|
Edited on Sun Mar-14-04 05:07 PM by Bleachers7
First, Dean was right, we are not safer than we were pre-Iraq. I don't know why this was such a voodoo thing to say. He was 100% right. Iraqi's weren't trying to kill Americans every day (discounting the no fly zones). Al Queda, though weaker was positively affected by Iraq. They now have another failed state to work out of.
Second, DO NOT LIE TO THE CITIZENRY!!! The PP Spaniards tried to play politics with the attack. They insisted it was done by anyone but foreign terrorists. They spun, withheld, colluded and did everything else possible in this 2 day misinformation campaign. Thankfully the police and Spanish intelligence aren't as corrupt as parts of our government. I fear that the collusion in this government and endowment of fear may keep vital information from a frightened population.
Third, the Bushies do not like dissent. They tried hard to push the ETA angle. They do not want other governments changing their ways that supported us in Iraq. They do not want the (fake) coalition to fall apart. Spain leaving Iraq will be very embarrassing for Bushco. They cannot hide this from the American people (unless you watch Faux).
Fourth, Fox news is a big-time shill. There are some things that are too difficult for the Bush regime to respond to. They can't put out their true feelings. Faux has stepped in big-time today. They are trying hard to discredit the Socialists. They are saying Franco is a socialist. They are saying that the terrorists have won in Spain. I heard one of them say that this makes Bush stronger because the Dems are weak on national security. Fair and balanced my ass.
Fifth, Iraq was a huge distraction. The Spanish bombings might not have happened if we didn't dick around in Iraq. North Korea and Zimbabwe might not be running their mouths. We wouldn't have had to wait days to get into Liberia because of troop shortages. They did not put enough troops into Afghanistan for that war. They withheld troops to save them for Iraq. That's partly why Osama is still on the loose. Osama might have been caught if we used the same (or similar) force in Afghanistan. There are so many other situations. Bush has made our military and influence in the world weaker. That's a very bad thing.
Sixth, this proves that terrorists can have an affect of elections. Spain was very anti-war and the bombing helped push the socialists over the top. I think that there are two very possible scenarios here. One is an attack in the US would probably make Bush stronger in the very short term. But it would make him weaker in the long term. The terrorists are probably dumb enough to think that they would get a break with Generalissimo Bush out of power. They would be wrong, but I still think they may take a crack at it. An attack on the US would prove that Bushco have not been handling the terror war correctly. So a bombing here way before the election is probably bad for Bush. If it a few days before like in Spain, Bush might benefit. I think Al Queda might play this game.
Finally, I just want to say that I hope nothing happens in the US. I want to beat Bush and friends fair and square. No help needed from the terrorists. Bush and friends have been lying, spinning and misleading all over the world. I just hope that Americans can see through the Faux bullshit and do the right thing in November. Bush has been a failure on the war on terror, he needs to be replaced.
|