Support the Constitutional Ban on Heterosexual Marriage!

[VoteClark]

Congressman Rangel (D-NY) recently introduced a bill for a Constitutional Ban on Heterosexual marriage. :wtf:

I am 100% for the recently introduced legislation to ban Straight people from getting married. Marriage should be strictly for Gay couples. Long before White men came to America and introduced things like intolerance, polygamy, incest, and overpopulating the world with sick heterosexuality, this land had gay marriage for thousands of years, now look at it, polluted and overpopulated, and destructive to society.

Marriage is clearly something that can NOT be handled by the straight population. AIDS has spread like crazy in places like Africa, China, and the Middle East because of promiscuous unprotected unnatural lust of straight people.

Over 50% of heterosexual couples break up in just 5 years. 72% of heterosexual marriages end in ten years. Clearly God did not intend for these people to be together if 72% can't stay together. Over 80% of straight couples have adulterous affairs. Even their political leaders and sports heroes engage in such immoral behavior. Often times with young women just over the age of 18 and not fully mature.

They also abuse their children. Many mothers even keep their babies in cars with the windows rolled up in 100 degree weather where their babies die a slow miserable death.

Many more babies are also slaughtered pointlessly before they are even born. 100% of abortions occur because of this sick heterosexual behavior. 1.2 million babies are killed every year from this act of self serving pleasure. Homosexual sex never results in the senseless murder of 1.2 million innocent babies.

Marriage is a sacred institution that should not be wasted on sinners. This people swore an oath to be monogamous, loyal, and faithful to their partners in front of court and/or church. At what point do we say enough is enough, 80% abuse and lie to God and their partners. Does it make sense to allow this to continue? If you had an 80% failure rate of postal delivery, and 80% failure rate of kids graduating, an 80% failure rate of anything, would you continue to fund it with government dollars, or would you move to a more proven successful plan?

Let us ban Straight Marriage, it is a failed institution that the taxpayers continue to fund. Call your Congress member and tell them, you support the Constitutional Ban on Straight Marriage, it is time to protect the morality of a great institution that God has given us between a woman and woman or a man and man, not between a man and woman.

:dunce: :dunce: :dunce: :dunce: :dunce: :dunce: :dunce: :dunce: :dunce:

J4Clark

[lcordero]

1. He does a lot of stuff that is "tongue in cheek"

Too bad all of the "tongue in cheek" stuff is true. I have a few friends that have told me that they were getting married, it seems that the same thing keeps slipping out of my mouth, "Better you than me".
I've never supported straight marriage but I don't think we should prevent gay people from making the same mistakes, just give them a warning.

[tedoll78]

2. Hooray!

With over a 50% divorce rate, heterosexuals are in no place to look down and judge homosexual couples. In fact, I think it's safe to say that overall, heterosexuals have made a joke out of marriage. Don't take offense.. there are plenty of good and faithful heteros out there, but overall.. it's not a good tack record to run on..

[Booberdawg]

3. ROTFLOL!

I love Rangel.

He does do a good job of pointing out the mockery many straights make of the "sacred" institution of marriage.

[JohnKleeb]

6. Charley is something else

One of my favorite congresspeople and on the top of the list of congresspeople who I want to be my congressperson. I tell you him and John Conyers among other older democratic representives fight pretty hard still, Byrd does this too and so does Hollings. Most of our strongest fighters in Congress are Senior citizens.

[ButterflyBlood]

4. ha ha, that's great

so damn funny

[bushisanidiot]

5. ROFL! I love it!

Excellent points.. all TRUE!

[Clete]

7. Charlie is being funny.

Seriously, although I am married, if I lived in a truly egalitarian society I wouldn't bother. Heterosexual marriage is another institution designed to keep women subservient and second class in citizenship.

I believe the true family, as nature designed, is matrilineal. Children should take their mother's surnames, not their father's. If a woman wants to enter into some kind of contractual living arrangement with the father of her children, so be it, but if she doesn't, she can always look to her brothers and uncles for help in child-rearing.

In this kind of society, there are always a few of those kind of relatives lying around who need a home and who can contribute to the finances without the need to turn women into chattel, housekeepers and nannies.

So flame me. I know that everyone thinks that this idea is nutty.

[gulliver]

8. What are you smoking?

Let's have a link. Jeez, first you call vegetarians hypocrites, then you spout this nonsense about Rangel.

[Nikia]

9. Some reasons that homosexual marriage should be no big deal

I have no problem with homosexuality, but those that do should keep these things in mind. When political and religious leaders say that homosexual marriage threatens the institute of marriage, I think of some of those things. Many heterosexual marriages undermine marriages by adultery, abuse, and selfishness. Even for those who think that homosexuality is some kind of sin, homosexual couples should be the least of their worries in regards to the institute of marriage.

[goobergunch]

10. Doesn't exist...

I THOMASed everything Rangel introduced this Congress, and the only constitutional amendment was to establish the right to a home (H.J. Res. 47).