roger Noriega and Special Presidential Envoy Otto Reich, the ideological heirs to former Senator Jesse Helms, who is said to have never met a right-wing Latin American dictator he didn’t like.

Conversely, he also had little affection for democratically-elected presidents, among which was his nemesis Aristide, who he considered to be the next Castro of the Caribbean. These Washington extremists have had no interest in ensuring that Aristide serves out his constitutionally mandated tenure; on the contrary, they are no doubt eager to see him go, and hence quite content to let the opposition continue to wreak havoc without meddlesome interference from the Washington other than a stream of pro-forma statements about how troubled the White House is by the violence in Haiti, but unaccompanied by desperately needed anti-riot equipment shipments to Port-Au-Prince.

Needless to say, the State Department has a litany of anti-Aristide criticisms they are happy to cite to reporters off-the-record in order to justify their tacit endorsement of the overthrow of President Aristide. The most common is the old but still resilient accusation regarding the supposedly rigged 2000 elections and the Aristide government’s failure to comply with the provisions of Resolution 822 of the Organization of American States, which was passed in 2000, to provide a framework for the reestablishment of “political normalcy” in Haiti.

First of all, any suggestion that the so-called Haitian “electoral crisis” still continues is pure rubbish, given that the eight senators whose legitimacy was being questioned at the time have all since left the Senate and Aristide repeatedly has since eagerly called for new elections. Washington is also well aware that the Aristide government’s failure to hold new legislative elections, especially given that the terms of a third of the parliament expired last month, has left Haiti without any legal legislative body because the opposition refuses to accept its designated seats on the Provisional Elections Council, which is an essential first step for any balloting to occur. These events effectively have forced the president to rule by decree.

The State Department persistently neglects to mention that this is the only obstacle to the prompt holding of elections in Haiti, at the same time that it has never vigorously condemned the opposition’s persistent refusal to participate in the electoral council that is required to supervise the elections. Nor has the State Department condemned the opposition’s open rejection of the entire concept of elections and a democratic transfer of power.

The opposition’s justification for this intransigence, insofar as it provides one, is the lack of security in Haiti, another common complaint of the Bush administration. It is to be wondered, however, what type of security the Aristide government is expected to provide as it struggles to maintain a 4000-member national police force to afford protection to 8 million Haitians as part of a total Haitian federal budget of less than $300 million dollars a year. Meanwhile, the N.Y.C. Police Department has almost 62,000 officers to provide comparable service to approximately the same number of people. This is especially the case, since the Aristide government has received no direct bilateral aid from the United States since 2000. The Aristide government is widely accused of failing to professionalize and de-politicize the police force; however, it was the United States and Canada which cut off the aid that they were providing, following Aristide’s return to Haiti in 1994, for police training and professionalization, and they were the countries who originally trained the often criticized police and set up the courts after the military was overthrown.

Condemnations of the Aristide government for its lack of commitment to democratic procedures and its failure to establish a much-desired climate of domestic security verges on hypocrisy on Washington’s part, which has sought virtually at every turn to cripple the ability of the government to govern effectively, and consistently has systematically supported the opposition in its unceasing efforts to sabotage democracy in Haiti.


http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Feb04/Leight0212.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. The NED has been involved up to its neck.
I was following them a few weeks ago because there were too many strange communiques about Aristide and Haiti stealthily popping up.

Wanna weep some more?

Miami Protesters Demand Aristide Step Down
As Many As 300 Rally In Protest

<snip>

In Miami's Bayfront Park on Saturday, about 200 to 300 people rallied in protest -- far short of the 80,000 organizers had predicted would attend.

The protest was a coalition of Haitian, Venezuelan and Cuban groups that also demanded the ouster of Fidel Castro and President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela.

http://www.nbc17.com/news/2865437/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. HAITI: How Washington set the stage for uprising
HAITI: How Washington set the stage for uprising

Lee Sustar

The media have a standard story line to explain the uprising in Haiti — one-time populist leader Jean-Bertrand Aristide has become a corrupt authoritarian who is relying on armed gangs to crush a popular uprising. In reality, the anti-Aristide opposition that is behind the uprising shaking Haiti today is a Washington-connected collection of Haitian businessmen and a scattering of former leftists.

If they succeed in ousting Aristide, they’ll try to turn back the clock to the days when military officers and paramilitary gangs ruled Haiti through sheer terror. Any doubts as to the nature of the rebellion in the city of Gonaieves, which was siezed by rebel gangs on February 5, should be put to rest by the role played by leaders of the military dictatorship of the 1980s.

While the media has described the rebellion as led by former Aristide supporters, a key player is Jean “Tatoune” Pierre, who backed the 1991 coup that overthrew Aristide. Others involved include members of the Front for the Advancement and Progress of Haiti (FRAPH), a paramilitary organization that terrorised and assassinated Aristide supporters during the military regime that lasted until US troops restored Aristide into office in 1994.

<snip>

The top FRAPH leader, Emmanuel Constant, who claims he was a CIA employee, remains at large in New York City. Major funding for Haiti’s umbrella opposition group, Democratic Convergence, comes from the National Endowment for Democracy, a US foundation notorious for funnelling US aid to counterrevolutionary forces in Central America during the Cold War.

While the Haitian opposition’s high-sounding democratic rhetoric is repeated by Western reporters, their right-wing supporters have carried out a systematic campaign of violence against Haitian journalists and pro-Aristide activists. If Aristide’s supporters are armed, it’s because they face armed opponents.

<snip>

http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2004/572/572p17.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. U.S. 'Playing Games' With Haiti, Say Policy Critics
U.S. 'Playing Games' With Haiti, Say Policy Critics
By Bill Alexander, BET.com Staff Writer

Posted February 20, 2004 -- As Americans are urged to leave a Haiti bordering on civil war, a cadre of diplomats from the United States and other countries will soon descend to engage President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in a game of push-and-pull, stay-and-go.

"The United States is playing games with Haiti," claims native-born Haitian Robert Fatton Jr., chairman of the Government and Foreign Affairs department at the University of Virginia.

"Politically connected groups within the country are openly funding Aristide's overthrow (he named the DC-based National Endowment for Democracy) while the Bush administration is saying publicly that Aristide should finish his elected term (which ends February 2006)," says Fatton.

Fatton says the Colin Powell State Department is engaged in a hot "ideological war" over Haiti. Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) shares Fatton's view and singles out Assistant Secretary of State Roger Noriega ("a Jesse Helms political appointee," she notes) as the architect of the "right-wing garbage" that Haiti is a pro-Communist influence in the Western Hemisphere.

"There are 500 Cuban doctors in Haiti," acknowledges Fatton, and relations between the neighboring countries are "quite good" because of mutual survival interests. But, says Fatton, the notion that Aristide is a "mad populist" about to lunge into communism is crazed.

<snip>

http://www.bet.com/articles/0,,c1gb8839-9697,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. yeah on those Helms thugs.....ever seen/heard Larry Birns?
he's one of the few voices of reasons re: Latin American affairs

spoke out strongly against contras a long time ago...first time I'd heard of him was WRT ElSalvador/US aid to terror regime there

Secretary Powell and his controversial Latin American aide, Roger Noriega, have at best used delphic prose in responding to Haitian issues. Rather than demanding that the opposition immediately choose its representatives to the Provisional Electoral Council and end its cat-and-mouse game aimed at sabotaging any prospect of parliamentary elections (which the opposition almost certainly would lose), Washington is unable to hide its pro-opposition bias, even though it cannot be seen as backing the overthrow of a democratically-elected president.

Given the rebels' ideological and financial ties to the U.S. -- they are generously funded by U.S. taxpayers through the International Republican Institute -- Washington's open denouncement of their obstructionism could have an electrifying positive effect. Yet, this has not been forthcoming, partly because U.S. hemispheric policy is guided by a small group of extremists with strong ideological ties to former Senator Jesse Helms, who simplistically see Aristide as the Caribbean's next Castro.


http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Feb04/Birns-Leight02-12-1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. http://www.coha.org/
council on hemispheric affairs, larry birns' baby, on haiti

http://www.coha.org/NEW_PRESS_RELEASES/New_Press_Releases_2004/04.12_Haiti_Op-ed_ThisDay.htm

Over the past two hundred years, Haiti has been no stranger to political violence, coups and the perversion of democracy. This was a sad betrayal of its proud heritage as the world’s first black republic and the Western Hemisphere’s second oldest independent nation, having won its freedom in 1804 after a nine-year uprising by the island’s slaves against their French colonial masters. However, this initial revolutionary triumph gave way almost immediately to the harsh realities of grinding poverty and a dreary succession of repressive governments that came to office by coups rather than honest elections. This dreary legacy culminated in the brutal father-and-son dictatorships of Francois and Jean-Claude Duvalier, who enjoyed Washington’s enthusiastic blessings throughout most of their brutal tenure.

Haiti experienced its first lingering taste of authentic democracy only fourteen years ago, when the populist priest Jean-Bertrand Aristide was elected president in 1990 by two-thirds of all votes cast. Ousted by a military coup only nine months after his inauguration, he was restored via a U.S.-led military intervention in 1994, to serve the final year of his original five-year term. In November 2000, Aristide was reelected president, though the balloting was boycotted by the main Haitian opposition coalition, the Democratic Convergence, which contended that there was no possibility for a fair election because of the supposed fraud in the senate elections held earlier that year.

In fact, those elections were widely acknowledged at the time to be generally free and fair; the only dispute focused on the status of seven senators, some of whom should have been required to go to a runoff round, even though almost all of them had achieved strong pluralities. This relatively minor imperfection has been blown out of proportion and repeatedly brandished by the ironically-labeled “democratic opposition” in Haiti—both the Democratic Convergence and the subsequently formed Group of 184—as evidence of the illegitimacy of the Aristide government. In fact, the opposition was elected by no one and the offending senators all have long since resigned, at the president’s urging. Aristide repeatedly has offered new elections, which the opposition persistently has refused, preferring instead to stage provocative protests in the capital, Port-au-Prince. Even after the terms of one third of the lower house of Haiti’s parliament expired in January of this year, rendering the legislative body without a quorum and stalling all legitimate political processes – forcing Aristide to rule by decree – the opposition continues to refuse to nominate representatives to the provisional electoral council, an essential prerequisite for the holding of new elections, according to Resolution 822 of the Organization of American States, passed in 2000.

The reasons for the opposition’s persistent political obstructionism have long been well-known to the vast majority of Haitians, and in recent months opposition leaders have openly acknowledged their strategy: they have no agenda whatsoever other than the ousting of President Aristide, who they regard as a suspect because of his demobilization of the Haitian army, long the tool of repression sanctioned by the Haitian elite that is the backbone of his Port-au-Prince based opposition, as well as due to his clear identification with the cause of the Haitian poor. Democratic Convergence and Group of 184 are not political parties with a platform of demands over which they are willing to negotiate and compromise; rather, they are vehicles for achieving the ambitions of a small group of leaders, mainly drawn from Haiti’s tiny economic elite, who hope to gain through a violent power grab what they will never have or are likely to win through elections. Accordingly, prominent opposition leaders including Evans Paul, Gerard Pierre-Charles and Victor Benoit have openly stated their preference for a violent revolt or uprooting (dechoukaj) of the current government rather than elections.


but this is all so 2/28 now, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. NED
The chill deepened in 2000, when the United States froze $500 million in desperately needed aid to Haiti because of parliamentary election results that international observers viewed as flawed. ((Cause Aristide won again huh?)) U.S. officials have demanded that Aristide reach an agreement with the opposition for new elections, but the opposition parties, which have received hundreds of thousands of dollars from U.S. agencies such as the National Endowment for Democracy -- a huge amount in dirt-poor Haiti -- have refused to negotiate.

The result, said Alex Dupuy, a sociology professor at Wesleyan University in Middletown, Conn., who closely follows Haiti, is that the opposition to Aristide now has "a virtual veto power over U.S. aid, with no incentive to negotiate with the president. This has pushed Haiti closer to the brink of full-fledged civil war. The risks of huge bloodshed are very high."

But by nearly all accounts, Aristide has made matters worse, and his government has been remarkably corrupt and incompetent. He disbanded the army in 1996, leaving the 4,000-man national police as the government's only armed institution -- and, as the desertions showed Wednesday, it may be almost totally ineffectual. Amid this security vacuum, Aristide has relied on street gangs, named chimeres, which have terrorized the political opposition.

On Wednesday, the opposition coalition, the Group of 184, ruled out any negotiations with Aristide and insisted that he resign -- an all-or-nothing stance that increases the likelihood of a widespread fight between pro- Aristide chimeres and the FRAPH-led rebels.

The Bush administration has sent mixed messages, with hard-liners such as the State Department's Western Hemisphere envoy, Otto Reich, and the ambassador to the Organization of American States, Roger Noriega, suggesting that Aristide step down. But on Tuesday, Secretary of State Colin Powell defended Aristide, saying, "He is right now the free and fairly elected president of Haiti."

<snip>
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/02/19/MNGER53ODF1.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I heard on thisishell yesterday that it was over 650 Mil,,,,peanuts
when we're talking 87 BILLION, but when one makes, what, thirty cents an hour, that kind of money adds up, doesn't it?

listen to yasif susskind in the next few days at
http://www.thisishell.org, when they link her interview in their archives.

as I said, GREAT interviews with Palast, Danny Schecter, and an amazing one with Daniel Ellsberg, in which he calls Fog of War a joke, basically, cause he says McNamara's just rationalizing his support for the war all throughout, even though he appears to be taking some responso.

Ellsberg might still be in jail today, had it not been for those idiot plumbers (course there are those, Liddy among them) who think the whole deal was a setup to get rid of Nixon in the first place

taking TF hat off now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. from the "had more than enough for on day" department
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1178168

in which details of the absolutely pathetic wage increase fiasco is discussed

Last April, the Haitian government raised the national minimum wage from 36 gourdes a day ($2.40 when it was passed in 1994) to 70 gourdes per day (about $1.70 today). But even this paltry sum, lower than the cost of living for the frugal, is often overlooked even by the government itself.

"At the same time that President Aristide was campaigning for increased wages, he was ousted..."he was committed to raising the minimum wage to 72 gourdes" in 1994, "but after lengthy dialogue with the labor unions, domestic and foreign employers," etc., "the bill that finally went before Parliament raised the wage to 36 gourdes a day," from 15. The explanation continued...The president wanted to raise it to 72 gourdes this year, but was pressured to settle at 70 gourdes.

Even Marie-Claude Baillard, the president of the Association of Haitian Industries, acknowledges that the current minimum wage is too low, "in a sense, in terms of the cost of living." But "at the level of the enterprises, there is ferocious competition and the salaries must be competitive," she added. "It's not the most desirable situation," she said, but insisted that the salaries must be kept low in order to create more jobs in Haiti.


thx, tinoire

again, words fail

time for some medication
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. NED's been discussed before prominently WRT Venezuela
but it's an old story, intertwined with the Office of Public Diplomacy

you'll note that this story is six years old

gee....who was president then?

Much like its covert cousin, the CIA, the very visible
NED sees its mission as "planning, coordinating and implementing
international political activities in support of U.S. policies
and interests relative to national security," according to the
1985 NED annual report.

To carry out that mandate in Haiti, the NED -- or more
specifically, its Republican tentacle known as the International
Republican Institute (IRI) -- has worked diligently over recent
months to assemble the Haitian Conference of Political Parties
(CHPP), a hodge-podge of 26 "opposition" groups, which was formed
on April 16 but only announced on May 5.

Most of the parties in the CHPP are extreme right-wing
Duvalierist offspring which have been largely dormant since the
1991-1994 coup d'etat. The most infamous include the rabidly pro-
putschist ALAH of former deputy Reynold Georges, the PARADIS of
Vladimir Jeanty, the URN of the late Tonton Macoute chieftain
Roger Lafontant, and the PAN of expatriate Duvalierist radio
announcer Serge Beaulieu. There are also "moderate" neo-
Duvalierists like the MDN of former Duvalierist Social Affairs
minister Hubert de Ronceray, the MKN of former Duvalierist Health
Minister Dr. Volvick Remy-Joseph, and the MODELH-PRDH of former
Gen. Henri Namphy's Justice Minister Francois Latortue.

Also present in the front is the RDNP of Leslie Manigat, the
former president who Namphy installed through a military-run
"election" and then, 8 months later, uninstalled through a coup.

The CHPP seems centered around the man who has been
Washington's principal pawn in Haiti since he was loaned by the
World Bank to act as dictator Jean-Claude Duvalier's Finance
Minister in 1982: Marc Bazin and his Movement for the
Installation of Democracy in Haiti (MIDH).

In the Dec. 16, 1990 presidential election, Bazin was Jean-
Bertrand Aristide's distant runner-up, thanks mainly to the
millions of dollars in backing he received from the NED. His
electoral coalition at that time also included the MNP-28 of
Dejean Belizaire and PANPRA of Serge Gilles, who are also both
CHPP members. Bazin also acted as Prime Minister during most of
the military coup, enlisting the generous collaboration of
Gilles, Belizaire, and their parties.

Finally, the "left balance" to the lop-sided CHPP comes from
the Democratic Unity Convention (KID) of Evans Paul, known also
as "Konpe Plim," the former mayor of Port-au-Prince and a leader
of the National Front for Change and Democracy (FNCD), which
sponsored Aristide's 1990 run. Paul -- the consummate opportunist
-- was forced to join the CHPP on his own, since his usual
partner, Turneb Delpe of the PNDPH, the only other significant
party left in the old FNCD coalition, prudently demurred from
joining the CHPP. Delpe said he would continue to work for "a
national conference which is really its own master," a ludicrous
project which he has championed for months to assemble all the
Haitian parties and "particles" around a table to "talk out" a
solution to the country's political impasse.


http://www.ainfos.ca/98/may/ainfos00173.html

people don't have the slightest clue........even the putatively liberal replacements for Ski and Skinner are currently bemoaning the San Marcos' like atmosphere of Haiti, comparing Aristide to a Woody Allen revolutionary-gone mental (my words), saying that he had to go, but displaying their TOTAL ignorance of the reality of the scene.

they went as far as to compare it to the US-led COUP attempt in Venezuela, likewise calling Chavez a no-good enemy of the people!

time for a retch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. more on media shenannigans, plus other stuff

Judging by the corporate media’s recent coverage of the crisis in Haiti, one might be led to believe that they are “aiding and abetting” an attempted coup d’etat aimed at the democratically elected Jean Bertand Aristide. On a daily basis, mainstream international media is churning out stories provided mainly by the Associated Press and Reuters that have little basis in fact.

On Feb. 10th, the Globe and Mail, Canada’s main national daily, reprinted an AP article that relied on Haiti’s elite-owned Radio Vision 2000. <1> This article contrasted the recent “violent uprising” in Gonaives, Haiti’s fourth-largest city, with the 1986 uprising that saw the overthrow of the oppressive Duvalier dictatorship. The inevitable conclusion that the Canadian readership is steered toward is that Aristide is, or could be, a dictator, who may or may not deserve what he is about to get. This is hardly the kind of context that will compel citizens to lend support to the embattled Haitians.

The Globe’s paul Knox has been reporting from Haiti since Feb. 11th, and has submitted two stories thus far, neither of which have strayed from the “disinformation loop” which sees the recycling of dubious elite-spawned information by the corporate press corps. The same context as above is given credence - that Aristide faces a legitimate opposition that has every right to support his violent overthrow. Knox quotes Charles Baker, a wealthy factory owner who says: “We are all fighting for the same thing. Aristide has to resign.” <2>

Canada’s other national daily, the National Post has no problem running headlines like the one featured on February 13th website: “Rock-throwing Aristide militants force opponents to cancel protest march.” <3> Nowhere in the article is President Aristide’s press release mentioned, which condemned the obstruction of the protest, and called for the constitutional right of peaceful demonstration to be adhered to.

Interestingly, the corporate media has neglected to mention that the “opposition” to which they refer and repeatedly give legitimacy to, only represents a meagre 8 per cent of registered voters in Haiti, according to a US poll conducted in 2000. According to the Council on Hemispheric Affairs , “their only policy goal seems to be reconstituting the army and the implementation of rigorous structural adjustment programs.” <4> As corporate journalists rely on the opposition for little more than inflammatory soundbites, information that would otherwise be sought to lend their efforts credibility is repeatedly overlooked.


http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=21&ItemID=4977

this is an excellent, brief overview of what's happened to Haiti due to World Bank, IMF, US, media complicity

lots of links, too:

<1> Globe and Mail, February 10, 2004, “Haitian Insurrection Spreads to several more towns.” A16.

<2> Globe and Mail, February 11, 2004 “Haiti’s ‘peaceful people’ erupt in Violence”, A16.

<3> National Post, February 13, 2004.

<4> “Unfair and Indecent Diplomacy: Washington’s Vendetta against Haiti’s President Aristide,” January 15, 2004.

<5> Transcript obtained from Haiti’s Foreign Press Liason, Michelle Karshan, February 11, 2004.

<6> From the office of Congresswoman Barbara Lee. Contact: 202-225-2398

<7> Alex Dupuy, “Haiti in the New World Order: The Limits of Democratic Revolution,” p. 7.

<8> See Chomsky’s “The Tragedy of Haiti” in his “Year 501: The Conquest Continues” pp. 197-219.

<9> Susan George’s “A Short History of Neoliberalism” speech, March 1999:
http://www.globalpolicy.org/globaliz/econ/histneol.htm

<10> See The Guardian’s “Haiti: proof of hypocrisy”, April 11, 2002:

<11> Excerpts from Aristide’s book at:

<12> Quoting the Brookings Institution’s “U.S. Relations with the World Bank: 1945-1992”: “More than any other country, the United States has shaped and directed the institutional evolution, policies, and activities of the World Bank,” p. 88. The Brookings Institution, incidentally, is a known affiliate of the Haiti Democracy Project, which is friendly with Andre Apaid Jr., and G-184.

<13> See George’s “The Debt Boomerang,” 1992.

<14> Ibid.

<15> Bush II quote, U.S. Department of State website:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Excellent stuff ! Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
30. The US factories in Haiti
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Global_Secrets_Lies/WorkingForRAt_DisneyHaiti.html

The **weekly wages** in Haiti for a garment factory worker are $15.00. Fifteen dollars PER WEEK for a 65 Hour work week.
No pesky OSHA, no pesky unions, no pesky rights to worry about!

You can see why Bush want's to protect the US owned factories. This article is old but still accurate.

Working for the Rat
by Murray MacAdam
Report on a spirited North American campaign to improve working conditions for Disney textile workers in Haiti.
New Internationalist magazine, December 1998

<snip>

He is paid according to a piece rate system which means the more garments he finishes the more he earns. If he meets the quota set by management he can reach the top rate (around 42 cents an hour). But even the best sewers only reach quota two or three times a week.
When Remi was interviewed by US journalist Mary Ann Sabo he told her he had been working as a machine operator for five years but still earns just 30 cents an hour. That's the official minimum wage in Haiti and works out to $2.40 a day or $624 a year. Every day Remi walks 45 minutes to the factory from his home in one of Port-au-Prince's worst slums to save money. Even so, after buying food and water and paying for his daughter's schooling his paycheque is almost gone.

<snip>
The facts bear him out: much of the food in Haiti is imported and prices can match those in the West. A simple meal of rice and beans with tomato paste and bread costs a family $2.89 - more than the $2.40 that Remi earns on average each day. And that doesn't include weekly rent of $5.13 for his modest one-room house, clothes or other necessities. No wonder some workers gulp down their lunch in a few minutes so they can race back to their sewing machines to earn more money.

<snip>

The NLC has also produced Mickey Mouse Goes To Haiti, a video shot in the Caribbean country which unveils the stark poverty of Disney contract workers. 'They don't treat us like human beings,' says one worker, wearing a mask for fear of company reprisals. 'The quota is too much. When I go home I collapse. I ask God and the international community to speak up for the Haitian people.' Other workers speak of being trapped in debt all their lives just to survive. 'The day I get paid, the children still go to bed hungry,' says one.

<snip>

Haiti is the poorest country in the Caribbean and one of the poorest in the Americas. The jobless rate hovers near 70 per cent which means employers have the upper hand in determining wages. Workers bold enough to try forming unions are routinely demoted, fired and blacklisted. (One reason for Haiti's 1991 coup was to prevent former President Aristide from raising wages from the existing 21 cents an hour to 50 cents an hour.)

<snip>

It's clear that the multi-billion dollar firm could easily afford to pay workers in Haiti, China and elsewhere a living wage. Disney CEO Eisner received over $185 million in pay and stock options in 1996. It would take a Haitian worker sewing Disney garments 156 years to earn what Eisner was paid in an hour. The NLC found that for every pair of Pocahontas pajamas sold in the US for $11.97, a Disney worker received just 7 cents. Disney contractors in Haiti have admitted that their profit margins are 12 to 17 per cent, triple the typical rate for US manufacturers.

<snip>

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Global_Secrets_Lies/WorkingForRAt_DisneyHaiti.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. thirdworldtraveller....most excellent site
discovered that while looking up quotes for Mark Hertsgaard on Reagan's media domination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC