Freepers are so paranoid!

[carrowsboy]

In response to Asscroft's "very real potential" that the al-Qaida terrorism network could again strike the United States:

Reply 1 - Posted by: Landshark, 8/3/2003 1:26:04 PM

And when they do (not if), watch the libs blame Bush.

It's as if we had ignored 9/11 they would have said, "OK, now we're even."

On a liberal could believe that way.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Bulworth, 8/3/2003 1:36:44 PM

No, liberals would blame Bush for another Al Qaeda attack because he's been charging around Iraq for no good reason for the last few months.


Reply 3 - Posted by: Kris k., 8/3/2003 1:46:20 PM

The democraps are counting on a terror attack before the 2004 presidential election. What slim hope they have of recapturing the White House rests soley on an event or topic that they can spin against President Bush. The economy won't do it, the war in Iraq won't do it, but a terror attack might.

I've said this before -- the democrap thirst for political power is a national security threat. It isn't just muslims who trade in the "my enemy's enemy is my friend" business. If an al-qaida suckerpunch will damage the President and give the 'craps a toehold in 2004, they'll be tacit supporters.

al qaida has operatives in both houses of congress, and that puts all of us at risk.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Coy860, 8/3/2003 1:53:45 PM

It is a shame that the democrats are rooting for al-Qaida to hurt the American people.
It is disgusting that their forced political correctness deters law enforcement and even private citizens from suspecting Arabs, Muslims in particular. This crap has got to stop.
If a black person robs a bank, do 10 white people have to be stopped at a roadblock for every black stopped? Common sense says no, look for the person who fits the description and profile, but then, democrats don't have common sense, they have 'feelings'


Reply 5 - Posted by: Allegra, 8/3/2003 2:25:47 PM

It's not just a 'shame' that the dems want another attack on America. It's sinful and evil.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Coy860, 8/3/2003 2:39:18 PM

You are correct #5, just the remembering of September 11 sickens me.
The good people of America do not want anymore pain.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Lady Z, 8/3/2003 2:53:34 PM

Most knowledgeable people understand -- 9/11 was about clinton -- more than Bush. Bush was barely in office when it happened.

The demorats are hoping for body bags and another attack on FULL BUSH watch.

They are not sick. They are un/American. AND -- the people have seen this. That's why they can't get any traction. People don't trust them, i.e. demorats, anymore.


Reply 8 - Posted by: Bulworth, 8/3/2003 3:03:32 PM

Nobody, not the DNC, the DLC, Terry McCauliffe, Howard Dean, or liberals at large want another attack on America. Any supposition that they do is just sick.

Meanwhile, we have a warning that another attack could be coming, and the President takes a month-long vacation.


Reply 9 - Posted by: mamamoose, 8/3/2003 3:14:33 PM

What a cheap shot No. 8, and if you really believe what you just implied, you do need help! What changes when W goes to Texas is that he can be more relaxed, wear casual clothes and drive around in his truck! Every President who ever left Washington to rest has taken his work with him, including your obvious favorite, the infamous B. Clinton.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Allegra, 8/3/2003 3:21:00 PM

#8, that really was a cheap and 'typical' shot. Every single day we face attack. President Bush has more on his plate than any human being on the planet. He should have NO down time? There is nothing he can do in DC that he can't do on his ranch.

For that matter, if you object so strenuously to someone having a little relaxation in dangerous times, then I am supposing you objected vehemently to Clinton's vacationing with some frequency while our WTC, our embassies and our naval vessels were attacked. You probably HATED it when you learned that Clinton left world leaders on hold while Monica blew him, and you probably REALLY blew your stack when Sandy Berger could not give an order to strike at OSAMA because Clinton was watching golf and didn't want to talk about it.

I bet you were really, really OFFENDED, right? By your own measure, you should have been!


Reply 11 - Posted by: NoLibsNoLies, 8/3/2003 3:24:57 PM

What's wrong with W going to Texas for a month? When you're president, you're on duty no matter where you are. And do you want him staying in Washington when the congress is all out of town for a month? (Hey, can he do recess appointments when the 'rats are out of town?)


Reply 13 - Posted by: Landshark, 8/3/2003 3:34:04 PM

#2 shows the utter lack of logical thought process in the American liberal, know by its scientific name: headupus asses.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Bulworth, 8/3/2003 3:48:32 PM

So because Congress is out of town means W doesn't have anything to do? Congressional breaks aren't meant for vacation time, they're for congressmen to meet with their constituents in their home states. Bush should be having constant meetings with Alan Greenspan and the Secretary of Labor to fix the anemic job market by some other means than tax cuts for the rich.
Of course Bush is entitled to time off.
But a month is just ridiculous.
BTW, Robert Patterson was never able to verify the Osama/Golf story.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Yorkiemom, 8/3/2003 4:00:05 PM

The Dims should hope and pray al-Qaida doesn't strike our country again, not only because of the harm it does our country, but since most polls show the Republicans are favored overwhelmingly in national security matters, people know Bush would do a better job than any of the Dims running for president. But, sadly, Dims don't think that way.



Reply 16 - Posted by: losgatos, 8/3/2003 4:06:59 PM

Oh, don't worry #14. Dubya is going to be doing what congress is doing. Meeting with his constituents and raking in more money than your idol Slick ever thought of. Its driving you left wing liberals crazy isn't it. The only candidate you have who can even get a contribution is the loony leftist Dean. Slick and his dreadful wife have wrecked the democrat party. Another part of his shining legacy.



Reply 19 - Posted by: Double Dog Dare, 8/3/2003 4:30:25 PM

If we are attacked again, the dems and the leftist media will be an accessory to the crime. The fact that they are putting down the President leaves terrorist to believe that with Bush out of office the dems will go easier on them.

The fact that the dems are rooting for another attack so they will win gives the terrorist the incentive to attack us soon and before the election. The dems and the liberal media are all accessories to the next 911.

They are wooing the terrorist to play along with them and cause Bush and the Republican congress to go under. The terrorist would see this as kinder and more compassionate administration and congress under the dems taking the helm.

The dems and all leftist liberals should be subpoenaed to appear before a congressional committee investigation and charged with aiding and giving comfort to the enemy by their actions of support for another 911 terrorist attack.


Reply 20 - Posted by: nolie, 8/3/2003 5:23:56 PM

The Dems and liberals, including the main-stream media, can't wait for another attack on the US. They are standing around salivating and licking their chops in anticipation of one. They are so desperate for some help in bringing Dubya down they have lost sight of what's good for America, it's for the Party they care about. It's not the vast right wing conspiracy the country should be concerned about but the vast leftist liberal conspiracy and they are just about to destroy this country.


Reply 21 - Posted by: xqcguy, 8/3/2003 5:45:19 PM

#14. You are amazing. How can you type with such an advanced case of rectal-cranial inversion?


Reply 23 - Posted by: MadTexan, 8/3/2003 6:18:18 PM

The dummycrap postings on this thread prove that Ann Coulter is right!

http://www.lucianne.com/threads2.asp?artnum=62911

[Bluzmann57]

1. Paranoid?

Stupid is more like it. And quite frankly, I'm tired of being attacked by these fucking morons. If its a fight they want, its a fight they're going to get! I most certainly don't want terrorists attacking my homeland ever again, but I don't want to put with a bunch of crap if it ever happens again either. Please excuse my language. It's just that these people who question my patriotism and love of this country really anger me.

[whoYaCallinAlib]

2. Get out of freeperville while you still can!!!

They will turn your brain inside out.

[foo_bar]

3. freepers <> ldotters

but to the faithful, all republicans are freepers since they make the best strawmen. I once dated a Dem activist who had no idea what a 'freeper' was except she was called one by the Greens. She figured it meant 'non-white'.

[buff2]

4. They are so delusional

I've never seen ANY posting or heard ANY democrat cheering for another attack on the USA. In fact,that is the very thing we are SCARED of,especially with that doofus squatting in the people's house and threatening every other country in the world! Everytime I see their ignorance displayed I can't help from thinking about that movie "One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest". :crazy:

[KG]

7. delusional and ignorant.

their lack of knowledge about how things work is scary.

[Rose Siding]

17. One of them said it and

the rest just followed with a whole riff on the theme, as though it were so. It would be really bad IF IT WERE TRUE! What lunatics.

[CosmicVortex10]

5. I wouldnt say their any more or less dogmatic then any other party

Every party has their dogmatic barkers. You can always tell when any politician is lying, their mouths move.

[liberalhistorian]

6. WTF????? "The democrap thirst for political power is

a national security threat." SAY WHAT????????? Oh, that's rich indeed, considering that the repukes are the ones in power in all branches of the government and most states, and considering what they did in order to get that power. You know, little things like stealing a presidential election and having the Supreme Court appoint their Great Leader. Or fucking with votes by rigging elections, illegally purging voter rolls in predominately black and Dem areas, pushing the touchscreen voting machines for which there would be no accountability, intimidating elections officials and on and on and on. And WE'RE the ones whose "thirst for political power is a national security threat?" Uh, no, I DON'T FUCKING THINK SO! It's time to take the gloves off with these people and quit playing nice!

[DiverDave]

8. This sums it up

Reply 3 - Posted by: Kris k., 8/3/2003 1:46:20 PM
"al qaida has operatives in both houses of congress, and that puts all of us at risk."

Um, earth to kris, you be hitten that pipe again, eh?

God this is to easy, what a bunch of idiots.

[Prodemsouth]

9. the bulworth guy sounded good, added logic to the mix of idiots.

n/t

[jagguy]

10. with the various and sundry conspiracy theories around here

I'd be careful accusing them of paranioa.

Glass houses you know...

[cherryperry]

12. just what I was thinking...LOL n/t

[WoodrowFan]

23. I Agree

I've seen the exact same stuff on here I've seen on freeperville.** Just change 'clinton' to 'bush' and vola! (sp), a DU conspiracy theory complete with website links to the same websites about coups and camps and such, sheesh.



**Possible song "Wasting MY Brain Away Again on Freeperville"

[imax2268]

11. I don't know what it is...

but rethugs think that they are right and everyone who questions Chimpy McShrub is a "traitor"

I have stickers on my car that say 1)Bush Lied People Died...and 2)Take Back Our Country '04...

I have been flicked off...people have thrown things at me while I am driving...my car was even keyed. I had a sign on my lawn that said the same as the other sticker "Take Back Our Country '04"...and someone tore it down and wrote "liberal pig" on it.

I am tired of these people and their arrogant attitudes...they realize that their leader is failing and it's my guess that they have to stick to their guns till the end. Just my observation...

[are_we_united_yet]

13. Diabolical aren't we????? hahahahahah!!!!!!

"They are not sick. They are un/American. AND -- the people have seen this. That's why they can't get any traction. People don't trust them, i.e. demorats, anymore. "

Yeah, I'm wondering who'll trust you.

[Ein]

14. They think we want terror?

"The democraps are counting on a terror attack before the 2004 presidential election. What slim hope they have of recapturing the White House rests soley on an event or topic that they can spin against President Bush. The economy won't do it, the war in Iraq won't do it, but a terror attack might."

They think it will help our political agenda? They really DO think the media is liberal don't they?

It's contrary to.... uhm.... the real world.

[Resistance Is Futile]

16. Denial of reality

It's contrary to.... uhm.... the real world.

Sounds quite familiar -- like everything that comes out of the Junta's collective mouths.



Rethug vs everyone else can be summed up as shared delusions vs common dreams.

[Randi_Listener]

15. I feel more stupid

After reading that tripe. I want that 3 minutes of my life back.

[Poisonskin23]

18. Dittos

You can tell the effect Rush has had on their thought processes. They sit there and make shit up in their heads until they believe it.

[sugargoose]

19. How wrong can anyone be.......

First of all, I don't think any single American, regardless of political affiliation, wants a terrorist attack that may potentially harm family and friends. If there were anyone who did, it would be those who profit from it or get another excuse to quench their revenge bloodlust. But I really don't think anyone wants another one.

Regarding Liberals, I would especially think the opposite, since more worry that a state of turmoil and war may provide an excuse for martial law or a cancellation of the election.

I don't understand what they are basing that opinion on other than abject hatred.

[xequals]

20. Rule #1: don't let the right-wing frame the debate

This is their typical "liberals are un-American" attack. The responses on this thread are the INCORRECT way to respond to such attack; going on the defensive allows them the upperhand no matter how logical the defense.

The best defense is a good offense -- reverse the attack.

Instead of defending by explaining "why liberals aren't traitors", attack conservatives for being the traitors they are! When they say "liberals are traitors" respond with "conservatives are traitors who wish to undermine the democratic process and stifle dissent. Conservatives favor totalitarianism over democracy."

The founding fathers knew that the only way for representative democracy to succeed was "dissent as a patriotic concept". Over and over this is the theme -- concepts such as "loyal opposition", "majority rule with minority rights", etc. Our entire system is setup with various checks and balances to PREVENT lock-step thinking, to encourage debate and dissent. The founding fathers knew that the only way to prevent totalitarianism from creeping into democracy was to create a system which celebrated the individual's right to dissent.

Dissent is a core principal of American democracy.
Conservatives don't tolerate dissent.
Conservatives are enemies of American democracy.

[AWD]

21. My favorite.....

Reply 15 - Posted by: Yorkiemom, 8/3/2003 4:00:05 PM

The Dims should hope and pray al-Qaida doesn't strike our country again, not only because of the harm it does our country, but since most polls show the Republicans are favored overwhelmingly in national security matters, people know Bush would do a better job than any of the Dims running for president. But, sadly, Dims don't think that way.


Yes, and if that terrorist attack happens, how exactly does that make Repukes strong on national security again???

The disconnect is staggering.

[Egnever]

22. I love this one!

Most knowledgeable people understand -- 9/11 was about clinton -- more than Bush. Bush was barely in office when it happened.



I am quite sure this guy thinks hes knowledgeable.

:eyes:

[Loonman]

24. "rooting for al Qaeda"

Proves again that even the shit I took this morning is better than a freeper.