Is it true more people have died since Bush* came to power throughout

[Bandit]

the world than the entire eight years of Clinton. I'm talking about violent man created deaths and not deaths through natural disasters. I heard that stated but can't find any verification for it. If true a great talking point.

[Cocoa]

1. most deaths would probably be in the Congo

but that started in 1998.

But in Clinton's term, there were major wars in Yugoslavia and genocide in Rwanda. I doubt this claim.

[DuctapeFatwa]

2. Yes, Kerry will have to convince voters he can kill more

Luckily for him, the US has already begun low-grade invasions of Iran and Syria*, so breaking bush's World Deaths record is one promise Kerry can make with confidence!

Oh, and North Africa, too, but voters aren't as impressed by African deaths.

[billybob537]

3. Just a thought

The number of Americans dying prematurely due to dirtier water and air is expected to be in the thousands anually. I'm not sure but I think the number was 30,000.
Billybob:-(

[radwriter0555]

4. the bush regime has overseen the deaths of at least 30,000 people since

the puppet stole office.

Figure 3000+ on 9.11, 15,000+ in afghanistan (think daisy cutters) and close to 10,000 iraqi deaths and then the 1000+ and counting US soldiers.

He's got hussein outnumbered HUGE.

[ButterflyBlood]

5. more Americans most likely

but I doubt overall. There was a lot of ethnic cleansing going on in the world while Clinton was president, but of course it wasn't his fault and he actually put an end to a lot of it.