Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who would you have voted for in 1912?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:11 AM
Original message
Poll question: Who would you have voted for in 1912?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. to those voting for Teddy Roosevelt:
You have forfeited your right to complain about the W regime's foreign policy. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I'm kicking myself right now.
Because I DID vote for Roosevelt. And you're exactly right. Roosevelt's foreign policy (a continuation of McKinley's) was imperialistic. VERY much like the current administration's...

I should have voted for Debs.

My bad.

Terry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Today's litmus test
Sorry, we don't ever forfeit anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. ok
Then the floor is yours, be my guest:--explain how it wouldn't be hypocritical and contradictory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. the floor is still yours..
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. still open..
mobuto can jump in in your place if he so desires..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Wasn't here
You asked us to vote in 1912, not 2004. We picked the best candidate during that time. The best candidate in that time was TR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Not exactly my question..
Read the posts again, if necessary. On what possible grounds would it not be hypocritical and contradictory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. I read the posts
The elections have absolutely NOTHING to do with one another. Nor do the worlds they took place in. Ninety years is a damn long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. Yet some things don't change
how would it not be hypocritical and contradictory? I don't really expect an answer, because there isn't one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. There really is one
It's a complete and totally different time and different election with different people running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Not at all
Theodore Roosevelt's foreign policy was very different from George Dubya's.

TR believed one should speak softly and carry a big stick. Bush believes you should speak loudly and then beat yourself on the head.

We need another Teddy Roosevelt; we don't need another Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. I agree Aidoneus
TR set the tone for aggressive action in SA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelocalkgb Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. You're right
The Roosevelt Corollary has caused the US to do some really jacked up stuff in Latin America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Eash after, Right?
!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. My sig line should give away my choice
One of the most honorable Americans who ever lived, Eugene Victor Debs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. Remember ...
... women didn't have the right to vote then. IMHO, that goes a long way towards shining some light on the stereotyped public persona of those elected to national office prior to 1920.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You beat me to it!
I couldn't have voted then. However, it's primary day here in Ohio and my avatar and sig-line reflect that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. TahitiNut and Maeve: Susan B. Anthony & Eugene Debs
In 1905, the great Susan B. Anthony and the also great Eugene Debs had this to say to each other:

Anthony: "Give us suffrage, and we'll give you socialism."

Debs: "Give us socialism, and we'll give you the vote."

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
27. In Some States they Could
in some states women could vote...

State Date
Wyoming 1890
Utah 1890
Colorado 1893
Idaho 1896
Washington 1910
California 1911
Oregon 1912
Kansas 1912
Arizona 1912


Other states had Women’s suffrage in such thing as School Board elections.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. William Taft
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 11:18 AM by bryant69
He's the guy. It's easy to come up with rhymes for Raft, and I figure back then the way you became poet laureat was to stand outside the White House shouting rhymes about how great the President is.

"Oh that Taft
He Hates Graft
He has a Raft
Laws he will Craft."

And so on. Being Poet Laureate really looks good on the old resume. But how many rhymes are there for Roosevelt. Or Wilson. Or Debs (accidently got the wrong socialist first time around). None. That's how many. I haven't spent any time thinking about it, but I'm quite sure that I'm correct.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. Debs all the way in '12!
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 10:53 AM by Minstrel Boy
One of my American heroes. (Though I could have voted only if Madison had won the War of 1812.)


American Socialist leader Eugene V. Debs, addressing a crowd in Columbus in 1918. For this speech he was convicted and jailed under the Espionage Act.

"While there is a lower class, I am in it; while there is a criminal element, I am of it; while there is a soul in prison, I am not free."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
13. Theodore Roosevelt
My great-grandfather was the leader of TR's Bull Moose party in NYC. The man was the most remarkable President we've ever had. He may have been the smartest President we've ever had, and he was extraordinarily Progressive when he didn't have to be. He was far superior to Wilson and Taft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. Eugene Debs
Debs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Again, I must remind the MEN that start these threads that as a WOMAN
I would not have been allowed to vote in 1912.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. No one. As a woman I wouldn't have been able to vote.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Why do these guys not seem to understand this? This is about the 5th
thread with this type of question and the guys really get upset when I post this answer, saying it is just a hypothetical question and hypothetical or not we could not vote. It seems pretty realistic to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
23. First I'd have to get a sex change....
I'd be out there agitating for the right to vote. Women weren't allowed to vote until August 26, 1920.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
24. Roosevelt or Wilson
Either way you get WWI, but with Wilson you get it later and reluctantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Wilson also had his version of John Ashcroft as Attorney General
Palmer had Emma Goldman deported:

In 1919, a series of politically motivated bombing attempts culminated in an explosion at the Washington home of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer. The federal government responded by rounding up thousands of suspected subversive immigrants across the country. They were held in unconscionable conditions, interrogated incommunicado, and in some cases tortured. In the end, more than 500 were deported, not for the bombing, but for their political associations. The “Palmer Raids,” were led in part by a young J. Edgar Hoover, then head of the Justice Department’s Alien Radical division. Eventually criticism of the raids brought the nation’s first Red Scare to what appeared to be an end.

http://www.amnestyusa.org/usacrisis/ashcroftraids.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Not in 1912
Palmer was Wilson's last Attorney General. Wilson's stroke so disabled him that Palmer had free reign. One of Wilson's WORST appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Yes... Mitchell Palmer was a real a-hole...
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USApalmerA.htm

<snip>
Worried by the revolution that had taken place in Russia, Palmer became convinced that Communist agents were planning to overthrow the American government. His view was reinforced by the discovery of thirty-eight bombs sent to leading politicians and the Italian anarchist who blew himself up outside Palmer's Washington home. Palmer recruited John Edgar Hoover as his special assistant and together they used the Espionage Act (1917) and the Sedition Act (1918) to launch a campaign against radicals and left-wing organizations.

Palmer claimed that Communist agents from Russia were planning to overthrow the American government. On 7th November, 1919, the second anniversary of the Russian Revolution, over 10,000 suspected communists and anarchists were arrested. Palmer and Hoover found no evidence of a proposed revolution but large number of these suspects were held without trial for a long time. The vast majority were eventually released but Emma Goldman and 247 other people, were deported to Russia.

In January, 1920, another 6,000 were arrested and held without trial. These raids took place in several cities and became known as the Palmer Raids. A. Mitchell Palmer and John Edgar Hoover found no evidence of a proposed revolution but large number of these suspects, many of them members of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), continued to be held without trial. When Palmer announced that the communist revolution was likely to take place on 1st May, mass panic took place. In New York, five elected Socialists were expelled from the legislature.
</snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. AND NOTHING HAPPENED!
Edited on Wed Mar-03-04 09:28 AM by WoodrowFan
Or as Palmer said "OOPS! I was mislead by bad intelligence!"

BTW, his house is a couple blocks from where I work. He lived across the street from FDR. When Isabel came through here in 2003 it destroyed the old tree that was outside FDR's home when he lived there. I took a couple of pieces from the sidewalk after the storm. Supposedly parts of the bomber landed in that tree!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. I believe it was little James Roosevelt...
...that found a large chunk of bone on the street and dutifully gave it to his horrified father (FDR, while Asst SecNav).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
34. TR, a question
Could his mere presence have stopped or delayed WWI, thwarted the pathetic "trigger" of the assassination of a petty Duke? Was Roosevelt cleared out of the way so the mega corporations could go about their business in various countries?

Wasn't the trouble that TR stepped aside in the first place until he realized the party had betrayed him and his ideals? I'm a little foggy here, especially as to why this is relevant today.

Wilson became another great leader consumed by a war and forced to fall short on the peace by the Republicans(who did the same to Lincoln).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Roosevelt was gung-ho on US entry into WWI
Most people like to deny the fact that Roosevelt was an ultra-hawk, by citing his saying, "Speak softly, and carry a big stick" as some kind of proof of moderation. But the truth is that Roosevelt was a person who not only was a hawk, but saw war as one of the natural callings of mankind. Under his watch, we saw the imposition of the Platt Amendment on Cuba (which basically guaranteed its status as a US "colony"), the forced secession of Panama from Colombia for the purposes of building the Panama Canal, the slaughter of native resistance and civilians in the Philippines, and so on.

In fact, his clamoring for US entry into WWI coupled with his vigorous support of that entry once it occurred produced a major split in the progressive movement. On one side was TR -- and a faction of progressives that supported overt militarism and what would be now considered to be some completely racist attitudes toward immigrants. On the other was Robert LaFollette, the Senator from Wisconsin who held up the Senate vote for US entry into the war for 24 hours and supported outspoken dissidents like Eugene Debs and "Red Emma" Goldman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. TR would have entered in 1915
Roosevelt was VERY upset when Wilson refused to go to war over the Lusitania in May 1915 calling hima "coward" and every other name he could think of.


BTW, one of the main issues in 1912 was the financial support the Trusts gave to Roosevelt in 1904 and again in 1912. He got a HUGE amount of corporate money compared to the Democratic candidate in both elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Which just goes to prove...
... how little many of those expressing such admiration for TR really know about him.

As an environmentalist, he was absolutely fantastic. As a foe of corporate power, he was actually overrated -- his administrations actually enacted fewer reforms than McKinley's. And as far as military matters are concerned, he was an unabashed imperialist hawk who believed fully in the theory of American exceptionalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Athame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
37. Though I did not have the franchise
I would not have voted for the Democrat. Wilson was no friend to women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. He did support Woman's sufferage
He came to it late, but he did come around, mostly because of his daughters' influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC