Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush wants warning labels on condoms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 06:51 AM
Original message
Bush wants warning labels on condoms
http://www.advocate.com/new_news.asp?id=11662&sd=03/13/04-03/15/04

The Bush administration is considering requiring warning labels on condom packages to read that the contraceptive devices do not protect users from all sexually transmitted diseases. Recent studies indicate condoms do not safeguard against human papillomavirus, or HPV, a little-known but widespread sexually transmitted disease that can cause genital warts or cervical cancer. The Food and Drug Administration "has developed a regulatory plan to provide condom users with a consistent labeling message and the protection they should expect from condom use," said Daniel G. Schultz, director of the agency's Office of Device Evaluation. The agency "is preparing new guidance on condom labeling to address these issues," Schultz told members of a House government reform subcommittee Thursday during a hearing called by Republican representatives who are outspoken critics of condom use and sexual health studies conducted with federal research dollars.

Package labels now say that condoms, if properly used, reduce the risk of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases. The question now is whether that statement needs to have any additional information regarding protection against HPV without discouraging people from using condoms for HIV protection. Some lawmakers fear that such labels could turn people away from using condoms, thereby increasing the risk of contracting diseases such as HIV, chlamydia, and gonorrhea. There are also worries that would-be condom users would confuse HPV with HIV and shun condom use for sexual acts that could put them at high risk for HIV infection.
more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. To be honest - this is correct information
However, let's not create a witch hunt on condoms to the point that people will NOT use them. They are overwhelmingly important in the fight against AIDS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamondsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. It is correct info, and what scares me-
I know a woman with HPV personally. She's had it for years and nobody has ever told her what precautions if any she can take to prevent giving it to someone else.

I've had some of the best sex-ed anyone could ask for but knew essentially NOTHING about HPV until recently. It's a disease that needs one hell of a lot more public awareness work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. The real agenda is to put a non-specific warning on condoms
Edited on Mon Mar-15-04 11:23 AM by phoebe
in order for "we, the people" to stop using them. What do you bet that they won't be able to come up with a specific label because it will be too "graphic" for "Christian right"/teenageers to deal with and thus they will try to get away with something non-specific? Why the need for a task force for just this reason? They are betting on no-one bothering to read the fine print. Typical Bush strategery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. morality madness
the holier than thou crew at it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sure Bush couldn't read the label anyway
Not while he's fucking his boyfriend in a dark closet at the Whitehouse.

And no one else will read them either. I think they should put the phrase, "God gets pissed off with you when you use condoms," and it won't have any effect either.

http://brainbuttons.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. * can get his poxy brother to do the commercials. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
khashka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sure why not?
Provided we can stick warning labels on Bush as well.

Something like "voting for this man will destroy your soul".

(Actually HPV is a serious issue. I just question the motives behind this warning.)

I love Cronus's idea though. Every condom should come with a label that says "using this will really piss God off". Hey, it'd convince me to put one on :)

Khash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ze_dscherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. The simple use of a condom would have prevented G. W. Bush
Edited on Mon Mar-15-04 07:34 AM by ze_dscherman
Life is as 100% fatally ending, sexually transmitted disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
khashka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Anybody remember
the Durex commercials in the UK in the 80s? They'd show a hated politician (Sadam Hussein) or celebrity (Bonnie Langford) and then say something like "if only their parents had used a condom".

Nothing like that would ever air in the US. Sad to say.

Khash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Moving to GD
This is not breaking news, it was first carried several days ago from the Guardian.

Vive le Trojan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. So when was the last time anybody said....
"Hold up a minute, Baby, I gotta read the small print on this cock-sock wrapper!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvgwinn Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. condoms
I was just thinking the same thing. Who do you know that would stop and read the warnings on a box of condoms. Maybe they will put it on each one and make it so you can't use it until its read!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. warning: failure to use condoms may produce republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well, even a completely clueless boob is bound to get something right...
Edited on Mon Mar-15-04 08:01 AM by DRoseDARs
...once-in-a-while. Just like people that go to fast food joints and are suprised that they're eating unhealthy food, or order coffee and find it to be rather hot when spilled, some people are dumb enough to believe that condoms make them immune to "crotch critters" and other nasty suprises. Little reminders like warning labels are all we can really do beyond sex education...and we all know what Bush and his ilk think of THAT kind of education...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. ADDITIONAL WARNINGS per WH:
1. Remove immediately after use.
2. Not for use 18 years or younger.
3. Not for use after ingestion of alcohol.
4. Not for use between unmarried individuals.
a. Especially homosexuals and farm animals.
5. Not for use for pleasure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. Warning: Use of this product may put you in HELL
If allergic to heat or sulfur, purify yourself by fire immediately. Then call your pastor and ask Jeebus into your heart.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. Bush should run public service commercials
with the Monty Python song, "Every Sperm is Sacred"
... Every sperm is great.
And if a sperm is wasted,
Got gets quite irate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. If a sperm is like an egg and it's
potential life. Then isn't wearing a condom murder? Maybe it's differant because it's a gang of sperm all fighting to be the one who gets to live so it's the natural death of 99% of sperm and the life of only one sperm. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
17. Okay. Then how 'bout warning labels on seatbelts
to discourage their use:

"Warning. This seatbelt won't always keep you from being killed or injured in a car wreck"

These guys and their RW ideology will be the end of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Okay, add not to use with petroleum jelly.
Then Bush would nix the whole idea. What not use petroleum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. Pandering to single issue voters again.
Shouldn't he be out catching terrorists or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. more stupidity
and more distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. The Other Warning Label
WARNING: May be ribbed for her or his pleasure: God wouldn't like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC