Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does OPEC have us over a "barrel?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:17 PM
Original message
Does OPEC have us over a "barrel?
Do you think it will cut back production? If you do, what should we working class folks do? Options are gone now since most of us have already re-financed homes and used up our equity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, the first cutbacks will hit the market the first week of april
Buy a bicycle, start riding all your short trips you can on it.
Trade down to a smaller car, if there is no mass transit in your area.

I expect gas prices to be around $3.25/gal by the end of summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oggy Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Keep your fingers crossed
that it isn't a forced reduction in output due to Peak Oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. This whole administration
had to be in office now, for peak oil.
Read about resource monopoly governments.
Bush wants to be the first modern era pharoh.

So if you have a gas guzzler, sell it now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. $3.25/gal would be slightly higher than the record price
of about $3/gal (in 2004 dollars) reached in 1979. Back then, we raised the CAFE standards and gas prices dropped back. It doesn't sound like Congress and the Administration are bright enough to raise CAFE standards now. And we're now approaching (if not already at) peak oil. It will all go south from here.

If you own an SUV, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. My Icon
is me on my main vehicle.
Yes, anytime the price reduces from here on
will be a bread and circuses tactic to
win temporary favor, and be followed by even higher prices.
Unless Cheney steps in front of a microwave oven, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. no china has us over the barrel
they are sucking alot of oil and raw products to fuel the 259 billion dollar walmart and other stores. 5% increase in paper-price rise in steel,etc,etc,and add the huge trade debt to china and their refusal to reform their currency. as long as the wal-martians keep buying ,the usa sinks further into stagflation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes
As long as we refuse to tap into our own resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Dude, don't fool yourself. We used up most of our resources by the 1970's
What's in ANWR would last us about a week, and I'd be willing to bet most of it would be sold to the Japanese anyway (they are willing to pay a lot more for it than we are used to paying).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I didn't say ANWR
We have fields in the lower 48 that could be developed, but due to environmental restrictions it's not feasible. A good example would be California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigendian Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's not a case of refusing.
There just isn't a need to at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You are talking about
medicines and plastic for your grandchildren when you talk about sucking the strategic reserves of the US. It won't be cheap, either.

It was time to start conserving a decade ago. Now it is past time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC