Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the Democrat promoted Syria bill only about Israel protectionism?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DennisReveni Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 04:25 PM
Original message
Is the Democrat promoted Syria bill only about Israel protectionism?
I have been bitching about the idiot Democrats and their Syria bill since I first read about it. It plays right into Bishco's imperialistic hands.
Now we see this happening,
http://tompaine.com/blog.cfm/ID/9942
"CIA In Syria? link
What's happening in Syria has all the hallmarks of a classic, 1950s-era, Cold War-style CIA coup d'etat scheme.
First, on March 7 a gaggle of demonstrators—no more than 20 to 30, according to The New York Times on March 8—was squelched by Syrian police, who arrested not only the demonstrators but swooped up a "junior diplomat from the American Embassy," says the Times. "The United States government protested the detention of the American diplomat to the Syrian government, a spokesman for the embassy told The Associated Press." Now the question is: what was a "junior diplomat" from the United States doing there in the first place. Could he have been from the CIA? (Syria is wondering the same thing.)
Second, the Bush administration is going to announce sanctions against Syria this week, thanks to a law passed by Congress demanding them. On March 12, The Washington Post reported:
The new law has two key parts. First, it requires the administration to ban the export of any dual-use goods that could be channeled into the production of weapons of mass destruction. Some exemptions will be made for products that might be included, such as communications gear, congressional sources said.
Second, the act requires the administration to pick two of six punitive measures. The White House has indicated to congressional officials that it is leaning toward picking more than two. The main new sanctions will be economic, such as banning U.S. exports to Syria except for humanitarian goods such as food and medicine, congressional and administration officials said. Washington may also block financial transactions by Damascus.
In addition, the administration is expected to prohibit aircraft owned or operated by Syria from flying to the United States or using American airspace, a token measure since no Syrian planes fly anywhere near the United States, U.S. officials said.
The most problematic and debated step proposed by the act calls for banning U.S. businesses from investing or operating in Syria, congressional and administration officials said. U.S. oil companies, including ConocoPhillips Co. and Devon Energy Corp., have business interests in Syria.
And finally, on March 14 The New York Times gave prominent coverage to Kurdish riots in northeastern Syria, which spread to Damascus. Jalal Talabani, the longtime asset of U.S. and Israeli intelligence, now a leading force in Iraq's new make-believe government, has close ties to Syrian Kurds, and it strains credulity to think that the Kurdish unrest in Syria is spontaneous. Reports the Times:
Unrest set off by Kurdish demonstrators demanding minority rights spread across northeastern Syria on Saturday, with Kurdish leaders saying up to 15 people were killed and scores wounded over two days as the riot police put down the rare protests with gunfire.
The unrest spread to Damascus, where several hundred riot officers wearing helmets and bearing plastic shields were stationed around Damascus University and in a predominately Kurdish suburb. Students and Kurdish residents of the suburb had staged sit-ins to protest events in the north, human rights activists said.
Syrian Kurds, inspired by the changes next door in Iraq—where the Kurds are seeking to enshrine their distinct identity in a new constitution—have become increasingly vocal in demanding minority rights. The government suspects them of seeking autonomy or even trying to break away to join Iraqi Kurdistan.
So here we are in the 21st century, and it looks like the CIA is still at it, overthrowing governments it doesn't like. I'd call for a congressional inquiry, but Congress is in this up to its collective, Gucci-tied neck."

So are Democrats serving two masters like the PNAC crowd does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's their lame attempt
at saying "Look, we can be tough, too!" I HATE this bill. I have family that suffered through those cruel sanctions in Iraq, and I cannot bear the thought that my husband's family in Syria will suffer the same fate.

And that riot in Syria was not soccer-related. The Kurds have been used to our advantage in Iraq, and they are now doing the same in Syria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Much to digest here
but one thing does come to mind immediately.

A push for Kurdish Independence or even discontent among Kurdish minorities in both Syria and Turkey was always a feared outcome of the defeat of Saddam. It's possible that it is coming to pass and, without doubt, there are those in Iraq who might be instigating it.

I'll have to dwell a bit on the other points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just one master: greed

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC