Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

George Bush did worse things than Martha Stewart...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 11:35 PM
Original message
George Bush did worse things than Martha Stewart...
Bush is a crook. He knew HARKEN's stock was going down. Why? He was on the board of directors and had just approved ENRON-like accounting gimmickry. Smirko

Harken Energy Corporation Internal Documents

March 15, 2004

In his July 8, 2002, press conference, President George W. Bush told reporters "to look back on the directors' minutes" for details of his knowledge of and involvement in the financial reporting of Harken Energy Corporation that was the subject of a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation in the early 1990s.

Bush, who was a director of Harken during the period in question and was himself investigated for insider trading (the SEC determined that there was insufficient evidence to bring charges against him), did not answer specific questions about his knowledge of the company's sale of Harken's Aloha Petroleum subsidiary. Harken reported the gain from the sale before it had received payment from the ultimate buyer, Advance Petroleum Marketing, Inc.

Yet Bush chaired a special committee of board members set up to review the terms of a $12 million note held by Intercontinental Mining and Resources Ltd., which was set up by Harken insiders to purchase Aloha, according to an internal Harken document dated March 14, 1990 that was obtained by the Center for Public Integrity.

SNIP...

The March 14, 1990 Shareholders Notes and the March 14, 1990 minutes from the Board of Directors meeting suggest that Bush was aware of some of the details of the Aloha transaction; the decision to renegotiate the terms of the deal with Advanced Petroleum Marketing was unanimously approved by the board.

CONTINUED...

http://www.public-i.org/dtaweb/report.asp?ReportID=450

OT: Did you notice that AwOL Bush is no longer mentioned on the evening news?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeinesRed Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Joe Conason
is also talking about this in the Observer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Bush had friends, but Martha had none
Thanks for the heads-up! Conason's a good guy. This might be the article:

Bush had friends, but Martha had none
Stewart's improprieties pale in comparison to Bush's Harken dump


by Joe Conason

It's a good thing to be king -- as a certain disgraced diva might tell us -- but not always such a good thing to be queen.

Even Martha Stewart's advocates found her conduct difficult to defend as she faced sentencing and, perhaps, the ruin of the company she has spent her life building. Yet the government brought no charge of illicit trading against her, and the court vacated the specious securities-fraud counts, despite suspicions that inside information had spurred her unloading of ImClone shares before their value plummeted. Prosecutors ultimately accused her of nothing but attempting to conceal the facts about those trades, in part by lying to federal investigators.

Perhaps that was enough to justify her conviction, reduced as those charges were after all the hype. Besides, the taste-marketing maven appears to have believed herself exempt from the rules and laws that govern ordinary people, which is why so many of them celebrated her conviction. The government warned that should Ms. Stewart not be held accountable for her offenses, her escape from punishment would encourage lawlessness.

Ms. Stewart's partisans retort that she was a target of selective prosecution. From right-wing columnists to left-leaning law professors, the converging opinion held that she was brought to book more on account of her celebrity than her culpability. Defenders of the feminist Democrat spanned the spectrum from Rosie O'Donnell to William Safire. Not everyone in the Stewart camp feels she was chosen to make an example of a successful woman in a male corporate world, but many agree that she suffered by exclusion from an "old boys' network" that historically has protected powerful corporate crooks.



CONTINUED...

http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemID=16571
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ask any Republican or Democrat...
...Bush* is above the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. You're right, Q.
I wonder why our side has been so, um, slow to attack the Little Turd from Crawford. Starting with Bill Clinton. Where was he during Selection 2000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. This news is beginning to make some smaller papers.
I hope it gets the ball rolling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. New Book: "House of Bush, House of Saud"
... The story's gone from drip to trickle. This guy's got the goods on the BFEE (sounds like he reads DU, too):

Guerrilla of the Week
Editor's Pick, March 15, 2004

Last week, Salon ran what should have been a blockbuster scoop. Entitled, "The Great Escape," the article was an excerpt from a book released today called "House of Bush, House of Saud: The Secret Relationship Between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties." In it author Craig Unger exposes, among other things, how 140 mainly Saudi nationals were whisked out of the U.S. on private jets in the days immediately following 9/11 while no other commercial aircraft was allowed to leave the tarmac. Unger originally broke the story of the flights in an October 2003 Vanity Fair article. But in last week's Salon article, he lists the actual passenger manifests, and shows how the authorization for the flights came from the highest levels of the White House and the intelligence agencies.

Unger found that passengers on the flights included Osama bin Laden's sister, and more ominously, a Saudi national later identified by Abu Zubaydah, the captured Al Qaeda operative alleged to have planned the USS Cole attack, as a fellow Al Qaeda terrorist. In other words, the U.S. government aided the escape of a man who may have been directly involved in the 9/11 attacks.

Unger's disclosures should have been front-page news. But the story was all but ignored by the mainstream media. This week's release of the book may change that.

SNIP...

Unger: The Saudis are enormously important for several reasons. One is, it's not just that they have the largest oil reserves in the world. It's partly the ease with which they are able to extract oil that allows them to just turn on the spigot and they can lower or raise the price of oil at their will. So in a certain way we are enormously dependent on them and having a close relationship with them has been a key part of… Oil is a strategic resource for the United States. It's enormously important to us - we need that in some way and we have to sort of deal with that in some way, so it's not surprising that we would turn to the Saudis for that. The question is that, in being so addicted to cheap Saudi oil, have we not looked aggressively and have we turned a blind eye to their role in fostering terrorism? And when 9/11 happened, suddenly I think it became much more difficult to turn a blind eye and you start to see this long term relationship start to unravel….

CONTINUED...

http://www.guerrillanews.com/intelligence/doc4097.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, but he isn't a rich powerful woman who is also a
Democrat, so his crimes get a pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. People across America smell a skunk -- even South Carolina...
Stock-dumping
Unsuspecting buyers hurt


March 10, 2004

WHEN a corporate insider learns of impending events that will send a firm's stock price plummeting - or soaring - it's a crime for the insider to cash in on this private information. If the insider sells shares just before bad news becomes public, unsuspecting buyers are stuck with the ensuing losses. If the insider buys shares before good news is known, unsuspecting sellers are robbed of gains that were just around the corner.

Homeware queen Martha Stewart has been convicted of using insider knowledge to dump her ImClone stock in 2001 the day before a major setback caused the price to plunge - thus buyers who purchased her shares were cheated.

Most Americans don't know that President Bush was involved in a similar situation in 1990. Here's the story:

After graduating from Yale, Bush entered the Texas oil business, mostly using investment money from his father's wealthy Republican backers. The son was largely a failure. His first firm, Arbusto (Spanish for bush) Energy Inc., drilled numerous wells, but lost money. His rich backers wrote much of the loss off their taxes.

CONTINUED (requires Registration, but well worth the time)…

http://www.wvgazette.com/section/Editorials/200403098


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. Dick and Bush should go to jail 10 times before
Martha gets a traffic ticket ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. BFEE provides many, many targets of prosecutorial opportunity...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC