I just don't see why *Bush doesn't knock over a few banks...

[Junkdrawer]

1.) If he chooses the right banks, it could end up totaling to a tidy sum.

2.) There is zero chance he'd get caught. Heck, there's zero chance any Democratic leader would dare suggest he may have done it.

But, most importantly:

3.) They'd further divide the Democratic Party in to the few that believe Bush could have done it, the even fewer "conspiracy theorists" who would believe their eyes and outright accuse him of doing it, and the vast majority who believe it absurd that a sitting President would do such a thing.

Rove is really missing an opportunity here.

[shanti]

1. why do that

when the u.s. treasury and the ssa is available? :eyes:

[Junkdrawer]

4. Everyone expects him to do that...

but no one would expect him to, say, oust a democratically elected leader at gunpoint in broad daylight.

[RaulGroom]

2. You've obviously never robbed a bank

It's hard work! Requires a lot of concentration and planning. Not Little George's strong suit.

[Uber Llama]

3. Who says he hasn't?

You know you can't trust BushCheneyAshcroft & Co.

[htuttle]

5. Robbing banks is his brother Neil's turf

George is more of a stock fraud-type guy.