Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a question about the 60 Minutes Interview with Clarke

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:51 PM
Original message
I have a question about the 60 Minutes Interview with Clarke
Towards the end of the segment, Leslie Stahl asked Steven Hadley about Clarke's statement that right after 9-11 took place he was pulled into Bush's office along with a few others and told to see if there was a connection between Saddam and Bin Laden. Hadley, I believe, commented to the effect that no such meeting took place. To which Stahl replied that CBS News independently confirmed this with two sources including one eye-witness. Hadley replied that he stood on his statement. Has anyone reported on who these sources might be or who might be the eyewitness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. One of them is named Kerrsey (I think)
He was a former staffer of Clarke's and is now an NBC analyst. He was on the Nightly News tonight. Dan Bartlett basically admitted today that the meeting likely happened but he didn't know what was said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. zackly, which makes Hadley a liar once more
remember his role as "fall guy who didn't take the fall" over the yellowcake fiasco?

seems the ONLY bushco slobs who EVER get the boot are ones who tell the truth, like Lindsey, ONeill, and some generals whose names I forget.

who else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. Gen. Eric K. Shinseki (general you forgot)
Mr. Wolfowitz, the deputy defense secretary, opened a two-front war of words on Capitol Hill, calling the recent estimate by Gen. Eric K. Shinseki of the Army that several hundred thousand troops would be needed in postwar Iraq, "wildly off the mark." Pentagon officials have put the figure closer to 100,000 troops. Mr. Wolfowitz then dismissed articles in several newspapers this week asserting that Pentagon budget specialists put the cost of war and reconstruction at $60 billion to $95 billion in this fiscal year. He said it was impossible to predict accurately a war's duration, its destruction and the extent of rebuilding afterward.

more...

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/attack/consequences/2003/0228pentagoncontra.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great memory - I forgot she nailed him on that.
In answer to your question - no. I haven't heard any names, hope CBS or Stahl will report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pyrenees Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Veterans
When did veterans of foreign wars become so popular with the Democrats?

I didn't realize they were so pro-military / pro-war.

Pyrenees
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. why do you come here and make such INSULTING remarks?
I wear my FATHER's dog tag from WWII, because we LOST the war against fascism, you unprintable......

I was in DC a year ago, marching with the Veterans for Peace, among which were many WWII and Korea vets. they can't STAND what this pitiful excuse for a leader is doing to our nation's soldiers and veterans

you should be ashamed of yourself for making such an asinine statement.

one can be against the war and pro-soldier, but then you didn't come here to make such fine distinctions, did you?

wise up

be alert, STS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Before you go...
you might want to read as much as you can here. you may learn that we have some pretty diverse, fairly intelligent, well-balanced individuals around here. It's more representative of what America REALLY looks like than that other party.

Welcome to DU (and the Big Tent)

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I'm sure you will find many many veterans in the democratic Party
Remember until early seventies there was a draft and most working class people aka Democrats got drafted and sent to war while rich kids like Bush* got cushy NG jobs which they then left when they felt they had served long enough. Just because someone is a veteran doesn't make them pro-war. In fact I would be willing to bet the exact opposite is true. The more a person saw combat the less apt they are to promote warfare. That is the difference between us and the Chickenhawks who never saw a day of combat. They know nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Plenty vets here, pyrenees.
You can be, too.




http://goarmy.com/contact/


A hitch has changed many peoples' lives for the better. Just be careful who is CINC while you serve.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. ummmm.....
pro war, maybe not, I would hope that all people are opposed, except as a last resort. But I think a few veterans are Democrats, don't you? My dad was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthseeker1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. I come from a family of vets
My dad is a Vietnam vet, one of my grandfathers served in WWII and the other in Korea, and my husband was in the AF for seven years.

So THERE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. As a Vietnam Veteran ...
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 07:33 PM by TahitiNut
... it makes sense to me to support our military by being anti-war. Anyone who's actually been in one is either anti-war or psychotic. Got that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Not to be picky but your ribbons are out of order
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 07:50 PM by Bandit
Your Bronze Star should be above the other medals. First should be the Nat Def then VSR then VCR then above them (on top) should be the Bronze Star (I'm sure you already know this though). And I thought you were a REMF(kidding) but I see maybe not completely. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Well, I never wore them. I indeed was a REMF, though ...
... a USARV HQ type. Hell, I'm still happy to have drawn duty at Long Binh instead of the DMZ, or even IV Corps. Evevn at that, I saw more than enough one night during Tet '69. I have absolutely no need to have seen any more than I did. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Dems have always supported the military
Have you noticed how many Dems in governemnt actually served? And have you noticed how few in Bush's administration have not served?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Veterans ....
especially in this government: tend to be Democrats by default ...

Why ? .. because the GOP members of government, by and large, REFUSED the call to military service ...

Dick Cheney ? .... DIDNT serve ...

Ted Kennedy ? .... served with honor ...

John Ashcroft ? ... DIDNT serve ...

George McGovern ? ..... served with honor ...

Tom Delay, Dennis Hastert, Roy Blount, David Dryer ? .. DIDNT serve ...

Tom Daschle, Tom Harkin, Charlie Rangel, Dick Gephardt, Fritz Hollings .... ALL served their nation ......

And THAT is just the tip of the iceberg ....

GET the FACTS .. you WONT get them from Rush or Hannity ....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Bye bye!
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Didn't Condi confirm it? She defended Bush's questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. From the book - page 32
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 06:58 PM by rmpalmer
...and there wandering alone around the Situation Room, was the President. He looked like he wanted something to do. He grabbed a few of us and closed the door.....

"Look into Iraq, Saddam," the President said testily and left us. Lisa Gordon-Hagerty (she worked in dept with Clarke) stared after him with her mouth hanging open.

Paul Kurtz walked in, passing the President on the way out. Seeing our expressions, he asked, "Geez, what just happened here?"

"Wolfowitz got to him," Lisa said, shaking her head.

Lisa must be the confirming witness, and Kurtz the other person Leslie Stahl referenced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I wonder if they will go public on this?
Anyone have info on them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. If the WH keeps blaming 9/11 on Clarke
like they did today, I bet those two corroborating witnesses might speak up.

I hope so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Other prima facie lie: "he told me he was pkeased with Bush
when he left" "he told you that?" "I believe he was pleased..."
Hadley Lamar from Blazing Sadles...:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. ABC News found 3 independent witnesses
Tonight on ABC News, they said the White House denied the meetings ever took place. ABC said they had 3 independent witnesses to the meeting; and the White House immediately admitted that the meetings took place; but they denied that the conversations were as described.

So, maybe Clarke, CBS News and ABC News are all lying and the White House is just timidly backing down when challenged. Or, maybe the White House knows damn well that the meetings took place and just doesn't want to be caught in a blatant lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. RED ALERT! Time to CALL the Media! A DUer named bigtree put this
list together, so I can take credit only for passing it along. Bigtree - wherever you are, THANKS for doing all the work here! GUYS - WE NEED TO KEEP THIS FIRE STOKED!

Chris Matthews was on TV this morning saying the White House wants to push this off the radar as quickly as possible.

SOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooo, what do YOU want to do??????

And note my sig line at the bottom - to RAISE HELL ON THE HILL, about this, FOR FREE!

Use the responses to strike back at the attacks, here and elsewhere.

MSNBC-

Opinions: mailto:letters@msnbc.com

News: mailto:World@MSNBC.com

Letters to the Editor: mailto:World@MSNBC.com

MSNBC on the Internet
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
________________________________________________________________

CNN- (404) 827 – 1500

CNN TV: http://www.cnn.com/feedback/cnntv /

CNN.com: http://www.cnn.com/feedback/dotcom /
_________________________________________________________________

letters@latimes.com

Readers' Representative Office: http://www.latimes.com/services/site/la-comment-readersrep.story

Los Angeles Times
202 W. 1st St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 237-5000

The Times Orange County
1375 Sunflower Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1697
(714) 966-5600

Los Angeles Times
Valley Edition
20000 Prairie Street
Chatsworth, CA 91311
(818) 772-3200
Los Angeles Times
Ventura County Edition
93 S. Chestnut Street
Ventura, CA 93001
(805) 653-7547
_________________________________________________________________

New York Times:

To Write The Publisher or President: http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/infoservdirectory.html#o

Letters to the Editor: http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/infoservdirectory.html#a

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
E-mail to letters@nytimes.com .

OP-ED/EDITORIAL
For information on Op-Ed submissions, call (212) 556-1831 or send article to ped@nytimes.com" target="_blank">oped@nytimes.com . To write to the editorial page editor, send to editorial@nytimes.com .

NEWS DEPARTMENT
To send comments and suggestions (about news coverage only) or to report errors that call for correction, e-mail nytnews@nytimes.com or leave a message at 1-888-NYT-NEWS.
The Editors
executive-editor@nytimes.com
managing-editor@nytimes.com

The Newsroom
news-tips@nytimes.com ; the-arts@nytimes.com
bizday@nytimes.com ; foreign@nytimes.com
metro@nytimes.com ; national@nytimes.com
sports@nytimes.com ; washington@nytimes.com

PUBLIC EDITOR
To reach Daniel Okrent, who represents the readers, e-mail public@nytimes.com or call (212) 556-7652.

TO WRITE THE PUBLISHER OR PRESIDENT

Arthur Sulzberger Jr., Chairman & Publisher:
publisher@nytimes.com .

Janet L. Robinson, President & General Manager:
president@nytimes.com .
_________________________________________________________________

USA Today:

Letters to the Editor: http://www.usatoday.com/marketing/feedback/feedback-online.aspx?type=1...

USA TODAY / USATODAY.com
7950 Jones Branch Drive
McLean, VA 22108-0605
_________________________________________________________________

Washington Post:

How can I contact Washington Post writers?: http://washingtonpost.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/washingtonpost.cfg/php/endu... *&p_li=

How do I submit a letter to the editor?: http://washingtonpost.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/washingtonpost.cfg/php/endu... *&p_li=

How do I submit an Op-Ed piece?
http://washingtonpost.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/washingtonpost.cfg/php/endu... *&p_li=

How do I contact the Ombudsman?: http://washingtonpost.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/washingtonpost.cfg/php/endu... *&p_li=

The Washington Post
1150 15th Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20071
__________________________________________________________________

More:

National Newspapers: http://newslink.org/--news.html

Television by state: http://newslink.org/stattele.html

Radio by State: http://newslink.org/statradi.html

Networks-

Radio: http://newslink.org/netr.html

Television: http://newslink.org/nett.html

(CBS) 60 Minutes:

ADDRESS:
60 Minutes
524 West 57th St.
New York, NY 10019

PHONE: (212) 975-3247

TRANSCRIPTS: 1-800-777-TEXT

VIDEOTAPES: 1-800-848-3256

CBS “60 Minutes” email info:

http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/60minutes/main3415.shtml - go to the bottom of the page and click on "feedback" and you're in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Contacted each one


Thanks for all the hard work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. OMG! I surfed so many shows tonight I don't remember

but, one of them that now works for one of the stations and was interviewed tonight. he was a staffer for Clarke, that much I remember... sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC