Will Sean Hannity respond to this?

[11 Bravo]

He was babbling yesterday about how Hussein MAY have had WMDs and how Iraq MAY have secretly moved them to Syria. I finally snapped and sent him the following:

Dear Mr. Hannity,
I feel compelled to alert you to yet another possible threat America faces at the hands of the evil one. Saddam Hussein MAY have collected an army of marauding chipmunks, infected them with syphillis, and trained them to infiltrate your home under cover of darkness to nibble on your shriveled and pathetic little dick as you sleep. Granted, there is not one fucking shred of evidence to support this claim; but it clearly meets any journalistic standards you have set for yourself. Besides, in these perilous times one can't be too careful, eh?
Sincerely,

[nini]

1. LOL..

geez, I almost spit my coffee out when I got to the shrivled part.

Good one, but I doubt he'll respond :-)

[HawkerHurricane]

2. I like it, but...

You should have left out "to nibble on your shriveled and pathetic little dick as you sleep"... By putting that in, even though it's funny, let's the censors delete it... or worse, makes it easier to mock as 'typical left wing psuedo porn'.

[Screaming Lord Byron]

3. Yeah, that's what I'd do if my country was invaded, move all means of

retaliation abroad, and not myself.
Idiot.

[tom_paine]

4. ROFLMAO

[Tank in Texas]

5. No but Colmes might...

...if he mistakes it for a personal ad placed by the chipmunks.

I wish Faux News had the wherewithal to get a REAL liberal with a REAL voice to co-host that show.

[CityZen-X]

6. Sham The Squirrel Nut Zip Head

I am convinced that Shammighty smokes crack (butt-crack) and slams Ripple intravenously. He is nothing more than a passing flatulence in a padded room.

[treepig]

7. an army of marauding, syphillis infected chipmunks??

sent to attack mr. hannity?

come on - isn't that just a bit over the top?

i think everyone knows that those chipmunks were sent with the specific purpose of infiltrating the maryland firewood industry:

cord (cd) <1>
a traditional unit of volume used to measure stacked firewood. Like most traditional units of trade, the cord has varied somewhat according to local custom. In the United States, the cord is defined legally as the volume of a stack of firewood 4 feet wide, 8 feet long, and 4 feet high. (In Maryland, the law specifies that the wood be stacked "tight enough that a chipmunk cannot run through it." Presumably it is up to the buyer to provide the chipmunk.) One cord is a volume of 128 cubic feet, about 3.6247 cubic meters, or 3.6247 steres. The name apparently comes from an old method of measuring a stack of firewood using a cord or string.

http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/dictC.html

[maggrwaggr]

8. send him this. Watch his head explode

WMD's my ass. Here's why we invaded Iraq:

From a DIA analyst who was there:

http://www.laweekly.com/ink/04/13/news-cooper.php
(snip)

One of those reasons is that sanctions and containment were working and everybody pretty much knew it. Many companies around the world were preparing to do business with Iraq in anticipation of a lifting of sanctions. But the U.S. and the U.K. had been bombing northern and southern Iraq since 1991. So it was very unlikely that we would be in any kind of position to gain significant contracts in any post-sanctions Iraq. And those sanctions were going to be lifted soon, Saddam would still be in place, and we would get no financial benefit.

The second reason has to do with our military-basing posture in the region. We had been very dissatisfied with our relations with Saudi Arabia, particularly the restrictions on our basing. And also there was dissatisfaction from the people of Saudi Arabia. So we were looking for alternate strategic locations beyond Kuwait, beyond Qatar, to secure something we had been searching for since the days of Carter — to secure the energy lines of communication in the region. Bases in Iraq, then, were very important — that is, if you hold that is America’s role in the world. Saddam Hussein was not about to invite us in.

The last reason is the conversion, the switch Saddam Hussein made in the Food for Oil program, from the dollar to the euro. He did this, by the way, long before 9/11, in November 2000 — selling his oil for euros. The oil sales permitted in that program aren’t very much. But when the sanctions would be lifted, the sales from the country with the second largest oil reserves on the planet would have been moving to the euro.

The U.S. dollar is in a sensitive period because we are a debtor nation now. Our currency is still popular, but it’s not backed up like it used to be. If oil, a very solid commodity, is traded on the euro, that could cause massive, almost glacial, shifts in confidence in trading on the dollar. So one of the first executive orders that Bush signed in May <2003> switched trading on Iraq’s oil back to the dollar.
(snip)

[RebelOne]

9. I doubt that he will respond, as I have sent him a lot of e-mails

refuting his lies. And I have never received any answer. Guess he didn't have any info to back up his claims. But I love your e-mail to him. And he says that he reads all his e-mails and wonders why he is always being attacked. Duh!!!

[OneTwentyoNine]

10. No...but he was mentioning today about protests at his em.."tour stops"

He's going to be in Salt Lake soon,I guess they always have a big crowd protesting Baby Jesus. He's going to be here on March 10th,it'll be interesting to see if we can get a protest going.

David

[efhmc]

11. Never seen the show but you are definitely a funny guy.