Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High court pulls reins on eminent domain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 10:03 PM
Original message
High court pulls reins on eminent domain
I believe this is how G DUHbya got the land for the Texas Rangers stadium.

Arvada thwarted in move to take lake for Wal-Mart

By Alicia Caldwell
Denver Post Staff Writer

In a sharp rebuke to aggressive urban renewal authorities, the Colorado Supreme Court on Monday overturned Arvada's effort to condemn part of a lake for a Wal-Mart project.

The court said Arvada's urban renewal authority could not rely on a 1981 finding of blight to justify using eminent domain in an area that had been redeveloped since then.

"I think the court is sending a message to urban renewal authorities - you've gone too far," said Allan Hale, a Denver lawyer who specializes in eminent domain law. "The courts have not reined them in, until now."

-more-

http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~53~1990418,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Government does this all the time
A city near mine went through something similar recently. They had a turn of the century 4 story building, one of only a handful of old commercial buildings left in the city and the ONLY one still in original condition, sitting deserted on a prime lot downtown. A developer came in, bought the building, and announced that it would be renovated, brought up to modern code, and then used as a senior citizens assisted care home. The city, rather than embracing the offer to improve this eyesore, denied request after request to fix up the building, always moving the bar a little higher and finding new ways to deny the building permits. Finally, after years of haggling, the city condemned the building and started emminent domain proceedings. They claimed that the building was "blight" (ignoring the fact that they themselves had blocked its improvement) and forcefully took the building from the owner claiming that it was about to fall down. When the demolition company took the wrecking ball to it the next year, they stated that it was "one of the toughest and most well built buildings they'd ever seen".

Any guesses on what sits on that lot today? The new City Hall :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC