Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forget Nader....will Bush be on the Ballot in every state?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 11:44 PM
Original message
Forget Nader....will Bush be on the Ballot in every state?
I've heard reports that, because of the late GOP convention, Boosh might miss the filing date in several states. Is this true, and does anybody have any updates? The states I've heard are:

Alabama (already cut a deal)
Illinois
California
West Virginia
Indiana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Illinois is the last holdout
They were talking about a deal (local politics has a lot to do with the terms of a deal), but nothing has been finalized. The last propsed deal fell through. Be aware, though, that Republicans will have the temper tantrum of the century if the rules are not changed special just for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Two more states BOOSH might loose.
Indiana, West Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Illinois is a win/win for us
They will bend over backwards to get him on the ballots so Illinois Dems will be able to gain significant accessions in any deal that is struck. In the end though it on't matter because Bush has NO chance to win the state. Or rather I should say that if something goes so wrong he does win Illinois than we have obviously lost anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. so now he gets to opening
out loud break the laws. amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. They violated election
rules in order to further exploit the 9/11 dead for political "advantage" and should have been left off. The Democrats in most of those states allowed the breaking of these rules. I guess they still think the "nice guy" act is working while they are getting the crap beat outta them. I will NEVER understand their brand of "opposition", if Clinton pulled this crap does anyone actually think the rethugs would let him on the ballot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. I've heard this too, but how did Rove & Co. screw up?
I would have thought it was someting done by a $5.00 hr clerk to get the Pres registered for the ballot in every state. HOW did the Rove Co. screw up this bad? O think it really funny, and dishonest or not will probably be fixed by election time, but BOY, the well coordinated campaign isn't as good as everybody thinks, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. No Special Rules
I sent a letter to my Repugnican state legistlators (I love to tweak those little fellas) that making a special change to enable Bunnypants on the ballot here in Illinois will lead to other candidates being able to jump into an election with only a couple days to go since Bushyboy got special treatment, that means all candidate will.

One actually replied and claimed "the Democrats purposely are doing this to embarass "the pResident""...I wrote back that his continuing lies about Bush won't win him or his party any votes in this house. A lot of chuckling has been going on around here in Pleasant Valley Sunday as even the most staunch Repugnicans have long backed off Bunnypant's ability to be a real leader and now it's "steady leadership" crap. How much of a leader can you be when you can't even file the proper forms to get on a ballot...that is, of course, unless you have little regard for the Electoral system.

Yep, * will lose this state...and I sense it could be by as much as 10 points, a Democratic pick-up in the Senate, clearing out some of the Repugnican deadwood in our Congressional delegation (Henry Hyde, Phil Crane, Jerry (Ok, I'll stay in the closet) Weller) and larger Demcratic majorities in both state legislatures (bring on that FMA!).

In '84, after Raygun won this state, I was thinking of moving to a more "Democratic" state...now I'm in one...and we're not done yet, here!

Now a legal question...if Bunnypant's name is not on the ballot in Illinois, does this prohibit the running of those insulting ads (since he's not a legal candidate) or gets a smaller share of federal matching funds. Anyone wanna take a shot at this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bush and Kerry will be on all 50 ballots
If a state requires a party to announce their ballot selections prior to endorsing their candidate, the state would need to justify their law.

Bush will be on all 50 states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think thosed deals he is cutting to get on the ballots should be
heavily publicized. Would they cut the same deal for us in Alabama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpy the poopthrower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. He will be.
Laws don't matter where Bush is concerned. If they have to take the matter all the way to the Felonious Five, they will. And don't think "state's rights" will matter. They didn't in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC