Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NC Duers, A Dem challenger to Howard Coble?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 08:09 AM
Original message
NC Duers, A Dem challenger to Howard Coble?
Edited on Tue Mar-16-04 08:09 AM by HFishbine
Most North Carolinians probably know of 6th district republican congressman Howard Coble's firm grip on office (there wasn't even a dem challenger last time he ran for reelection). There's a Greensboro dem though who's thinking of taking him on. Weigh in here: www.edcone.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! I love Ed Cone.....
we have e-mailed back and forth a few times about the BBV situation in Guilford county. He is one smart guy and I would love to see him run. I will certainly let him know too! Thanks HF!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
for the afternoon crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, there's another NC congressman I don't like.
I clicked through to read the bill that the incumbent, Rep. Coble, recently put his name on it. Apparently, he feels that Congress should be allowed to reverse judicial decisions regarding the constitutionality of Congressional decisions. This is analogous to a four-year-old declaring time-out to be unneeded.

I wrote this to Coble:

"Dear Sir:
I am disappointed to see that you support the Congressional Accountability for Judicial Activism Act.

The bill appears to cite Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution as a basis for Congressional reversal of court rulings, but I have consulted this section and I think you interpret it too broadly. Surely, the Founders did not intend to allow Congress to infringe upon the Supreme Court's ability to review legislation.

I'd also like to point out that this is a country ruled not by popular opinion but by constitutional law. If the judicial branch hands down a ruling, I do not believe it is the place of the Congress or the President to argue with it. I hate to sound like a civics teacher, but seeing your name on the bill demands it. Please reconsider your support for this legislation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Great!
Great e-mail to Coble. I'm sure you'll get a canned reply, but probably no shift in position. Thanks for writing though.

Ed's blog mentions today some un-named other possible dem challengers to Coble's seat. Coble is perfectly nice guy, but his policies no longer represent his changing district. Let's keep an eye on this and see if we can send a progressive to congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No, the framers did NOT intend this
Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers 78:

"The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution. By a limited Constitution, I understand one which contains certain specified exceptions to the legislative authority; such, for instance, as that it shall pass no bills of attainder, no ex post facto laws, and the like. Limitations of this kind can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing."

See my collegues comment on Coble's action at:

http://www.thoughtcrimes.org/mt/archives/001191.html

Coble MUST GO!

David Allen
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Distrusting the Government Since 1984
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Kick for several other DUers in NC...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC