Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who Are Your Favorite Political Philosophers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 07:18 PM
Original message
Who Are Your Favorite Political Philosophers
Mine are

Marx

Rousseau

John Stuart Mill

and

Edmund Burke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dewey, Locke, Rawls nt
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I read Locke
of course. I never led Dewey and Rawls but I have seen them referenced.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrumiousBandersnatch Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Locke, Mills and Rawls.....
Great thread and it is interesting to read the favorites of others :-) Ethics was my favorite course and I am slowly trying to learn more about other philosophers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've read more of the Social philosophers, like Verber, Mark and
just loved all that social stuff. Bismark did some wild things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Verber? Mark?
Do you mean Weber and Marx?:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. Otto Von Bismarck
created the German social security system. Though he was an arch conservative or reactionary he realized capitalism needed to reform itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jesus Christ
Healing the sick. Feeding the poor. Antagonizing the governmant. Blessing peacemakers.

We should be so lucky!


He may be the Shrub's fav, too, but he obviously hasn't learned anything from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mreilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bertrand Russell
Love the guy. "Why I am not a Christian" is one of my favorite works. I also love Emerson. I had a fling with some of Thoreau's works but came to realize you're either an Emerson fan or a Thoreau fan, and I lean more towards Emerson.

However, my favorite political philosopher is my father (he's not famous; you wouldn't have heard of him). Ultraliberal, appreciates the fine things in life such as quiet nights and sunny mornings, and has given me much useful advice on how to stay detached from this consumeristic mass-media-dominated society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Mark Twain!
"Suppose I were and idiot and suppose I were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself."

:evilgrin:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Marx, Durkheim, Weber
Edited on Sat Aug-02-03 11:22 PM by Redleg
with a bit of Adam Smith mixed-in for good measure! Okay, I know Smith is primarily an economist (as was Marx) but The Wealth of Nations is an important (and often misquoted) book in political economy.

Also J.S. Mill's "On Liberty."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pierre Bourdieu....
Pierre Bourdieu
Richard Rorty
William James

I like Jacques Derrida as a thinker, but when he turns to politics, he's less compelling for me. Same with Leotard and Kristeva, among my favorite thinkers. I could say as much about the phenomenologists, from Sartre and Merleau-Ponty and Levinas and lateley Irigaray, I enjoy their thinking but tend to tune out some of the political debates.

Here's where I scold myself for not having dug into Arendt, because I think I would enjoy her political ideas. Adorno and company never quite turned me on, intellectually.

Cornel West, I like where he's coming from. Sometimes I wish his ideas were more richly presented, but he's definitely provocative and deep.

Bourdieu is far and away the political philosopher I understand and enjoy and sympathize with most. But I always reserve a place in my thinking for the pragmatists, and especially the pluralism of William James.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Noam Chomsky
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskyite2 Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. chomsky isnt really a philosopher
hes more of a commentator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. My favorite political philosopher is Jesus Christ.
And unlike Bush Jr, I've actually read His stuff :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Against ME Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Explain to me
how JC is a political philosopher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoothyking Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. I'll answer this one

Scripture touches into all fields of life. If you read the Gospels and try to interpret them from a political frame of mind, you'll get it.

The fact that he spent his whole life helping the poor and the neglected shows where his priorities are.....:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Against ME Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. John Stewart Mills, and Marx.
You cannot truly appreciate Marx, untill you know how he lived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. My Fab 3
Mills,

Locke,

and

Henry Lewis Mencken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskyite2 Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. why does every one like LOCKE?
classical liberalism is the basis of modern conservatism.

although at the time they may have seemed quite nice...being into social freedom...which wasnt the norm of the day...what with slavery, and women not being able to vote...they also were champions of freemarket economics.

it is debatable whether or not locke would have had the same feelings about economics if he had lived a a century and a half later, when the true face of industrial capitalism would show its ugly face. but either way...if u read locke as it is...with out making historical edits(assumptions)...he is preaching a very bush-friendly mantra.

just so ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. Modern conservatism is based on Burke, not Locke.
Edited on Sun Aug-03-03 11:58 AM by poskonig
Locke is responsible for the liberal tradition all the way to Mill and beyond. While libertarians indeed share our "heritage," conservatives do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. Hume, I think...
...as well as Russell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
17. Proudhon.
Pure genius that guy had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskyite2 Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. are u kidding me? that guy was on the pipe
he was all over the place, and if u read his whole lifes work, he contridicts himself a thousand times over.

give me bakunin any day.....a REAL anarchist, who new man kind, and wasnt full of himself, and who wasnt trying to make history, coughcoughMARXcoughcough..and who wasnt full of himself...like proudhon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskyite2 Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. WHERE THE SHOE STORE AT
holler, buster could own proudhon any day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskyite2 Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. bump
bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Agree about his later years.
But his early assessments about property and liberty were right on target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. Oh, and I agree that he was full of himself, but that's what I liked.
His early writings pretty much slammed the rest of economic philosophy in the face, and his writing style is just an amusing read. Many people would be turned off by it, but not me.

Plus, there are a lot of good Proudhon quotes out there. And I do believe that even though he was trying to make a name of himself by putting himself in the spotlight as he did (running for governmental positions and so on), he believed the stuff he was saying. I also believe he won the ‘famous’ arguments with Marx, and (less famous arguments with) Bastiat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
21. ditto
minus Marx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskyite2 Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
24. BAKUNIN!!!
whos with me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskyite2 Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. no one, apparently
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. He's good, but I'm more of an individualist.
So I don't particularly like his Banks of Exchange and so on. I mean, they're quite brilliant, as far as access and use goes, but I think that it's unrealistic on our current economic level.

Bookchin is another good anarchist thinker, but I disagree with a lot of his interdependency stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
25. Political Philosophy Favourites:
Pre-20th century:
-JJ Rousseau
-John Locke
-J.S. Mill
-Thucydides

-Wish their writing didn't make my head spin: Kant and Hegel. Marx is too dreary.
-Honorable mentions: Parmenides and Mary Wollstonecraft.

Last 100 years:
-John Rawls
-Jurgen Habermas
-Michael Walzer (even he has a hard time seeing past his pro-Israel bias)
-Richard Rorty (even if I disagree with him quite strongly)

-Hannah Arendt, Jeremy Waldron, Ronald Dworkin, Charles Taylor, and Martha Nussbaum are all on the bubble; Dewey is on the reading list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
26. that famous pair
... Groucho Marx and John Lennon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
27. After reading all the political philosophers
I ended up where I began. In the middle tilting ever so slightly to the left. I tend to believe the greatest right of all is the right to be left alone which is basically what John Stuart Mill argued in "On Liberty".

I liked Marx because he was a first rate polemicist. He could cut his enemies to shreds with a pen.

I liked Rousseau because his concept of being "forced to be free" . I believe some folks need to be "forced to be free"; freed from their selfishness and ignorance but I don't know how to accomplish it without violating my essentially liberterian principals.

I liked Locke because he is the father ,IMHO, of liberterianism.

When I was in college I didn't like Burke. I confused being a conservative with being a reactionary. But I will listen to the arguments of a thoughtful conservative. Burke supported change that was a result of sober decision making. He supported the American Revolution but not the French Revolution because of it's excesses.
I doubt he would feel at home with today's conservatives nor would they feel at home with him.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. George Carlin and Monty Python
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoothyking Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. Plato and Aristotle

Neither are exclusively political, but both have written extensively
on the subject. Aristotle is very challenging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. Locke
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC