|
badly executed and with side trips to places that contain only oil and old pre-terrorist scores to settle.
Bush promised a good economy to justify multiple tax cuts, and Bin Ladin's head on a pike. He also promised Hussein's head on a pike, not that Hussein did anything approaching making war on us. We have an economy in the shitter that will remain in the shitter because we are in an open ended war on terror that cannot be wrapped up because its "end" will be a disaster for Bush's popularity. We are in a war against terror where we have seen fit to insult our strongest allies to the point that they feel that humiliating Bush is more important than rounding up terrorists. We are stuck in the daily 120 degree heat of Iraq fighting a war under pretenses that at best turned out not to be true, and our fig leaf of installing democracy is now viewed by the natives that never lined the streets cheering our arrival as a collaborationist gambit to steal their oil at best, or worst to give it to their supposed enemy Israel.
To parody Rumsfeld: "Is this working out for us? Hell no. Will we keep it up? Gracious, yes. Why? We're not at liberty to tell you that."
I'm tired of the apparently useless deaths of American soldiers being described as being at "acceptable levels." There is no good reason for being in Iraq, and any losses, whether in battle, accident, self-inflicted, etc. or any of the $4 billion expense per month is not acceptable. Why should we pay $50 billion a year (minimum, probably three times that) so that Halliburton can make a billion a month? Can't we just bring the boys home and simply give Halliburton the money outright? Or are we already doing that too?
|